Patient movement and motion artefacts in cone beam computed tomography of the dentomaxillofacial region: a systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVES To undertake a systematic review on the current knowledge regarding patient movement detection and patient motion artefacts related to cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging of the dentomaxillofacial region. METHODS The MEDLINE (PubMed) bibliographic database was searched for a period up to June 2015 for studies evaluating patient movement and/or motion artefacts in CBCT. The search strategy was restricted to English language publications using the following combined terms: (movement OR motion) AND (CBCT OR cone beam CT). RESULTS The search strategy yielded eight publications, which qualitatively or quantitatively evaluated patient movement and/or patient motion artefacts in CBCT. CONCLUSIONS The literature suggests that patient movement usually presents itself in CBCT images as stripe-like and ring-like patterns, double bone contours, and overall lack of sharpness. Studies monitoring patients during CBCT examination reported a prevalence of movement in approximately 20% of the cases, and studies based on image artefact recognition to define patient movement reported prevalence as high as 41.5%. There seems to be a consensus on the fact that young patients (children and adolescents) often move during the examination.

[1]  S. Mukherji,et al.  Conebeam CT of the Head and Neck, Part 2: Clinical Applications , 2009, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[2]  G. Swennen,et al.  Cone beam CT: non-dental applications. , 2013, JBR-BTR : organe de la Societe royale belge de radiologie (SRBR) = orgaan van de Koninklijke Belgische Vereniging voor Radiologie.

[3]  G. Swennen,et al.  Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. , 2009, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[4]  Reza R. Adhami,et al.  A head motion measurement system suitable for 3D cone-beam tomography using markers , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[5]  Stuart C. White,et al.  CONE-BEAM IMAGING IN DENTISTRY , 2008, Health physics.

[6]  R Jacobs,et al.  CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable? , 2015, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[7]  A Wenzel,et al.  Variation in voxel value distribution and effect of time between exposures in six CBCT units. , 2014, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[8]  A. Wenzel,et al.  Standardized method to quantify the variation in voxel value distribution in patient-simulated CBCT data sets. , 2015, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[9]  A Wenzel,et al.  Cone beam CT image artefacts related to head motion simulated by a robot skull: visual characteristics and impact on image quality. , 2013, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[10]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Determining Optical Flow , 1981, Other Conferences.

[11]  A. Farman,et al.  Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: essence, elements and steps to interpretation. , 2012, Australian dental journal.

[12]  J B Ludlow,et al.  Effective dose of dental CBCT-a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units. , 2015, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[13]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  R Schulze,et al.  Artefacts in CBCT: a review. , 2011, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[15]  Claudia Borri,et al.  Metal and motion artifacts by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in dental and maxillofacial study , 2015, La radiologia medica.

[16]  H. Bosmans,et al.  Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[17]  K. Prazdny Determining The Instantaneous Direction Of Motion From Optical Flow Generated By A Curvilinearly Moving Observer , 1981, Other Conferences.

[18]  K Donaldson,et al.  Dental cone beam CT image quality possibly reduced by patient movement. , 2013, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[19]  A. Wenzel,et al.  Factors affecting patient movement and re-exposure in cone beam computed tomography examination. , 2015, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[20]  T. Marchant,et al.  Reduction of motion artefacts in on-board cone beam CT by warping of projection images. , 2011, The British journal of radiology.

[21]  D Brüllmann,et al.  Spatial resolution in CBCT machines for dental/maxillofacial applications-what do we know today? , 2015, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[22]  Jaroslav Dusek,et al.  Movement of the patient and the cone beam computed tomography scanner: objectives and possible solutions. , 2013, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[23]  S. Mukherji,et al.  Conebeam CT of the Head and Neck, Part 1: Physical Principles , 2009, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[24]  M. Yoon,et al.  Respiratory motional effect on cone-beam CT in lung radiation surgery. , 2009, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[25]  Do-Gyoon Kim Can Dental Cone Beam Computed Tomography Assess Bone Mineral Density? , 2014, Journal of bone metabolism.

[26]  Tomáš Hanzelka,et al.  Reduction of the negative influence of patient motion on quality of CBCT scan. , 2010, Medical hypotheses.

[27]  A Wenzel,et al.  Radiographic observers' ability to recognize patient movement during cone beam CT. , 2014, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[28]  T. Akiba Utility of three-dimensional computed tomography in general thoracic surgery , 2013, General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

[29]  R Jacobs,et al.  Dose distribution for dental cone beam CT and its implication for defining a dose index. , 2012, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[30]  Ulrich Schwanecke,et al.  Automated detection of patient movement during a CBCT scan based on the projection data. , 2015, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.