Surface-Level Diversity and Decision-Making in Groups: When Does Deep-Level Similarity Help?

We examined how surface-level diversity (based on race) and deep-level similarities influenced three-person decision-making groups on a hidden-profile task. Surface-level homogeneous groups perceived their information to be less unique and spent less time on the task than surface-level diverse groups. When the groups were given the opportunity to learn about their deep-level similarities prior to the task, group members felt more similar to one another and reported greater perceived attraction, but this was more true for surface-level homogeneous than surface-level diverse groups. Surface-level homogeneous groups performed slightly better after discovering deep-level similarities, but discovering deep-level similarities was not helpful for surface-level diverse groups, who otherwise outperformed surface-level homogeneous groups. We discuss the implications of this research for managing diversity in the workplace.

[1]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Information Pooling: When It Impacts Group Decision Making , 1998 .

[2]  Gwen M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Management of information in small groups. , 1996 .

[3]  M. Hogg,et al.  Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. , 1990, The British journal of social psychology.

[4]  David A. Wilder,et al.  Group Categorization and Attribution of Belief Similarity , 1979 .

[5]  J. Levine,et al.  Shared Cognition in-Organizations: The Management of Knowledge , 1999 .

[6]  G. Stasser,et al.  Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Kenji Hakuta,et al.  Effects of Racial Diversity on Complex Thinking in College Students , 2004, Psychological science.

[8]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Diagnosing groups: charting the flow of information in medical decision-making teams. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  Jonathan M. Bowman,et al.  A social validation explanation for mutual enhancement. , 2004 .

[10]  K. W. Phillips,et al.  The Effects of Categorically Based Expectations on Minority Influence: The Importance of Congruence , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[11]  Elizabeth A. McGlynn,et al.  Reducing intergroup conflict: From superordinate goals to decategorization, recategorization, and mutual differentiation. , 2000 .

[12]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  From Micro to Meso: Critical Steps in Conceptualizing and Conducting Multilevel Research , 2000 .

[13]  L. James.  Aggregation Bias in Estimates of Perceptual Agreement. , 1982 .

[14]  Michael J. Platow,et al.  Realizing the Diversity Dividend: Exploring the Subtle Interplay between Identity, Ideology, and Reality , 2003 .

[15]  Gwen M. Wittenbaum,et al.  The Bias Toward Discussing Shared Information , 2000, Commun. Res..

[16]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance , 1999 .

[17]  Audrey J. Murrell,et al.  Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. , 1989 .

[18]  K. W. Phillips,et al.  When surface and deep-level diversity collide: The effects on dissenting group members , 2006 .

[19]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Diverse groups and information sharing: The effects of congruent ties. , 2004 .

[20]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Searching for Common Threads: Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups , 1996 .

[21]  Garold Stasser,et al.  The uncertain role of unshared information in collective choice. , 1999 .

[22]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[23]  G. Stasser,et al.  Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. , 1987 .

[24]  D. Byrne.  The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[25]  Norman Miller,et al.  Assumed Similarity and Opinion Certainty , 1985 .

[26]  M. Diehl.  Social identity and minimal groups: The effects of interpersonal and intergroup attitudinal similarity on intergroup discrimination , 1988 .

[27]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  Gregory B. Northcraft,et al.  Three Social Dilemmas of Workforce Diversity in Organizations: A Social Identity Perspective , 1999 .

[29]  S. Jackson,et al.  7 UNDERSTANDING THE DYNAMICS OF DIVERSITY IN DECISION-MAKING TEAMS , 2004 .

[30]  T. Postmes,et al.  Quality of decision making and group norms. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  A. Van Hiel,et al.  Effects of Partially Shared Information and Awareness of Unshared Information on Information Sampling , 1996 .

[32]  D. A. Wilder,et al.  Empirical contributions: Predictions of belief homogeneity and similarity following social categorization , 1984 .

[33]  Warren E. Watson,et al.  Cultural diversity''s impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diver , 1993 .

[34]  J. R. Larson,et al.  The Impact of Experts on Information Sharing During Group Discussion , 2002 .

[35]  G. Northcraft,et al.  Double jeopardy : Resistance to affirmative action from potential beneficiaries , 1983 .

[36]  Jeffrey T. Polzer,et al.  Capitalizing on Diversity: Interpersonal Congruence in Small Work Groups , 2001 .

[37]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Diagnosing groups: the pooling, management, and impact of shared and unshared case information in team-based medical decision making. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Involvement as a derterminant of response to favorable and unfavorable information. , 1967 .

[39]  D. Harrison,et al.  Time, Teams, and Task Performance: Changing Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Group Functioning , 2002 .

[40]  M. Brewer,et al.  Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  Jolanda Jetten,et al.  The Individual Within the Group: Balancing the Need to Belong With the Need to Be Different , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[42]  David A. Thomas,et al.  Cultural Diversity at Work: The Effects of Diversity Perspectives on Work Group Processes and Outcomes , 2001 .

[43]  P. Bliese.  Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , 2000 .

[44]  I. Janis.  Victims Of Groupthink , 1972 .

[45]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2000 .

[46]  G. Stasser,et al.  Expert Roles and Information Exchange during Discussion: The Importance of Knowing Who Knows What , 1995 .

[47]  A. Hollingshead,et al.  From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm , 2004 .

[48]  Jeffrey T. Polzer,et al.  Should we create a niche or fall in line? Identity negotiation and small group effectiveness. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[49]  Jolanda Jetten,et al.  "We're all individuals": Group norms of individualism and collectivism, levels of identification, and identity threat , 2002 .

[50]  S. Fiske,et al.  Social Psychology , 2019, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[51]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Social influence in small groups: An interactive model of social identity formation , 2005 .

[52]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling Unshared Information: The Benefits of Knowing How Access to Information Is Distributed among Group Members , 2000 .

[53]  Katie A. Liljenquist,et al.  Exploring the rabbit hole of possibilities by myself or with my group: The benefits and liabilities of activating counterfactual mind‐sets for information sharing and group coordination , 2004 .

[54]  V. L. Allen,et al.  Categorization, belief similarity, and intergroup discrimination , 1975 .

[55]  S. Jackson,et al.  Recent Research on Team and Organizational Diversity: SWOT Analysis and Implications , 2003 .

[56]  D. Harrison,et al.  Beyond Relational Demography: Time and the Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion , 1998 .

[57]  G. Stasser,et al.  Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. , 1992 .

[58]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[59]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediation processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. , 1997 .

[60]  Aaron M. Brower,et al.  What's Social about Social Cognition?: Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups , 1996 .

[61]  James D. Westphal,et al.  How Experience and Network Ties Affect the Influence of Demographic Minorities on Corporate Boards , 2000 .

[62]  D. Kenrick,et al.  Repulsion or attraction? Group membership and assumed attitude similarity. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[63]  G. M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information , 1999 .

[64]  H. Tajfel.  Cognitive aspects of prejudice , 1969, Journal of Biosocial Science.

[65]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Group Composition and Decision Making: How Member Familiarity and Information Distribution Affect Process and Performance , 1996 .