Is limited delegation of separation assurance promising?

This paper presents an initial evaluation of the concept of limited delegation of separation assurance to the aircraft. The proposed concept relies on a key element – the “flexible use of delegation” – allowing each controller to select the most appropriate delegation level for each situation. Two classes of application are considered: crossing and passing in en-route airspace and sequencing in terminal areas. This initial evaluation has been set up to collect feedback from controllers and pilots, and to assess the operational feasibility and potential merit of the concept. The overall feeling can be summarised by “promising with a great potential”. This concept would allow an increase of controller availability. In addition, the flexible use of delegation would provide flexibility to use the method under different conditions – traffic, airspace, practice level – and would also enable a gradual confidence building in the method. It has been observed however that the non respect of the applicability conditions of the method could result in an increase of workload and communication. The upcoming step will be a “quantitative” experiment with the objective of evaluating expected gains.

[1]  Amy R. Pritchett Simultaneous design of cockpit display of traffic information and air traffic management procedures , 1998 .

[2]  Kevin M. Corker,et al.  MEASURING CONTROLLER REACTIONS TO FREE FLIGHT IN A COMPLEX TRANSITION SECTOR , 1999 .

[3]  Vernol Battiste,et al.  A Cockpit Display Designed to Enable Limited Flight Deck Separation Responsibility , 2013 .

[4]  V. N. Duong,et al.  Conflict Resolution Advisory Service in autonomous aircraft operations , 1997, 16th DASC. AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Reflections to the Future. Proceedings.

[5]  S. Gronlund,et al.  Situation Awareness , 2006 .

[6]  M R Endsley,et al.  Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[7]  Eric Hoffman,et al.  Initial Evaluation of Limited Delegation of Separation Assurance to the Cockpit , 1999 .

[8]  Vernol Battiste,et al.  Development and Demonstration of a Prototype Free Flight Cockpit Display of Traffic Information , 2013 .

[9]  Nicolas Durand,et al.  FACES: A Free Flight Autonomous and Coordinated Embarked Solver , 1998 .

[10]  Thierry Miquel,et al.  Operational assessment of co-operative ASAS applications , 1998 .

[11]  Jacco M. Hoekstra,et al.  The Transition Towards Free Flight: A Human Factors Evaluation of Mixed Equipage, Integrated Air-Ground, Free Flight ATM Scenarios , 1999 .

[12]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Pilot Performance and Workload Using Traffic Displays to Support Free Flight , 1998 .

[13]  P. Cashion,et al.  A study of commercial flight crew self-separation , 1997, 16th DASC. AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Reflections to the Future. Proceedings.

[14]  R. John Hansman,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF INTENT INFORMATION ON COCKPIT TRAFFIC DISPLAYS , 1999 .

[15]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Design of cockpit displays for limited delegation of separation assurance , 1999, Gateway to the New Millennium. 18th Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH37033).