How consumer valuation heterogeneity impacts firms' profit: Peer influence makes a difference

Abstract Consumers often have heterogeneous valuations for a product. However, no study has analyzed how this heterogeneity impacts firms’ profit, particularly when consumers’ purchase decisions depend on not only their own valuation but also their peers’ product choices. This study fills that gap by theoretically examining the role of consumer valuation heterogeneity in a firm’s profit. We demonstrate that when there is no peer influence among consumers, a firm’s profit decreases when consumers are more variant in their product valuations. However, when peer influence is strong, a certain level of valuation heterogeneity can increase the firm’s profit. This is because valuation heterogeneity gives the firm an opportunity to charge a higher price when it can rely consumers who highly value the product to influence the remaining consumers’ purchase intention. Although this higher price will initially result in a lower adoption rate, the firm will eventually achieve a higher profit with intense peer influence.

[1]  A. Arvidsson Brands: Meaning and Value in Media Culture , 2006 .

[2]  Tsan-Ming Choi,et al.  Selling luxury fashion online with social influences considerations: Demand changes and supply chain coordination , 2017 .

[3]  Paul Feldwick,et al.  Do we really need ‘Brand Equity’? , 1996 .

[4]  Zizhuo Wang,et al.  Information Disclosure and Pricing Policies for Sales of Network Goods , 2018, Oper. Res..

[5]  Xiaoqing Wang,et al.  Dynamic Pricing on E-commerce Platform with Deep Reinforcement Learning , 2019, ArXiv.

[6]  Oliver Hinz,et al.  Price Discrimination in E-Commerce? An Examination of Dynamic Pricing in Name-Your-Own Price Markets , 2011, MIS Q..

[7]  Heterogeneity in price sensitivity and retail price discrimination , 1998 .

[8]  R. McAfee,et al.  Dynamic pricing in the airline industry , 2007 .

[9]  Miguel Godinho de Matos,et al.  Peer Influence in the Diffusion of iPhone 3G over a Large Social Network , 2014, MIS Q..

[10]  Bernard Cova,et al.  Tribal marketing: The tribalisation of society and its impact on the conduct of marketing , 2002 .

[11]  Nancy L. Stokey Intertemporal Price Discrimination , 1979 .

[12]  Ellen Garbarino,et al.  Dynamic pricing in internet retail: Effects on consumer trust , 2003 .

[13]  Kenneth Gillingham,et al.  Peer Effects in the Diffusion of Solar Photovoltaic Panels , 2012, Mark. Sci..

[14]  Ravi Bapna,et al.  Do Your Online Friends Make You Pay? A Randomized Field Experiment on Peer Influence in Online Social Networks - Online E-Companion Appendix , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[15]  Xiaona Zheng,et al.  Multi-period pricing in the presence of competition and social influence , 2020 .

[16]  K. Roberts,et al.  Lovemarks: The Future Beyond Brands , 2004 .

[17]  F. Muñoz,et al.  Demystifying Social Media , 2010 .

[18]  Kevin Lane Keller Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity , 1997 .

[19]  William B. Dodds,et al.  Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations , 1991 .

[20]  D. Aaker MEASURING BRAND EQUITY ACROSS PRODUCTS AND MARKETS , 1996 .

[21]  Robert A. Shumsky,et al.  Dynamic Revenue Management in Airline Alliances , 2010, Transp. Sci..

[22]  R. Canniford,et al.  How to manage consumer tribes , 2011 .

[23]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations 1 , 2019, An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research.

[24]  A. Payne,et al.  Customer Advocacy: A Distinctive Form of Word of Mouth , 2020, Journal of Service Research.

[25]  Andrea Fronzetti Colladon,et al.  Put your money where your mouth is: Using deep learning to identify consumer tribes from word usage , 2020, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[26]  Kevin Lane Keller Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity , 1993 .

[27]  V. Srinivasan,et al.  An Approach to the Measurement, Analysis, and Prediction of Brand Equity and Its Sources , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[28]  Lawrence Feick,et al.  The Effects of Preference Heterogeneity and Source Characteristics on Ad Processing and Judgements about Endorsers , 1992 .

[29]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[30]  B. Snoj,et al.  The relationships among perceived quality, perceived risk and perceived product value , 2004 .

[31]  Andrea Fronzetti Colladon,et al.  Studying the association of online brand importance with museum visitors: An application of the semantic brand score , 2021, ArXiv.

[32]  Andrea Fronzetti Colladon,et al.  The Semantic Brand Score , 2018, ArXiv.

[33]  Thomas W. Valente,et al.  Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[34]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Marketing models of consumer heterogeneity , 1998 .

[35]  S. Senthilnathan,et al.  The Relationship of Brand Equity to Purchase Intention , 2011 .

[36]  J. Roosen,et al.  Consumer Heterogeneity in the Willingness to Pay for Local and Organic Food , 2015 .

[37]  Yong Liu,et al.  Social Learning in Networks of Friends versus Strangers , 2014, Mark. Sci..