Strengthening Virtual Learning Environments by Incorporating Modern Technologies

The current Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs) are significantly successful in empowering the organization of e-learning, however, lacking in giving personalization in learning. The plan of most VLEs is the course and instructor driven and not intended for students to build up individual pathways in learning. New transformative services, administrations, and modern technologies are now being used with learning. This paper gives a model of how the Personal Learning Environment (PLE) and VLE can mesh together for an enhanced e-learning environment with the support of modern technologies. The model has introduced some novel concepts to enhance existing VLE such as Fellows-Inspired Learning (FIL), the Extent of Friendship (EoF) scheme for friends’ suggestion, real-time querying support, and Scavenge (an enhanced search system) with e-learning environment. A prototype implementation of the proposed learning environment is also presented in this paper.

[1]  Eyke Hüllermeier,et al.  Imprecise Matching of Requirements Specifications for Software Services Using Fuzzy Logic , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[2]  Rita Kop,et al.  Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? , 2008 .

[3]  Olga Pilli,et al.  LMS Vs. SNS: Can Social Networking Sites Act as a Learning Management Systems? , 2014 .

[4]  Rosalina R. Estacio,et al.  Analyzing students online learning behavior in blended courses using Moodle , 2017, Asian Association of Open Universities Journal.

[5]  George Siemens Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age , 2004 .

[6]  Eduardo Gómez-Sánchez,et al.  GLUE!: An architecture for the integration of external tools in Virtual Learning Environments , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Alex Sandro Gomes,et al.  Towards the Formative Accompaniment in E-Learning: Conception of a Social Mechanism Between the Educational Contexts LMS and PLE. , 2014 .

[8]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  Opening Learning Management Systems to Personal Learning Environments , 2011, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[9]  Ray Archee,et al.  Reflections on Personal Learning Environments: Theory and Practice , 2012 .

[10]  Jochen Wittmann,et al.  Content management systems and e-learning systems -a symbiosis? , 2003, Proceedings 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Technologies.

[11]  Marina Keiko Nakayama,et al.  LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (LMS) AND E-LEARNING MANAGEMENT: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW AND RESEARCH AGENDA , 2015 .

[12]  Mehmet Emin Mutlu,et al.  On the track of Artificial Intelligence: Learning with Intelligent Personal Assistants , 2016 .

[13]  Hélène Fournier,et al.  Factors Affecting the Design and Development of a Personal Learning Environment: Research on Super-users , 2011, Int. J. Virtual Pers. Learn. Environ..

[14]  Alain Abran,et al.  Usability Meanings and Interpretations in ISO Standards , 2003, Software Quality Journal.

[15]  Catherine Faron-Zucker,et al.  An enhanced personal learning environment using social semantic web technologies , 2014, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[16]  Doo-Kwon Baik,et al.  A Social Learning Management System Supporting Feedback for Incorrect Answers based on Social Network Services , 2016, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[17]  Wendy Drexler,et al.  The networked student model for construction of personal learning environments: Balancing teacher control and student autonomy , 2010 .

[18]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Usability measurement and metrics: A consolidated model , 2006, Software Quality Journal.