Conceptualizing E-Inclusion in Europe: An Explanatory Study

The aim of this article is to conceptualize e-Inclusion and identify factors affecting it. A critical review of the literature is conducted to identify and categorize the factors influencing e-Inclusion into a comprehensive taxonomy. Using a survey questionnaire, the impact of these factors in influencing citizens' adoption of e-government services was examined. The findings highlight a number of factors under demographic, political, economic social, cultural, and infrastructural dimensions that can have a significant influence on e-Inclusion.

[1]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Understanding the complexity of electronic government: Implications from the digital divide literature , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[2]  A. Bryman.  Social Research Methods , 2001 .

[3]  P. Chapman.  Poverty and exclusion in rural Britain: The dynamics of low income and employment , 1998 .

[4]  France Bélanger,et al.  The utilization of e‐government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors * , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[5]  Paul Beynon-Davies,et al.  Constructing electronic government: the case of the UK inland revenue , 2005, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[6]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  Beyond the digital divide: Rethinking digital inclusion for the 21st century , 2007 .

[7]  Geoff Mulgan,et al.  Innovating better ways of living in later life , 2010 .

[8]  K. Seers.  Qualitative data analysis , 2011, Evidence Based Nursing.

[9]  Valerie Frissen.  ICTs in the Rush Hour of Life , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[10]  Ragnar Andreas Audunson,et al.  Technology and Social Inclusion. Rethinking the Digital Divide , 2006, J. Documentation.

[11]  J. J. Po-An Hsieh,et al.  Addressing Digital Inequality for the Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Through Government Initiatives: Forms of Capital That Affect ICT Utilization , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  E. Helsper.  Digital inclusion: an analysis of social disadvantage and the information society , 2008 .

[13]  Anne Power,et al.  Social Exclusion and the Future of Cities , 2000 .

[14]  J. V. Dijk.  Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings , 2006 .

[15]  S. Tefft.  Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide , 2002 .

[16]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Encouraging Citizen Adoption of eGovernment by Building Trust , 2002, Electron. Mark..

[17]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Research Note - Social Interactions and the "Digital Divide": Explaining Variations in Internet Use , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Daniela V. Dimitrova,et al.  Profiling the Adopters of E-Government Information and Services , 2006 .

[19]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[20]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  User acceptance of microcomputer technology: An empirical test , 1993 .

[21]  V. Venkatesh,et al.  AGE DIFFERENCES IN TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION DECISIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR A CHANGING WORK FORCE , 2000 .

[22]  J. Morse.  Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed): Mathew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994. Price: $65.00 hardback, $32.00 paperback. 238 pp , 1996 .

[23]  V. Weerakkody,et al.  Adoption and diffusion of free wireless internet parks in Qatar , 2010 .

[24]  J. L. Harrison,et al.  The Government Printing Office , 1968, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[25]  Karen Worcman.  Digital Division Is Cultural Exclusion. But Is Digital Inclusion Cultural Inclusion? , 2002, D Lib Mag..

[26]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  Reconsidering Political and Popular Understandings of the Digital Divide , 2004, New Media Soc..

[27]  E. Hargittai,et al.  Digital Inequality , 2008, Commun. Res..

[28]  Mariën,et al.  Embedding e-inclusion initiatives in people’s daily reality: The role of social networks in tackling the digital divide , 2010 .

[29]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  E-government adoption: A cultural comparison , 2008, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[30]  Philip E. T. Lewis,et al.  Research Methods for Business Students (2nd edition) , 2000 .

[31]  Henry H. Emurian,et al.  An overview of online trust: Concepts, elements, and implications , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  Philip E. T. Lewis,et al.  Research Methods for Business Students , 2006 .

[33]  Miguel P Caldas,et al.  Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches , 2003 .

[34]  P. Foley.  Does the Internet help to overcome social exclusion? , 2004 .

[35]  G. Anderson,et al.  Population aging: a comparison among industrialized countries. , 2000, Health affairs.

[36]  Frances M. Hill,et al.  E‐government: the realities of using IT to transform the public sector , 2003 .

[37]  J. C. Thomas,et al.  The New Face of Government: Citizen-Initiated Contacts in the Era of E-Government , 2003 .

[38]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Internet Access and Use in Context , 2004, New Media Soc..

[39]  E. Hargittai.  Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in Internet Skills and Uses among Members of the “Net Generation”* , 2010 .

[40]  Karine Nahon,et al.  Gaps and Bits: Conceptualizing Measurements for Digital Divide/s , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[41]  Sherman D. Hanna,et al.  The Effectiveness of Family Life Cycle Variables in Consumer Expenditure Research , 1983 .

[42]  Bruce Bimber.  Bimber Measuring the Gender Gap on the Internet , 2003 .

[43]  Glenn B. Voss,et al.  Determinants of online channel use and overall satisfaction with a relational, multichannel service provider , 2003 .

[44]  Carol Propper,et al.  Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion , 2001 .

[45]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  Digital Divide in eGovernment: The eInclusion Gap Model , 2008, EGOV.

[46]  P. Vedsted,et al.  A cluster-randomized trial of the significance of a reminder procedure in a patient evaluation survey in general practice. , 2006, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[47]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  Gradations in digital inclusion: children, young people and the digital divide , 2007, New Media Soc..

[48]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  From the 'Digital Divide' to 'Digital Inequality': Studying Internet Use as Penetration Increases , 2001 .

[49]  Bruce Bimber.  Measuring the Gender Gap on the Internet 1 , 2000 .

[50]  W. Kymlicka.  Introduction: An Emerging Consensus? , 1998 .

[51]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Model of Adoption and Technology in Households: A Baseline Model Test and Extension Incorporating Household Life Cycle , 2005, MIS Q..

[52]  France Bélanger,et al.  The impact of the digital divide on e-government use , 2009, CACM.

[53]  Helping Consumers with Low Literacy Interpret the New Food Label , 1997 .

[54]  France Bélanger,et al.  The Effects of the Digital Divide on E-Government: An Emperical Evaluation , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[55]  F. Anthias,et al.  The Concept of `Social Division' and Theorising Social Stratification: Looking at Ethnicity and Class , 2001 .

[56]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  The role of IT literacy in defining digital divide policy needs , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[57]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People's Online Skills , 2002, First Monday.

[58]  Petter Bae Brandtzæg,et al.  Children's usage of media technologies and psychosocial factors , 2007, New Media Soc..

[59]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  An Update on Survey Measures of Web-Oriented Digital Literacy , 2009 .

[60]  K. Kinsella,et al.  An aging world: 2008. , 2009 .

[61]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  Factors for Successful e‑Government Adoption: a Conceptual Framework , 2007 .

[62]  Ellen Helsper,et al.  The ageing internet: digital choice and exclusion among the elderly , 2009 .

[63]  E. Mordini,et al.  Ethics, e-Inclusion and Ageing , 2009 .

[64]  M. J. Moon,et al.  Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government , 2004 .

[65]  Amela Karahasanovic,et al.  Understanding the new digital divide - A typology of Internet users in Europe , 2011, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[66]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[67]  L. Phipps.  NEW COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES - A conduit for social inclusion , 2000 .

[68]  R. Rice,et al.  Comparing internet and mobile phone usage: digital divides of usage, adoption, and dropouts , 2003 .

[69]  Pieter Verdegem,et al.  Social Media for Digital and Social Inclusion: Challenges for Information Society 2.0 Research & Policies , 2011 .

[70]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use , 2004 .

[71]  Kush Wadhwa,et al.  Mainstreaming the e-excluded in Europe: strategies, good practices and some ethical issues , 2010, Ethics and Information Technology.

[72]  Pamela S. Schindler,et al.  Business research methods 12th ed. , 2014 .

[73]  Paul Manuel Aviles Baker,et al.  Adoption of information and communication technologies: key policy issues, barriers and opportunities for people with disabilities , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[74]  R. Eynon,et al.  Digital natives: where is the evidence? , 2010 .

[75]  Wallace Koehler,et al.  Virtual inequality: Beyond the digital divide , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[76]  W. Zikmund.  Business Research Methods , 1984 .

[77]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Digital Inequality , 2008, Commun. Res..

[78]  M. Chinn,et al.  ICT Use in the Developing World: An Analysis of Differences in Computer and Internet Penetration , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[79]  Janice C. Sipior,et al.  The digital divide and t-government in the United States: using the technology acceptance model to understand usage , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..