Top-down processing and the suffix effect in young and older adults

The suffix effect has generally been viewed as reflecting an automatic component involving the terminal item and a component susceptible to top-down influences involving the preterminal items (Balota & Engle, 1981). Recent findings have raised questions about this widely accepted view of the suffix effect by showing that the terminal component is not insensitive to top-down influences (Bloom & Watkins, 1999). In the present study, we attempted to uncover the source of these contradictory findings by assessing whether the terminal items susceptibility to top-down influences might depend on subjects first-hand experience of the extent to which recall is affected by the suffix. Furthermore, we examined whether age differences in the suffix effect could be attributed to age-related declines in inhibitory processes. Our findings supported both predictions.

[1]  Catherine G. Penney,et al.  Elimination of the suffix effect on preterminal list items with unpredictable list length: Evidence for a dual model of suffix effects. , 1985 .

[2]  S. Connelly,et al.  Age and reading: the impact of distraction. , 1991, Psychology and aging.

[3]  S. R. Parkinson,et al.  Aging, digit span, and the stimulus suffix effect. , 1980, Journal of gerontology.

[4]  P. Rabbitt,et al.  Cognitive Models of Ageing and Frontal Lobe Deficits , 1997 .

[5]  L. Hasher,et al.  Directed ignoring: Inhibitory regulation of working memory. , 1994 .

[6]  R. Engle,et al.  Voice change in the stimulus suffix effect: Are the effects structural or strategic? , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[7]  Robert G. Crowder,et al.  Mechanisms of auditory backward masking in the stimulus suffix effect. , 1978, Psychological review.

[8]  H. Taub Memory span, practice, and aging. , 1973, Journal of gerontology.

[9]  R. G. Crowder,et al.  Modality and suffix effects in the absence of auditory stimulation , 1984 .

[10]  W. C. Shipley A Self-Administering Scale for Measuring Intellectual Impairment and Deterioration , 1940 .

[11]  R. G. Crowder,et al.  Precategorical acoustic storage (PAS) , 1969 .

[12]  J. Vousden,et al.  Adult age differences in short-term memory for serial order: data and a model. , 1999, Psychology and aging.

[13]  Robert G. Crowder,et al.  The sound of vowels and consonants in immediate memory , 1971 .

[14]  N. Cowan On short and long auditory stores. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  David Friedman,et al.  Dissociations between memory for temporal order and recognition memory in aging , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  S. Connelly,et al.  Aging, distraction, and the benefits of predictable location. , 1995, Psychology and aging.

[17]  H. Taub,et al.  The effects of practice on short-term memory of young and old subjects. , 1972, Journal of gerontology.

[18]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Speed of processing in normal aging: effects of speech rate, linguistic structure, and processing time. , 1985, Journal of gerontology.

[19]  S K Manning,et al.  Visual and auditory modality and suffix effects in young and elderly adults. , 1990, Experimental aging research.

[20]  M. Watkins,et al.  Adapting to an irrelevant item in an immediate recall task , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[21]  Lance C. Bloom,et al.  Two-component theory of the suffix effect: contrary findings. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  Randall W. Engle,et al.  Structural and strategic factors in the stimulus suffix effect , 1981 .

[23]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Working Memory, Comprehension, and Aging: A Review and a New View , 1988 .