Symptoms of immediate chlorhexidine hypersensitivity in patients with a positive prick test

There are numerous reports of anaphylaxis from chlorhexidine in surgical operations and other medical procedures, usually due to its application to wounds or mucous membranes. We wanted to analyse the clinical data of patients with a positive chlorhexidine prick test and perform some additional testing. We studied the case records of the patients with a positive chlorhexidine prick test and performed an open application test and tests for specific IgE. We found 33 patients with a positive prick test. 10 of them had had severe symptoms from chlorhexidine, and 11 had had only mild local symptoms. The size of the prick test reaction was mainly in line with the strength of the severest symptoms. Small 3‐ to 4‐mm reactions were usually without obvious clinical relevance. Specific IgE could be demonstrated in 6 patients out of 14 tested by the ImmunoCAP™ method. Besides severe attacks, patients with a positive prick test often have milder local symptoms, such as exacerbation of dermatitis. Local symptoms from chlorhexidine‐containing products may precede severe attacks. We recommend a prick test to be performed routinely when symptoms during medical interventional procedures, e.g. local and general anaesthesia, are investigated.

[1]  T. Jermann,et al.  Chlorhexidine anaphylaxis: case report and review of the literature , 2004, Contact dermatitis.

[2]  R. Rycroft,et al.  Allergic contact dermatitis from chlorhexidine. , 2004, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[3]  H. Maibach,et al.  Immunological Contact Urticaria and Anaphylaxis to Chlorhexidine: Overview , 2002, Exogenous Dermatology.

[4]  R. Lockey,et al.  Anaphylaxis: a review of causes and mechanisms. , 2002, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[5]  R. Puy,et al.  Chlorhexidine anaphylaxis: a case report and review of the literature , 2001, Internal medicine journal.

[6]  J. Bousquet,et al.  A revised nomenclature for allergy. An EAACI position statement from the EAACI nomenclature task force. , 2001 .

[7]  J. Bousquet,et al.  A revised nomenclature for allergy: An EAACI position statement from the EAACI nomenclature task force , 2001, Allergy.

[8]  Weiner,et al.  Anaphylaxis to chlorhexidine. Case report. Implication of immunoglobulin E antibodies and identification of an allergenic determinant , 2000, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[9]  J. Desmeules,et al.  Anaphylactic shock induced by intraurethral use of chlorhexidine , 1999, Allergy.

[10]  S. Mäkinen‐Kiljunen Banana allergy in patients with immediate-type hypersensitivity to natural rubber latex: characterization of cross-reacting antibodies and allergens. , 1994, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[11]  D. Stanworth,et al.  The incidence of IgE and IgG antibodies to chlorhexidine , 1989, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[12]  P. Susitaival,et al.  Anaphylactic Allergy to Chlorhexidine Cream , 1989 .

[13]  A Bergqvist-Karlsson,et al.  Delayed and immediate‐type hypersensitivity to chlorhexidine , 1988, Contact dermatitis.

[14]  K. Tadokoro,et al.  IgE antibody‐mediated shock reaction caused by topical application of chlorhexidine , 1986, Clinical allergy.

[15]  K. Nishioka,et al.  Histamine release in contact urticaria , 1984, Contact dermatitis.