Motor planning and execution in left- and right-handed individuals during a bimanual grasping and placing task.

The issue of handedness has been the topic of great interest for researchers in a number of scientific domains. It is typically observed that the dominant hand yields numerous behavioral advantages over the non-dominant hand during unimanual tasks, which provides evidence of hemispheric specialization. In contrast to advantages for the dominant hand during motor execution, recent research has demonstrated that the right hand has advantages during motor planning (regardless of handedness), indicating that motor planning is a specialized function of the left hemisphere. In the present study we explored hemispheric advantages in motor planning and execution in left- and right-handed individuals during a bimanual grasping and placing task. Replicating previous findings, both motor planning and execution was influenced by object end-orientation congruency. In addition, although motor planning (i.e., end-state comfort) was not influenced by hand or handedness, motor execution differed between left and right hand, with shorter object transport times observed for the left hand, regardless of handedness. These results demonstrate that the hemispheric advantages often observed in unimanual tasks do not extend to discrete bimanual tasks. We propose that the differences in object transport time between the two hands arise from overt shifting visual fixation between the two hands/objects.

[1]  Provins Ka.  Handedness and motor skill. , 1967 .

[2]  Frank Marchak,et al.  Constraints for Action Selection: Overhand Versus Underhand Grips , 2018, Attention and Performance XIII.

[3]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[4]  Daniel Cattaert,et al.  Hand coordination in bimanual circle drawing. , 1995 .

[5]  D Elliott,et al.  Lateral asymmetries in finger-tapping by adolescents and young adults with Down syndrome. , 1986, American journal of mental deficiency.

[6]  S. Jackson,et al.  Attention for action: coordinating bimanual reach-to-grasp movements. , 1999, British journal of psychology.

[7]  D Goodman,et al.  On the nature of human interlimb coordination. , 1979, Science.

[8]  Martin V. Sale,et al.  Asymmetry of motor cortex excitability during a simple motor task: relationships with handedness and manual performance , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  Geoffrey P. Bingham,et al.  The coordination patterns observed when two hands reach-to-grasp separate objects , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  S. Riek,et al.  Bimanual aiming and overt attention: one law for two hands , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  K. Flowers,et al.  Handedness and controlled movement. , 1975, British journal of psychology.

[12]  G. Binsted,et al.  Cross-education of arm muscular strength is unidirectional in right-handed individuals. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[13]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Planning macroscopic aspects of manual control , 1992 .

[14]  R. Ivry,et al.  Bimanual cross-talk during reaching movements is primarily related to response selection, not the specification of motor parameters , 2003, Psychological research.

[15]  Elizabeth A Franz,et al.  Does Handedness Determine Which Hand Leads in a Bimanual Task? , 2002, Journal of motor behavior.

[16]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Dissociation of Spatial and Temporal Coupling in the Bimanual Movements of Callosotomy Patients , 1996 .

[17]  Tristan T. Nakagawa,et al.  Bimanual movement control is moderated by fixation strategies , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  M. Dragovic,et al.  Categorization and validation of handedness using latent class analysis , 2004, Acta Neuropsychiatrica.

[19]  Robert Sessions Woodworth,et al.  THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT , 1899 .

[20]  Ruud G. J. Meulenbroek,et al.  Behavioral evidence for left-hemisphere specialization of motor planning , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  E. Franz,et al.  Goal-related planning constraints in bimanual grasping and placing of objects , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  Matthew Heath,et al.  Manual asymmetries in bimanual reaching: The influence of spatial compatibility and visuospatial attention , 2005, Brain and Cognition.

[23]  L. Ehrman,et al.  On the Other Hand , 2005, Behavior genetics.

[24]  Matthias Weigelt,et al.  Motor planning in bimanual object manipulation: two plans for two hands? , 2010, Motor control.

[25]  J I Todor,et al.  Accommodation to increased accuracy demands by the right and left hands. , 1985, Journal of motor behavior.

[26]  R. Sainburg.  Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  H. Honda,et al.  Rightward Superiority of Eye Movements in a Bimanual Aiming Task , 1982, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[28]  E A Franz,et al.  Spatial Coupling in the Coordination of Complex Actions , 1997, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[29]  R. Cohen,et al.  Plans for grasping objects , 2006 .

[30]  V. Nougier,et al.  Manual Asymmetries in Reaching Movement Control. I: Study of Right-Handers , 2001, Cortex.

[31]  M. Peters,et al.  Prolonged Practice of a Simple Motor Task by Preferred and Nonpreferred Hands , 1976, Perceptual and motor skills.

[32]  L. Cooper.  Demonstration of a mental analog of an external rotation , 1976 .

[33]  G. Fullerton.  Psychology and physiology. , 1896 .

[34]  J. Annett,et al.  The Control of Movement in the Preferred and Non-Preferred Hands* , 1979, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[35]  R. Sainburg,et al.  Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  H. Carnahan.  Manual Asymmetries in Response to Rapid Target Movement , 1998, Brain and Cognition.

[37]  W. Prinz,et al.  End-state comfort in bimanual object manipulation. , 2006, Experimental psychology.

[38]  B. Martin,et al.  Eye–hand coordination of symmetric bimanual reaching tasks: temporal aspects , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  R. Shepard,et al.  The time required to prepare for a rotated stimulus , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[40]  George Grouios,et al.  Right hand advantage in visually guided reaching and aiming movements: brief review and comments , 2006, Ergonomics.

[41]  David F Stodden,et al.  The End-State Comfort Effect in Bimanual Grip Selection , 2003, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[42]  B. Steenbergen,et al.  Combined effects of planning and execution constraints on bimanual task performance , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  Bimanual grasp planning reflects changing rather than fixed constraint dominance , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  M. Peters,et al.  Neuropsychological identification of motor problems: Can we learn something from the feet and legs that hands and arms will not tell us? , 1990, Neuropsychology Review.

[45]  H N Zelaznik,et al.  Spatial topological constraints in a bimanual task. , 1991, Acta psychologica.

[46]  Charmayne M. L. Hughes,et al.  Physically coupling two objects in a bimanual task alters kinematics but not end-state comfort , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[47]  L. Cooper.  Mental rotation of random two-dimensional shapes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[48]  K. Peacock,et al.  Functional coupling between the limbs during bimanual reach-to-grasp movements. , 2002, Human movement science.

[49]  J I Todor,et al.  Hand differences in the rate and variability of rapid tapping. , 1980, Journal of motor behavior.

[50]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Attention and Handedness in Bimanual Coordination Dynamics , 1997 .

[51]  C. W. Koutstaal,et al.  Latency of Verbal Reproductions as a Variable in Vocal Paired-Associate Learning , 1976 .

[52]  H Heuer,et al.  Structural constraints on bimanual movements , 1993, Psychological research.

[53]  Andrea H Mason,et al.  Manual asymmetries in bimanual prehension tasks: manipulation of object size and object distance. , 2009, Human movement science.

[54]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Images and Their Transformations , 1982 .