A systematic approach to developing national technology policy and strategy for emerging technologies: A case study of nanotechnology for Thailand's agriculture industry

This research develops a systematic approach for policy makers to strategically define the national technology policy for emerging technologies. In this approach, a hierarchical decision model is built and qualified expert opinions are used as measurements. There are four levels in the hierarchy: mission, objectives, technological goals, and research strategies. Three panels are formed based on their background and expertise in order to minimize and balance any possible biases among the members. The objectives, technological goals, and research strategies are evaluated and prioritized, according to their contribution to the country's mission, by quantifying the experts' judgments. This research also demonstrates several approaches for the validation of results. Inconsistency measure, intraclass correlation coefficient, and statistical test for the reliability of the experts and group agreement are used for that purpose. Finally, HDM sensitivity analysis is brought in to study the robustness of the rankings, especially at the technology level that may be caused by potential changes in the national strategic direction.

[1]  Dirk Messner,et al.  Strengthening Technological Capability in Developing Countries Lessons from German Technical Cooperation , 1994 .

[2]  Thomas L. Saaty.  Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory , 2000 .

[3]  Sanjaya Lall,et al.  Structural Problems of African Industry , 1992 .

[4]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty's analytic hierarchy process , 1987 .

[5]  John Bessant,et al.  Effective Innovation Policy: A New Approach , 1997 .

[6]  O. H. Bray,et al.  Fundamentals of technology roadmapping , 1997 .

[7]  Robert Phaal,et al.  Fast-start technology roadmapping , 2000 .

[8]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Frame Reflection: Toward The Resolution Of Intractable Policy Controversies , 1994 .

[10]  Albert Gore,et al.  Technology for America's Economic Growth, a New Direction to Build Economic Strength , 1993 .

[11]  Hongyi Chen,et al.  A sensitivity analysis algorithm for hierarchical decision models , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  S. Lall.  Reinventing Industrial Strategy: The Role of Government Policy in Building Industrial Competitiveness , 2004 .

[13]  Nathasit Gerdsri.  An analytical approach to building a technology development envelope (TDE) for roadmapping of emerging technologies , 2005 .

[14]  S. Wood,et al.  Commercializing Nascent Technology: The Case of Laser Diodes at Sony , 1998 .

[15]  R. Phaal,et al.  Developing a technology roadmapping system , 2005, A Unifying Discipline for Melting the Boundaries Technology Management:.

[16]  Hongyi Chen.  Sensitivity analysis for hierarchical decision models , 2007 .

[17]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Moderation of Policy-Making? , 1998 .

[18]  J. Bartko,et al.  On Various Intraclass Correlation Reliability Coefficients , 1976 .

[19]  Sungjoo Lee,et al.  Technology roadmapping for R&D planning: The case of the Korean parts and materials industry , 2007 .

[20]  Dundar F. Kocaoglu,et al.  Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to build a strategic framework for technology roadmapping , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[21]  Dundar F. Kocaoglu,et al.  A participative approach to program evaluation , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[22]  R. C. Lenz,et al.  Technological forecasting : a practical approach , 1970 .

[23]  Yuya Kajikawa,et al.  Structure of knowledge in the science and technology roadmaps , 2008 .

[24]  A. Kameoka,et al.  A challenge of integrating technology foresight and assessment in industrial strategy development and policymaking , 2004 .

[25]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The Emergence of Emerging Technologies , 2002 .

[26]  Nathasit Gerdsri.  An Analytical Approach To Building A Technology Development Envelope (Tde) For Roadmapping Of Emerging Technologies , 2007 .

[27]  Joseph Paul Martino,et al.  Technological Forecasting for Decisionmaking , 1975 .

[28]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Forecasting and Management of Technology , 1991 .

[29]  R. Phaal,et al.  Characterisation of technology roadmaps: purpose and format , 2001, PICMET '01. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol.1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37199).

[30]  D. Wilemon,et al.  From emerging technology to competitive advantage , 1999, PICMET '99: Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol-1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.99CH36310).

[31]  G. Gijsbers,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process. , 2001 .

[32]  D. Ernst,et al.  Technological capabilities in the context of export-led growth: a conceptual framework , 2003 .

[33]  Mihály Simai,et al.  Practical Guide for Active National Policy Makers - what Science and Technology Policy Can and Cannot Do? , 2003 .

[34]  Daniel A. Mazmanian,et al.  Effective policy implementation , 1981 .

[35]  Totti Könnölä,et al.  Prospective voluntary agreements for escaping techno-institutional lock-in , 2006 .

[36]  Torsten Fleischer,et al.  Assessing emerging technologies—Methodological challenges and the case of nanotechnologies , 2005 .

[37]  David Sheskin,et al.  Inferential Statistical Tests Employed with Two or More Independent Samples (and Related Measures of Association/Correlation) , 2003 .