Energy component analysis of π interactions.

Fundamental features of biomolecules, such as their structure, solvation, and crystal packing and even the docking of drugs, rely on noncovalent interactions. Theory can help elucidate the nature of these interactions, and energy component analysis reveals the contributions from the various intermolecular forces: electrostatics, London dispersion terms, induction (polarization), and short-range exchange-repulsion. Symmetry-adapted perturbation theory (SAPT) provides one method for this type of analysis. In this Account, we show several examples of how SAPT provides insight into the nature of noncovalent π-interactions. In cation-π interactions, the cation strongly polarizes electrons in π-orbitals, leading to substantially attractive induction terms. This polarization is so important that a cation and a benzene attract each other when placed in the same plane, even though a consideration of the electrostatic interactions alone would suggest otherwise. SAPT analysis can also support an understanding of substituent effects in π-π interactions. Trends in face-to-face sandwich benzene dimers cannot be understood solely in terms of electrostatic effects, especially for multiply substituted dimers, but SAPT analysis demonstrates the importance of London dispersion forces. Moreover, detailed SAPT studies also reveal the critical importance of charge penetration effects in π-stacking interactions. These effects arise in cases with substantial orbital overlap, such as in π-stacking in DNA or in crystal structures of π-conjugated materials. These charge penetration effects lead to attractive electrostatic terms where a simpler analysis based on atom-centered charges, electrostatic potential plots, or even distributed multipole analysis would incorrectly predict repulsive electrostatics. SAPT analysis of sandwich benzene, benzene-pyridine, and pyridine dimers indicates that dipole/induced-dipole terms present in benzene-pyridine but not in benzene dimer are relatively unimportant. In general, a nitrogen heteroatom contracts the electron density, reducing the magnitude of both the London dispersion and the exchange-repulsion terms, but with an overall net increase in attraction. Finally, using recent advances in SAPT algorithms, researchers can now perform SAPT computations on systems with 200 atoms or more. We discuss a recent study of the intercalation complex of proflavine with a trinucleotide duplex of DNA. Here, London dispersion forces are the strongest contributors to binding, as is typical for π-π interactions. However, the electrostatic terms are larger than usual on a fractional basis, which likely results from the positive charge on the intercalator and its location between two electron-rich base pairs. These cation-π interactions also increase the induction term beyond those of typical noncovalent π-interactions.

[1]  A. Mazzanti,et al.  An experimental study on the effect of substituents on aromatic-aromatic interactions in dithia[3,3]-metaparacyclophanes. , 2012, Chemistry.

[2]  Krzysztof Szalewicz,et al.  Symmetry‐adapted perturbation theory of intermolecular forces , 2012 .

[3]  J. Herbert,et al.  Breakdown of the single-exchange approximation in third-order symmetry-adapted perturbation theory. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[4]  Lori A Burns,et al.  Basis set convergence of the coupled-cluster correction, δ(MP2)(CCSD(T)): best practices for benchmarking non-covalent interactions and the attendant revision of the S22, NBC10, HBC6, and HSG databases. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[5]  Gregory S. Tschumper,et al.  Probing the effects of heterogeneity on delocalized pi...pi interaction energies. , 2008, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[6]  S. Tsuzuki,et al.  Origin of attraction and directionality of the pi/pi interaction: model chemistry calculations of benzene dimer interaction. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[7]  C. David Sherrill,et al.  Highly Accurate Coupled Cluster Potential Energy Curves for the Benzene Dimer: Sandwich, T-Shaped, and Parallel-Displaced Configurations , 2004 .

[8]  C. Hunter,et al.  Substituent effects on edge-to-face aromatic interactions. , 2002, Chemistry.

[9]  Krzysztof Szalewicz,et al.  Efficient calculation of coupled Kohn-Sham dynamic susceptibility functions and dispersion energies with density fitting , 2005 .

[10]  C. Wilcox,et al.  Measurements of Molecular Electrostatic Field Effects in Edge-to-Face Aromatic Interactions and CH-π Interactions with Implications for Protein Folding and Molecular Recognition , 1998 .

[11]  Robert M Parrish,et al.  Large-scale symmetry-adapted perturbation theory computations via density fitting and Laplace transformation techniques: investigating the fundamental forces of DNA-intercalator interactions. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[12]  Edward F. Valeev,et al.  Estimates of the Ab Initio Limit for π−π Interactions: The Benzene Dimer , 2002 .

[13]  E. Bernstein,et al.  Aromatic van der Waals Clusters: Structure and Nonrigidity , 1996 .

[14]  C. Sherrill,et al.  Origin of the surprising enhancement of electrostatic energies by electron-donating substituents in substituted sandwich benzene dimers. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[15]  C. David Sherrill,et al.  Potential energy curves for cation-pi interactions: off-axis configurations are also attractive. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[16]  Ryan P. Lively,et al.  The Effect of Multiple Substituents on Sandwich and T‐Shaped π–π Interactions , 2006 .

[17]  C. David Sherrill,et al.  Wavefunction methods for noncovalent interactions , 2012 .

[18]  Dongwook Kim,et al.  Understanding of assembly phenomena by aromatic-aromatic interactions: benzene dimer and the substituted systems. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[19]  K. Houk,et al.  Theoretical studies of the Wilcox molecular torsion balance. Is the edge-to-face aromatic interaction important? , 1999, Organic letters.

[20]  Marcey L. Waters,et al.  Unexpected substituent effects in offset π-π stacked interactions in water , 2002 .

[21]  Masuhiro Mikami,et al.  The Origin of the Cation/π Interaction: The Significant Importance of the Induction in Li+ and Na+ Complexes , 2001 .

[22]  Steven E. Wheeler,et al.  Origin of substituent effects in edge-to-face aryl–aryl interactions , 2009, Molecular physics.

[23]  Edward G Hohenstein,et al.  Accurate Interaction Energies for Problematic Dispersion-Bound Complexes: Homogeneous Dimers of NCCN, P2, and PCCP. , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[24]  C. Wilcox,et al.  MOLECULAR TORSION BALANCE FOR WEAK MOLECULAR RECOGNITION FORCES. EFFECTS OF TILTED-T EDGE-TO-FACE AROMATIC INTERACTIONS ON CONFORMATIONAL SELECTION AND SOLID-STATE STRUCTURE , 1994 .

[25]  F. Diederich,et al.  Interactions with aromatic rings in chemical and biological recognition. , 2003, Angewandte Chemie.

[26]  M. Schütz,et al.  Density-functional theory-symmetry-adapted intermolecular perturbation theory with density fitting: a new efficient method to study intermolecular interaction energies. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[27]  Steven E Wheeler,et al.  Local nature of substituent effects in stacking interactions. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[28]  Steven E. Wheeler,et al.  Through-Space Effects of Substituents Dominate Molecular Electrostatic Potentials of Substituted Arenes. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[29]  C. David Sherrill,et al.  Density fitting and Cholesky decomposition approximations in symmetry-adapted perturbation theory: Implementation and application to probe the nature of π-π interactions in linear acenes , 2010 .

[30]  J. G. Vinter,et al.  Substituent effects on aromatic stacking interactions. , 2007, Organic & biomolecular chemistry.

[31]  B. Rice,et al.  Predicting structure of molecular crystals from first principles. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[32]  C. David Sherrill,et al.  Unexpected Substituent Effects in Face-to-Face π-Stacking Interactions , 2003 .

[33]  F. J. Luque,et al.  Theoretical Study of Alkyl-π and Aryl-π Interactions. Reconciling Theory and Experiment , 2002 .

[34]  Bobby G. Sumpter,et al.  Assessment of standard force field models against high‐quality ab initio potential curves for prototypes of π–π, CH/π, and SH/π interactions , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[35]  Eun Cheol Lee,et al.  How Different are Electron-Rich and Electron-Deficient π Interactions? , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[36]  C. David Sherrill,et al.  Substituent Effects in π−π Interactions: Sandwich and T-Shaped Configurations , 2004 .

[37]  Dong Young Kim,et al.  Comprehensive Energy Analysis for Various Types of π-Interaction. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[38]  Jay S. Siegel,et al.  Polar/.pi. interactions between stacked aryls in 1,8-diarylnaphthalenes , 1992 .

[39]  C. Hunter,et al.  Desolvation tips the balance: solvent effects on aromatic interactions. , 2006, Chemical communications.

[40]  D. A. Dougherty,et al.  Cation-π Interactions in Chemistry and Biology: A New View of Benzene, Phe, Tyr, and Trp , 1996, Science.

[41]  J. Černý,et al.  Double-helical --> ladder structural transition in the B-DNA is induced by a loss of dispersion energy. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[42]  Mark D. Smith,et al.  A high-barrier molecular balance for studying face-to-face arene-arene interactions in the solid state and in solution. , 2009, Chemistry.

[43]  F. Diederich,et al.  Aromatic Rings in Chemical and Biological Recognition: Energetics and Structures , 2011 .

[44]  Steven E. Wheeler,et al.  Probing substituent effects in aryl-aryl interactions using stereoselective Diels-Alder cycloadditions. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[45]  Steven E. Wheeler,et al.  Substituent effects in the benzene dimer are due to direct interactions of the substituents with the unsubstituted benzene. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[46]  C. Sherrill,et al.  Effects of heteroatoms on aromatic pi-pi interactions: benzene-pyridine and pyridine dimer. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[47]  Ashley L. Ringer,et al.  Substituent effects in sandwich configurations of multiply substituted benzene dimers are not solely governed by electrostatic control. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[48]  C. Hunter,et al.  Desolvation and substituent effects in edge-to-face aromatic interactions. , 2009, Chemical communications.

[49]  C. Wolf,et al.  Highly congested nondistorted diheteroarylnaphthalenes: model compounds for the investigation of intramolecular pi-stacking interactions. , 2005, The Journal of organic chemistry.

[50]  R. Gaylord unpublished results , 1985 .

[51]  K. Houk,et al.  Substituent effects in cation/pi interactions and electrostatic potentials above the centers of substituted benzenes are due primarily to through-space effects of the substituents. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[52]  Jan Sunner,et al.  Ion-solvent molecule interactions in the gas phase. The potassium ion and benzene , 1981 .

[53]  Yoon Sup Lee,et al.  π–π Interaction energies in monosubstituted-benzene dimers in parallel- and antiparallel-displaced conformations , 2009 .

[54]  C. Sherrill,et al.  Substituent effects in parallel-displaced pi-pi interactions. , 2008, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[55]  Christopher A. Hunter,et al.  The nature of .pi.-.pi. interactions , 1990 .

[56]  Robert Moszynski,et al.  Perturbation Theory Approach to Intermolecular Potential Energy Surfaces of van der Waals Complexes , 1994 .

[57]  L. K. Hardebeck,et al.  Face-to-face arene-arene binding energies: dominated by dispersion but predicted by electrostatic and dispersion/polarizability substituent constants. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.