a Geometric Processing Workflow for Transforming Reality-Based 3d Models in Volumetric Meshes Suitable for Fea

Abstract. Conservation of Cultural Heritage is a key issue and structural changes and damages can influence the mechanical behaviour of artefacts and buildings. The use of Finite Elements Methods (FEM) for mechanical analysis is largely used in modelling stress behaviour. The typical workflow involves the use of CAD 3D models made by Non-Uniform Rational B-splines (NURBS) surfaces, representing the ideal shape of the object to be simulated. Nowadays, 3D documentation of CH has been widely developed through reality-based approaches, but the models are not suitable for a direct use in FEA: the mesh has in fact to be converted to volumetric, and the density has to be reduced since the computational complexity of a FEA grows exponentially with the number of nodes. The focus of this paper is to present a new method aiming at generate the most accurate 3D representation of a real artefact from highly accurate 3D digital models derived from reality-based techniques, maintaining the accuracy of the high-resolution polygonal models in the solid ones. The approach proposed is based on a wise use of retopology procedures and a transformation of this model to a mathematical one made by NURBS surfaces suitable for being processed by volumetric meshers typically embedded in standard FEM packages. The strong simplification with little loss of consistency possible with the retopology step is used for maintaining as much coherence as possible between the original acquired mesh and the simplified model, creating in the meantime a topology that is more favourable for the automatic NURBS conversion.

[1]  Maarten Vergauwen,et al.  Implementation of Scan-to-BIM and FEM for the Documentation and Analysis of Heritage Timber Roof Structures , 2016, EuroMed.

[2]  K. Höllig Finite element methods with B-splines , 1987 .

[3]  G. Wheeler,et al.  The Treatment of Tullio Lombardo’s Adam: A New Approach to the Conservation of Monumental Marble Sculpture , 2014, Metropolitan Museum Journal.

[4]  Gabriele Bitelli,et al.  From Laser Scanning to Finite Element Analysis of Complex Buildings by Using a Semi-Automatic Procedure , 2015, Sensors.

[5]  V. Shapiro,et al.  Finite element analysis in situ , 2011 .

[6]  Aykut Erkal,et al.  Value and Vulnerability Assessment of a Historic Tomb for Conservation , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[7]  Vadim Shapiro,et al.  Geometric Issues in Computer Aided Design/Computer Aided Engineering Integration , 2011, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[8]  Gabriele Guidi,et al.  Displacement Mapping as a Metric Tool for Optimizing Mesh Models Originated by 3D Digitization , 2016, ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage.

[9]  Igor G. Tsukanov,et al.  Meshfree simulation of deforming domains , 1999, Comput. Aided Des..

[10]  Daniela Oreni,et al.  Survey turned into HBIM: the restoration and the work involved concerning the Basilica di Collemaggio after the earthquake (L'Aquila) , 2014 .

[11]  Philip F. Brune,et al.  Roman Concrete Vaulting in the Great Hall of Trajan’s Markets: Structural Evaluation , 2012 .

[12]  Fernando Zvietcovich,et al.  3D solid model updating of complex ancient monumental structures based on local geometrical meshes , 2015, Digit. Appl. Archaeol. Cult. Heritage.

[13]  Pedro Arias,et al.  Photogrammetric 3D modelling and mechanical analysis of masonry arches: An approach based on a discontinuous model of voussoirs , 2011 .

[14]  Denis Laurendeau,et al.  A General Surface Approach to the Integration of a Set of Range Views , 1995, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[15]  Olga Sorkine-Hornung,et al.  Instant field-aligned meshes , 2015, ACM Trans. Graph..

[16]  Leila De Floriani,et al.  A pyramidal data structure for triangle-based surface description , 1989, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.