What Research Says About MOOCs – An Explorative Content Analysis

Since the first offering of a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) in 2008, the body of literature on this new phenomenon of open learning has grown tremendously. In this regard, this article intends to identify and map patterns in research on MOOCs by reviewing 362 empirical articles published in peer-reviewed journals from 2008 to 2015. For the purposes of this study, a text-mining tool was used to analyse the content of the published research journal articles and to reveal the major themes and concepts covered in the publications. The findings reveal that the MOOC literature generally focuses on four lines of research: (a) the potential and challenges of MOOCs for universities; (b) MOOC platforms; (c) learners and content in MOOCs; and (d) the quality of MOOCs and instructional design issues. Prospective researchers may use these results to gain an overview of this emerging field, as well as to explore potential research directions.

[1]  Aras Bozkurt,et al.  Research Trends in Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Theses and Dissertations: Surfing the Tsunami Wave , 2016 .

[2]  K. Hew,et al.  Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges , 2014 .

[3]  Maureen Ebben,et al.  Unpacking MOOC scholarly discourse: a review of nascent MOOC scholarship , 2014 .

[4]  Robab Saadatdoost,et al.  Exploring MOOC from education and Information Systems perspectives: a short literature review , 2015 .

[5]  Malcolm Brown,et al.  A Report on the ELI Focus Session , 2012 .

[6]  J. Greene,et al.  Predictors of Retention and Achievement in a Massive Open Online Course , 2015 .

[7]  Rose Alinda Alias,et al.  Nascent research trends in MOOCs in higher educational institutions: A systematic literature review , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Web and Open Access to Learning (ICWOAL).

[8]  Nikola Stevanović Effects of motivation on performance of students in MOOC , 2014 .

[9]  Olaf Zawacki-Richter,et al.  Trends and Patterns in Massive Open Online Courses: Review and Content Analysis of Research on MOOCs (2008-2015) , 2017 .

[10]  Ebba Ossiannilsson,et al.  Perspectives on MOOC quality : An account of the EFQUEL MOOC Quality Project , 2014 .

[11]  Shirley Williams,et al.  MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012 , 2013 .

[12]  Sarah Porter,et al.  The economics of MOOCs: a sustainable future? , 2015 .

[13]  Aras Bozkurt,et al.  Bot-teachers in hybrid massive open online courses (MOOCs): A post-humanist experience , 2017, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology.

[14]  Sebastian Vogt,et al.  Review of distance education research (2000 to 2008): Analysis of research areas, methods, and authorship patterns , 2009 .

[15]  D. S. Calonge,et al.  MOOCs, Graduate Skills Gaps, and Employability: A Qualitative Systematic Review of the Literature. , 2016 .

[16]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Instructional quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[17]  C. Sinclair,et al.  Teacher Experiences and Academic Identity: The Missing Components of MOOC Pedagogy , 2014 .

[18]  Guy M. Goodwin,et al.  Introduction to Systematic Reviews , 2004, Journal of psychopharmacology.

[19]  Lorena Alemán de la Garza,et al.  Indicators of pedagogical quality for the design of a Massive Open Online Course for teacher training , 2015, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.

[20]  Jonathan Rosewell,et al.  The OpenupEd quality label: benchmarks for MOOCs , 2014 .

[21]  Andreas Polze,et al.  A Platform for Interactive Software Experiments in Massive Open Online Courses , 2014, J. Integr. Des. Process. Sci..

[22]  Wilfried Admiraal,et al.  Self- and Peer Assessment in Massive Open Online Courses , 2014 .

[23]  Zane L. Berge,et al.  Possibilities for MOOCs in Corporate Training and Development , 2015 .

[24]  Svenja Bedenlier,et al.  The battle for open: how openness won and why it doesn’t feel like victory , 2015 .

[25]  Sheldon Goldenberg,et al.  Gender, science and methodological preferences , 1991 .

[26]  Samar Zutshi,et al.  Experiences in MOOCs: The Perspective of Students , 2013 .

[27]  Alan Tait,et al.  What are open universities for? , 2008 .

[28]  Zhaoli Zhang,et al.  Students' Patterns of Engagement and Course Performance in Cloud-Classroom Courses , 2016, 2016 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET).

[29]  Marion Waite,et al.  Liminal Participants and Skilled Orienteers: Learner Participation in a MOOC for New Lecturers , 2013 .

[30]  M. Deimann The dark side of the MOOC - A critical inquiry on their claims and realities , 2015 .

[31]  Karl Steffens,et al.  Are MOOCs Promising Learning Environments , 2015 .

[32]  H. Gore,et al.  Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and Their Impact on Academic Library Services: Exploring the Issues and Challenges , 2014 .

[33]  Qiang Yang,et al.  Students Motivation in Asynchronous Online Discussions with MOOC Mode , 2014 .

[34]  C. Gallois,et al.  Mapping a 40-Year History With Leximancer: Themes and Concepts in the Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology , 2010 .

[35]  Matthew J. Hornsey,et al.  Using Computer-Aided Content Analysis to Map a Research Domain , 2012 .

[36]  George Veletsianos,et al.  Who Studies MOOCs? Interdisciplinarity in MOOC Research and Its Changes over Time. , 2015 .

[37]  Vicki S Conn,et al.  Meta-analysis research. , 2004, Journal of vascular nursing : official publication of the Society for Peripheral Vascular Nursing.

[38]  Gráinne Conole,et al.  Designing effective MOOCs , 2015 .

[39]  Stephen R. Ruth,et al.  Can MOOC’s and Existing E-Learning Efficiency Paradigms Help Reduce College Costs? , 2012 .

[40]  George Veletsianos,et al.  A Systematic Analysis and Synthesis of the Empirical MOOC Literature Published in 2013–2015 , 2016 .

[41]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  Making ‘MOOCs’: The Construction of a New Digital Higher Education within News Media Discourse , 2014 .

[42]  Timothy Read,et al.  Toward a Quality Model for UNED MOOCs , 2014 .

[43]  George Siemens,et al.  What public media reveals about MOOCs: A systematic analysis of news reports , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[44]  Olaf Zawacki-Richter,et al.  Mapping research trends from 35 years of publications in Distance Education , 2016 .

[45]  Ebba Ossiannilsson,et al.  Analysis of MOOCs practices from the perspective of learner experiences and quality culture , 2015 .

[46]  Rebecca Eynon,et al.  Communication patterns in massively open online courses , 2014, Internet High. Educ..

[47]  George Siemens,et al.  Where is research on massive open online courses headed? A data analysis of the MOOC research initiative , 2014 .

[48]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[49]  Vanesa Daza,et al.  MOOC attack: closing the gap between pre-university and university mathematics , 2013 .

[50]  Ian A. Harwood,et al.  Cross-Check for Completeness: Exploring a Novel Use of Leximancer in a Grounded Theory Study , 2015 .

[51]  Yan Li,et al.  Integrating MOOC and Flipped Classroom Practice in a Traditional Undergraduate Course: Students' Experience and Perceptions , 2015, Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn..

[52]  Andrew E. Smith,et al.  Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer concept mapping , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[53]  Karsten Lundqvist,et al.  MOOCS As A Method Of Distance Education In The Arab World – A Review Paper , 2015 .

[54]  Katy Mahraj Using Information Expertise to Enhance Massive Open Online Courses , 2012 .

[55]  Sara McNeil,et al.  Students' patterns of engagement and course performance in a Massive Open Online Course , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[56]  Fred G. Martin,et al.  Will massive open online courses change how we teach? , 2012, CACM.

[57]  Terry Anderson,et al.  META-ANALYSIS OF THE RESEARCH ABOUT MOOC DURING 2013-2014 , 2015 .

[58]  Jolie Kennedy,et al.  Characteristics of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): A Research Review, 2009-2012. , 2014 .

[59]  Donatella Persico,et al.  Methodological approaches in MOOC research: Retracing the myth of Proteus , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[60]  Christina Mune Massive Open Online Librarianship: Emerging Practices in Response to MOOCs , 2015 .

[61]  Olaf Zawacki-Richter,et al.  From the Back Door into the Mainstream: The Characteristics of Lifelong Learners , 2014 .

[62]  Min Yuan,et al.  Not All Rubrics Are Equal: A Review of Rubrics for Evaluating the Quality of Open Educational Resources , 2015 .

[63]  L. Carter Online distance education: Towards a research agenda. , 2014 .

[64]  郭金鈤,et al.  大規模開放式線上課程學習行為研究-以社交媒體資料探勘為例;Learning in Massive Open Online Courses:Evidence from Social Media Mining , 2015 .

[65]  Jean‐Charles Pomerol,et al.  What is a MOOC , 2015 .

[66]  Chien-Wen Shen,et al.  Learning in massive open online courses: Evidence from social media mining , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[67]  Javiera Atenas,et al.  Model for democratisation of the contents hosted in MOOCs , 2015, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.

[68]  Edmundo Tovar Caro,et al.  Seeking Open Educational Resources to Compose Massive Open Online Courses in Engineering Education An Approach based on Linked Open Data , 2015, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[69]  Gary R. Morrison,et al.  Designing Effective Instruction , 1997 .

[70]  Yong Chen,et al.  Investigating MOOCs through Blog Mining. , 2014 .

[71]  Vitor Rocio,et al.  iMOOC on Climate Change: Evaluation of a Massive Open Online Learning Pilot Experience , 2015 .

[72]  Julian Lin,et al.  Mapping 12 Years of Communication Scholarship: Themes and Concepts in the Journal of Communication , 2012, ICADL.

[73]  Sarah A. Webster,et al.  Learner Participation and Engagement in Open Online Courses: Insights from the Peer 2 Peer University , 2013 .

[74]  C. Osvaldo Rodriguez,et al.  MOOCs and the AI-Stanford Like Courses: Two Successful and Distinct Course Formats for Massive Open Online Courses. , 2012 .