A Comparison of a Novel Application of Hierarchical Linear Modeling and Nonparametric Analysis for Single-Subject Designs

Behavioral researchers commonly use single-subject experimental designs to evaluate treatment effects. Several methods of data analysis are used, each with its own set of methodological strengths and limitations. Visual inspection is a common method to assess variability, level, and trend both within and between conditions. To quantify treatment outcomes for particular participants, researchers use nonparametric indices such as percentage of nonoverlapping data points (PND) and percentage of data points exceeding the median (PEM). Increasing attention has been directed to parametric methods for analyzing single-subject time series data analysis, including the estimation of individual growth curves and related functions via hierarchical linear modeling (HLM). The present study compares and contrasts the use of PND, PEM, and HLM for estimating individual treatment effects. The example in question utilized a clinical data set involving 36 obsessive–compulsive behaviors across 17 participants. The specific implementation of the HLM model is discussed in detail to illustrate applicability to single-subject designs. Strengths and weaknesses of each method are discussed, including the accessibility of PEM–PND and the robust and sensitive indices provided by the individual growth-curve model. Overall, consistent effects for the treatment phase were demonstrated, with moderate agreement among methods. This application also shows how treatment effects can be modeled and provides 1 example of how individual differences in treatment can be characterized across participants within a study. In this case, the treatment appeared equally effective across the age range of participants, with age not being correlated with individual estimates of treatment response.

[1]  P. J. Huber The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions , 1967 .

[2]  Timothy J. Lewis,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Modeling Meta-Analysis of Single-Subject Design Research , 2014 .

[3]  Justin D. Lane,et al.  Visual analysis in single case experimental design studies: Brief review and guidelines , 2014, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[4]  Richard I. Parker,et al.  Phase Contrasts for Multiphase Single Case Intervention Designs. , 2006 .

[5]  Kimberly J. Vannest,et al.  Incorporating nonoverlap indices with visual analysis for quantifying intervention effectiveness in single-case experimental designs , 2014, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[6]  G. A. Marcoulides Multilevel Analysis Techniques and Applications , 2002 .

[7]  Laura M. Stapleton,et al.  The Effect of Small Sample Size on Two-Level Model Estimates: A Review and Illustration , 2014, Educational Psychology Review.

[8]  誠 竹厚,et al.  Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition(WISC-IV)「絵の抹消」の有用性 , 2014 .

[9]  Yan Ping Xin,et al.  A Meta-Analysis and Review of Sight Word Research and Its Implications for Teaching Functional Reading to Individuals with Moderate and Severe Disabilities , 1998 .

[10]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[11]  Hsen-Hsing Ma An Alternative Method for Quantitative Synthesis of Single-Subject Researches , 2006, Behavior modification.

[12]  A. Feingold Effect sizes for growth-modeling analysis for controlled clinical trials in the same metric as for classical analysis. , 2009, Psychological methods.

[13]  Eden Nagler Kyse,et al.  Analyzing data from single-case designs using multilevel models: new applications and some agenda items for future research. , 2013, Psychological methods.

[14]  Kenneth A. Kavale,et al.  Social Skills Interventions with Students with Emotional and Behavioral Problems: A Quantitative Synthesis of Single-Subject Research , 1998 .

[15]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  The Quantitative Synthesis of Single-Subject Research , 1987 .

[16]  Erin E. Barton,et al.  Comparison of Overlap Methods for Quantitatively Synthesizing Single-Subject Data , 2010 .

[17]  Hsen-Hsing Ma,et al.  Effects of Treatment on Disruptive Behaviors: A Quantitative Synthesis of Single-Subject Researches Using the PEM Approach , 2007 .

[18]  W. Shadish,et al.  Characteristics of single-case designs used to assess intervention effects in 2008 , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[19]  Robert S. Stawski,et al.  Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling (2nd Edition) , 2013 .

[20]  I. Manion OCD in Children and Adolescents: A Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment Manual , 1999 .

[21]  Richard I. Parker,et al.  The Relationship Between Visual Analysis and Five Statistical Analyses in a Simple AB Single-Case Research Design , 2006, Behavior modification.

[22]  John B. Willett,et al.  Understanding correlates of change by modeling individual differences in growth , 1985 .

[23]  John M Ferron,et al.  From a single-level analysis to a multilevel analysis of single-case experimental designs. , 2014, Journal of school psychology.

[24]  W. Goodman,et al.  Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale , 2017 .

[25]  Rumen Manolov,et al.  Recommendations for Choosing Single-Case Data Analytical Techniques. , 2017, Behavior therapy.

[26]  W. Silverman,et al.  Treating a heterogeneous set of anxiety disorders in youths with group cognitive behavioral therapy: A partially nonconcurrent multiple-baseline evaluation , 2002 .

[27]  Rumen Manolov,et al.  How Can Single-Case Data Be Analyzed? Software Resources, Tutorial, and Reflections on Analysis , 2017, Behavior modification.

[28]  Scott Bellini,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Video Modeling and Video Self-Modeling Interventions for Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorders , 2007 .

[29]  M. Feldman,et al.  Preliminary Randomized Trial of Function-Based Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy to Treat Obsessive Compulsive Behavior in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder , 2017 .

[30]  S. Maxwell Longitudinal designs in randomized group comparisons : When will intermediate observations increase statistical power ? , 1998 .

[31]  Scott Bellini,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Social Skills Interventions for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders , 2007 .

[32]  Michael Frankfurter,et al.  Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis Modeling Change And Event Occurrence , 2016 .

[33]  Phill Gagné,et al.  Augmenting Visual Analysis in Single-Case Research With Hierarchical Linear Modeling , 2013, Behavior modification.

[34]  S. Hayes,et al.  Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Self-Stigma Around Sexual Orientation: A Multiple Baseline Evaluation , 2012 .

[35]  K J Ottenbacher,et al.  Interrater agreement of visual analysis in single-subject decisions: quantitative review and analysis. , 1993, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[36]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[37]  Hubert Korzilius,et al.  Behavioral treatment of challenging behaviors in individuals with mild mental retardation: meta-analysis of single-subject research. , 2006, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[38]  Benjamin G. Solomon,et al.  Violations of Assumptions in School-Based Single-Case Data , 2014, Behavior modification.

[39]  Kimberly J. Vannest,et al.  Percentage of All Non-Overlapping Data (PAND) , 2007 .

[40]  Robert H. Horner,et al.  Single-Case Designs Technical Documentation. , 2010 .

[41]  John B. Willett,et al.  Questions and Answers in the Measurement of Change , 1988 .

[42]  W. Shadish,et al.  A standardized mean difference effect size for single case designs , 2012, Research synthesis methods.

[43]  William R. Jenson,et al.  Statistical reform: Evidence‐based practice, meta‐analyses, and single subject designs , 2007 .

[44]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  PND at 25 , 2013 .