Finding the optimal shape of the leading-and-trailing car of a high-speed train using design-by-morphing

We present a new, general design method, called design-by-morphing for an object whose performance is determined by its shape due to hydrodynamic, aerodynamic, structural, or thermal requirements. To illustrate the method, we design a new leading-and-trailing car of a train by morphing existing, baseline leading-and-trailing cars to minimize the drag. In design-by-morphing, the morphing is done by representing the shapes with polygonal meshes and spectrally with a truncated series of spherical harmonics. The optimal design is found by computing the optimal weights of each of the baseline shapes so that the morphed shape has minimum drag. As a result of optimization, we found that with only two baseline trains that mimic current high-speed trains with low drag that the drag of the optimal train is reduced by $$8.04\%$$8.04% with respect to the baseline train with the smaller drag. When we repeat the optimization by adding a third baseline train that under-performs compared to the other baseline train, the drag of the new optimal train is reduced by $$13.46\%$$13.46%. This finding shows that bad examples of design are as useful as good examples in determining an optimal design. We show that design-by-morphing can be extended to many engineering problems in which the performance of an object depends on its shape.

[1]  Daniel J Poole,et al.  Application of Control Point-Based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization to Two-Dimensional Drag Minimization , 2014 .

[2]  K. Vanaja,et al.  Design of Experiments: Concept and Applications of Plackett Burman Design , 2007 .

[3]  Moo K. Chung,et al.  General multivariate linear modeling of surface shapes using SurfStat , 2010, NeuroImage.

[4]  YiRan An,et al.  Optimization of the head shape of the CRH3 high speed train , 2010 .

[5]  Claude Fleury,et al.  A unified parametric design approach to structural shape optimization , 1995 .

[6]  Martín Abadi,et al.  TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems , 2016, ArXiv.

[7]  Hong-qi Tian Formation mechanism of aerodynamic drag of high-speed train and some reduction measures , 2009 .

[8]  William H. Press,et al.  Computing Accurate Integrals with the FFT , 1989 .

[9]  Marc Alexa,et al.  As-rigid-as-possible surface modeling , 2007, Symposium on Geometry Processing.

[10]  Charles Hirsch,et al.  Application of Multipoint Optimization to the Design of Turbomachinery Blades , 2004 .

[11]  Carsten Proppe,et al.  Cross-wind effects on road and rail vehicles , 2009 .

[12]  Deniz Baş,et al.  Modeling and optimization I: Usability of response surface methodology , 2007 .

[13]  Imran A. Tasadduq,et al.  Response surface methodology: A neural network approach , 1997 .

[14]  Feng Liu,et al.  Multi-Objective Design Optimization of a Transonic Compressor Rotor Using an Adjoint Equation Method , 2013 .

[15]  J. Samareh Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Based on Free-form Deformation , 2004 .

[16]  Ju Young Kang Design of Marine Structures Through Morphing Method and Its Supporting Techniques , 2014 .

[17]  W. DuMouchel,et al.  A simple Bayesian modification of D-optimal designs to reduce dependence on an assumed model , 1994 .

[18]  Lizhuang Ma,et al.  A new free-form deformation through the control of parametric surfaces , 1996, Comput. Graph..

[19]  T. Pulliam,et al.  Multipoint and Multi-Objective Aerodynamic Shape Optimization , 2002 .

[20]  Mark Meyer,et al.  Intrinsic Parameterizations of Surface Meshes , 2002, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[21]  Fillia Makedon,et al.  A surface-based approach for classification of 3D neuroanatomic structures , 2004, Intell. Data Anal..

[22]  Lars Davidson,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulation of the Flow Around a Simplified High Speed Train Under the Influence of a Cross-Wind , 2005 .

[23]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes , 1990 .

[24]  Manfredo P. do Carmo,et al.  Differential geometry of curves and surfaces , 1976 .

[25]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators , 1989, Neural Networks.

[26]  Mohammad Hassan Shojaeefard,et al.  Shape optimization of draft tubes for Agnew microhydro turbines , 2014 .

[27]  Javier García,et al.  Genetically aerodynamic optimization of the nose shape of a high-speed train entering a tunnel , 2014 .

[28]  Adjoint-Based, CAD-Free Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of High-Speed Trains , 2016 .

[29]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  Response surface methodology for constrained simulation optimization: An overview , 2008, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[30]  Antonio Crespo,et al.  AERODYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION OF THE NOSE SHAPE OF A TRAIN USING THE ADJOINT METHOD , 2015 .

[31]  Vadim Shapiro,et al.  Shape optimization with topological changes and parametric control , 2007 .

[32]  Claudio Canuto,et al.  Spectral Methods: Evolution to Complex Geometries and Applications to Fluid Dynamics (Scientific Computation) , 2007 .

[33]  T. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric analysis : CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement , 2005 .

[35]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Investigations of the Common Research Model Wing Benchmark , 2015 .

[36]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Shape optimization of pulsatile ventricular assist devices using FSI to minimize thrombotic risk , 2014 .

[37]  M. McPeek,et al.  Modeling Three-Dimensional Morphological Structures Using Spherical Harmonics , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[38]  C. Lacor,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of turbomachinery using improved NSGA-II and approximation model , 2011 .

[39]  Harold Sun,et al.  Multi-Disciplinary Multi-Point Optimization of a Turbocharger Compressor Wheel , 2015 .

[40]  Martin Styner,et al.  Framework for the Statistical Shape Analysis of Brain Structures using SPHARM-PDM. , 2006, The insight journal.

[41]  O. Pironneau On optimum design in fluid mechanics , 1974 .

[42]  Nathanaël Schaeffer,et al.  Efficient spherical harmonic transforms aimed at pseudospectral numerical simulations , 2012, ArXiv.

[43]  Wei Shyy,et al.  Global Design Optimization for Aerodynamics and Rocket Propulsion Components , 2013 .

[44]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Parametrization of Closed Surfaces for 3-D Shape Description , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[45]  George Cybenko,et al.  Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function , 1992, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[46]  Zhenxu Sun,et al.  A modified multi-objective sorting particle swarm optimization and its application to the design of the nose shape of a high-speed train , 2015 .

[47]  Hassan Hemida Large-Eddy Simulation of the Flow around Simplified High-Speed Trains under Side Wind Conditions , thesis of Lic. of Engng, Division of Fluid Dynamics, Dept. of Applied Mechanics, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden, 2006. , 2006 .

[48]  Peter Schröder,et al.  Consistent mesh parameterizations , 2001, SIGGRAPH.

[49]  A. Jameson,et al.  Optimum Aerodynamic Design Using the Navier–Stokes Equations , 1997 .

[50]  Dong-Ho Lee,et al.  Multi-Objective Optimization of High-Speed Train Nose Shape Using the Vehicle Modeling Function , 2010 .

[51]  P. Marcus Description and Philosophy of Spectral Methods , 1986 .

[52]  Siuli Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Response surface methodology , 2010 .

[53]  Yong Peng,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of a high-speed train head based on the FFD method , 2016 .

[54]  G. Venter,et al.  An algorithm for fast optimal Latin hypercube design of experiments , 2010 .

[55]  R K Cooper,et al.  EFFECT OF CROSS-WINDS ON TRAINS , 1981 .

[56]  D. Gottlieb,et al.  Numerical analysis of spectral methods : theory and applications , 1977 .

[57]  Jean-François Beaudoin,et al.  Drag and lift reduction of a 3D bluff-body using active vortex generators , 2010 .