Morphing Aircraft Sizing Using Design Optimization

This paper summarizes design optimization approaches for sizing a morphing aircraft for which the wing can make significant shape changes in flight. The approaches include single-level problems solved by gradient-free and gradient-based optimizers and a multilevel problem solved by gradient-based optimizers; of these, the multilevel approach proved most efficient. In the multilevel approach, a top-level problem minimizes the aircraft gross weight using reference design variables (T=W, S, AR, t=c, � , and � ), along with morphing limit variables describing the maximumshapechangeasafunctionofthereferencegeometry (e.g., � b, � c,and �� ).Asublevelproblemforeach mission segment determines an optimal wing-shape scheduling that minimizes fuel consumption, satisfies performance constraints, and operates within the geometric domain prescribed by the top-level problem. While the empty-weight buildup uses traditional predictors for fixed-geometry components, the wing weight prediction uses a parametric equation derived from structural optimization studies of morphing wings. The multilevel optimization approach then sizes an aircraft for which the wing can change sweep and root chord length, demonstrating: 1) the optimal wing-shape scheduling and maximum shape change for the morphing strategy, 2) the approach’s ability to facilitate continuousmorphingduringmissionsegmentanalysis,and3)improvedeffectiveness overprevioussinglelevel morphing aircraft sizing approaches.

[1]  Ron Barrett,et al.  Morphing wing flight control via postbuckled precompressed piezoelectric actuators , 2007 .

[2]  Sridhar Kota,et al.  Design of Compliant Mechanisms for Morphing Structural Shapes , 2003 .

[3]  William A. Crossley,et al.  Comparison of Morphing Wing Strategies Based Upon Aircraft Performance Impacts , 2004 .

[4]  William A. Crossley,et al.  Conceptual Morphing Aircraft Sizing Using a Multi-Level Optimization Strategy , 2008 .

[5]  Scott Zink,et al.  IMPACT OF ACTUATION CONCEPTS ON MORPHING AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES , 2004 .

[6]  Kroo Ilan,et al.  Multidisciplinary Optimization Methods for Aircraft Preliminary Design , 1994 .

[7]  Darryll J. Pines,et al.  Design and Testing of a Pneumatic Telescopic Wing for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2007 .

[8]  J. N. Kudva,et al.  Overview of the DARPA Smart Wing Project , 2004 .

[9]  Shaker A. Meguid,et al.  Shape morphing of aircraft wing: Status and challenges , 2010 .

[10]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Aircraft design using collaborative optimization , 1996 .

[11]  Anna-Maria Rivas McGowan,et al.  Recent results from NASA's morphing project , 2002, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[12]  Jeremy S. Agte,et al.  Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis , 1998 .

[13]  R. Decamp,et al.  Mission adaptive wing advanced research concepts , 1984 .

[14]  William A. Crossley,et al.  Modeling and Optimization for Morphing Wing Concept Generation II. Part 1; Morphing Wing Modeling and Structural Sizing Techniques , 2008 .

[15]  Brian D. Roth,et al.  APPLICATION OF OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUES IN THE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF MORPHING AIRCRAFT , 2003 .

[16]  Terrence A. Weisshaar,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of Morphing Technologies on Aircraft Performance , 2002 .

[17]  William A. Crossley,et al.  Developing Morphing Wing Weight Predictors with Emphasis on the Actuating Mechanism , 2006 .

[18]  Jayanth N. Kudva,et al.  Development of Next Generation Morphing Aircraft Structures , 2007 .

[19]  William A. Crossley,et al.  AIRCRAFT SIZING WITH MORPHING AS AN INDEPENDENT VARIABLE: MOTIVATION, STRATEGIES AND INVESTIGATIONS , 2002 .

[20]  Terrence A. Weisshaar,et al.  Validation of the Lockheed Martin Morphing Concept with Wind Tunnel Testing , 2007 .

[21]  Anna-Maria Rivas McGowan,et al.  The Aircraft Morphing Program , 1998 .

[22]  Dale M. Pitt,et al.  SAMPSON smart inlet design overview and wind tunnel test: I. Design overview , 2002, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[23]  William A. Crossley,et al.  Developing Response Surface Based Wing Weight Equations for Conceptual Morphing Air craft Sizing , 2005 .

[24]  John W. Gallman,et al.  Optimization of an Advanced Business Jet , 1997 .

[25]  William A. Crossley,et al.  Enabling Continuous Optimization for Sizing Morphing Aircraft Concepts , 2005 .

[26]  William A. Crossley,et al.  Modeling and Optimization for Morphing Wing Concept Generation , 2007 .

[27]  Sridhar Kota,et al.  Flight testing of Mission Adaptive Compliant Wing , 2007 .

[28]  Sridhar Kota,et al.  Static Shape Control of Smart Structures Using Compliant Mechanisms , 1999 .