Incorporating High Speed Passenger Rail into a Multimodal Network Model for Improved Regional Transportation Planning

With increasing demand and rising fuel costs, both travel time and cost of intercity passenger transportation are becoming increasingly significant. Around the world, high-speed rail (HSR) is seen as a way to mitigate the risk of volatile petroleum prices while alleviating demand on highways and at airports. Ridership is the critical element in determining the viability of a large capital, long-term transportation investment in terms of costs, revenue, and the resulting societal impacts. This research provides a systematic, consistent methodology for analyzing system wide modal ridership. The proposed methodology can be used to estimate the modal ridership under the proposed HSR network scenarios. The study analyzes the potential for high-speed rail as a part of the existing multimodal transportation system in a region in terms of ridership. Although this study does not explicitly consider capital costs, capital investment (e.g., network design and HSR speed), along with exogenous demographic, technological, economic, and policy trends, are used to project ridership over time. Population, fuel efficiency, HSR speed, and fuel price trends are the important variables considered for this study. The application of the methodology is two-fold, and the modeling approach makes a case for a fundamental shift from the current perspective of HSR viability. First, a user and community impact assessment (i.e., travel time, safety, and vehicle operating cost savings) of HSR is conducted in the same manner as traditional transportation system evaluation to provide comparative conclusions regarding intercity transportation alternatives. Emissions and energy consumption impacts are also considered due to the increasing national relevance of environmental sustainability and energy security. Second, the model presented in this study analyzes both ridership and impacts within the same systematic framework to assess the long-term impacts on the individual transportation modes, total system metrics, and efficacy of alternate policies. Although the methodology is extendable and modular to incorporate any mode in any region, experiments are conducted for the Midwest corridor in the United States. Average HSR speed is tested to demonstrate the model's ability to capture the sensitivity of ridership to a specific design consideration. This study represents an important step toward a consistent, comprehensive economic analysis of HSR in the United States

[1]  P Spaulding,et al.  NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS , 1983 .

[2]  Mark Hansen,et al.  Review of "Bay Area/California High-Speed Rail Ridership and Revenue Forecasting Study" , 2010 .

[3]  Kenneth A. Small,et al.  EFFICIENT ESTIMATION OF NESTED LOGIT MODELS , 1985 .

[4]  Richard S.J. Tol,et al.  The marginal damage costs of carbon-dioxide emissions’ , 2005 .

[5]  Ted R. Miller,et al.  THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF MOTOR VEHICLE CRASHES, 2000 , 2002 .

[6]  A. Meredith,et al.  UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE , 1999 .

[7]  F. Koppelman Independent Peer Review of the California High-Speed Rail Ridership and Revenue Forecasting Process , 2012 .

[8]  David J. Forkenbrock,et al.  GUIDEBOOK FOR ASSESSING THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS , 2001 .

[9]  W Cox,et al.  THE BEST INVESTMENT A NATION EVER MADE. A TRIBUTE TO THE DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER SYSTEM OF INTERSTATE AND DEFENSE HIGHWAYS. , 1996 .

[10]  M. J. Hutzler,et al.  Emissions of greenhouse gases in the United States , 1995 .

[11]  Daniel DeLaurentis,et al.  Analyzing the Potential for High-Speed Rail as Part of the Multimodal Transportation System in the Midwest Corridor , 2013 .

[12]  Antonio A. Trani,et al.  Forecasting Model for Air Taxi, Commercial Airline, and Automobile Demand in the United States , 2008 .

[14]  Frédéric Dobruszkes,et al.  High-speed rail and air transport competition in Western Europe: A supply-oriented perspective , 2011 .

[15]  Antonio Trani,et al.  Logit Models for Forecasting Nationwide Intercity Travel Demand in the United States , 2007 .

[16]  ECONorthwest,et al.  Estimating the Benefits and Costs of Public Transit Projects: A Guidebook for Practitioners , 2002 .

[17]  Samuel Labi,et al.  Transportation Decision Making: Principles of Project Evaluation and Programming , 2007 .

[18]  Antonio A. Trani,et al.  Integrated Model for Studying Small Aircraft Transportation System , 2003 .

[19]  Aditya S Joshi An integrated framework to study the interaction between on-demand air service and existing regional transportation system , 2010 .

[20]  Javier Campos,et al.  A review of HSR experiences around the world , 2007 .

[21]  M. Ball,et al.  Total Delay Impact Study: A Comprehensive Assessment of the Costs and Impacts of Flight Delay in the United States , 2010 .

[22]  Chris Nash,et al.  High-Speed Rail & Air Transport Competition , 2008 .

[23]  宮森 悠 ライブラリー Annual Energy Outlook 2000 , 2000 .

[24]  J. Goldberg Economic impact of motor vehicle crashes. , 2002, Annals of Emergency Medicine.

[25]  Fabio Santorini,et al.  Rail vs. Air transport for medium range trips , 2003 .

[26]  Gerald A. P. Carrothers An Historical Bedew of the Gravity and Potential Concepts of Human Interaction , 1956 .

[27]  Adib Kanafani,et al.  The Full Cost Of Intercity Transportation - A Comparison Of High Speed Rail, Air And Highway Transportation In California , 1996 .

[28]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  A Self Instructing Course in Mode Choice Modeling: Multinomial and Nested Logit Models , 2006 .

[29]  Roger E. Alcaly AGGREGATION AND GRAVITY MODELS: SOME EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE , 1967 .

[30]  A. Horvath,et al.  Environmental assessment of passenger transportation should include infrastructure and supply chains , 2009 .

[31]  R. Harvey,et al.  FULLY INCREMENTAL MODEL FOR TRANSIT RIDERSHIP FORECASTING: SEATTLE EXPERIENCE , 1994 .

[32]  Jitendra Sondhi,et al.  High-speed rail : the fast track to economic development? , 2010 .