Sowing the seeds of IS cultivation in public service organisations

This paper aims to highlight the relevance of a cultivation approach with the goal of exploring the concrete implications it may have for public administrations (PA) involved in projects of organisational change. We suggest that adopting an approach to change that reflects the cultivation perspective is an unavoidable choice for PA, much more so than it is for the corporate world. The claim is that public-sector organisations design and implement organisational solutions that find it hard to move away from the ‘maintenance’ logic of legacy systems. Compared with the rational perspective, which is geared entirely to establishing optimal relations between means and ends, the cultivation approach enables us to make valuable advances at the interpretive level. We argue that the value of the processual and incremental perspective can be useful in creating a more realistic and less illusory reconstruction of the relationship between technological change and organisational change. In this paper, we discuss how combining policy studies with ICT social studies can help empower the cultivation logic, originating new tools for analysing and evaluating e-government results.

[1]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Using Computers in Qualitative Research , 1991 .

[2]  David Landsbergen,et al.  Realizing the Promise: Government Information Systems and the Fourth Generation of Information Technology , 2001 .

[3]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[4]  Roland Traunmüller,et al.  e-Government at a Decisive Moment: Sketching a Roadmap to Excellence , 2003, EGOV.

[5]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  Organizational engineering in public administrations: a method for process-oriented egovernment projects , 2004, SAC '04.

[6]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  De profundis? Deconstructing the concept of strategic alignment , 1997, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Lisa K. Westerback.  Toward best practices for strategic information technology management , 2000, Gov. Inf. Q..

[8]  Kim Viborg Andersen,et al.  E-government and Public Sector Process Rebuilding: Dilettantes, Wheel Barrows, and Diamonds , 2006 .

[9]  C. Lindblom.  THE SCIENCE OF MUDDLING THROUGH , 1959 .

[10]  Kenneth J. Arrow,et al.  A Strategy of Decision, Policy Evaluation as a Social Process. , 1964 .

[11]  Jens Bergqvist,et al.  Scalability through Cultivation. Designing IT Support for Co-ordination Work , 1998 .

[12]  Elisabeth Davenport,et al.  A Social Shaping Perspective on an e-Governmental System(ic) Failure , 2004, EGOV.

[13]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[14]  A. Cordella,et al.  Information infrastructure in action , 2006 .

[15]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  Digital Technologies and the Duality of Risk , 2004 .

[16]  Michael J. Ginzberg.  Improving MIS project selection , 1979 .

[17]  R. Bovbjerg.  What is policy analysis , 1985 .

[18]  Caroline J. Tolbert,et al.  Innovating in Digital Government in the American States , 2003 .

[19]  David Braybrooke,et al.  A Strategy of Decision: Policy Evaluation As a Social Process. , 1964 .

[20]  O. Hanseth,et al.  From tool to Gestell: agendas for managing the information infrastructure , 1998 .

[21]  Maddalena Sorrentino,et al.  The Implementation Of ICT In Public Sector Organisations. Analysing Selection Criteria For eGovernment Projects , 2004, Bled eConference.

[22]  Deidra L. Fryer,et al.  The Social Study of Information and Communication Technology: Innovation, Actors and Contexts , 2005 .

[23]  Niki Lambropoulos,et al.  "The Model as an Equilibristic Grid of Interrelations" (A critical view upon "The improvisational model of change management: the case of groupware technologies" by Wanda Orlikowski and J. Debra Hofman) , 2001 .

[24]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  The significance of context in information systems and organizational change , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[25]  Winston Tellis,et al.  Introduction to Case Study , 1997 .

[26]  E. Ferlie,et al.  Process Transformation: Limitations to Radical Organizational Change within Public Service Organizations , 2004 .

[27]  James G. March,et al.  Organizing Political Life: What Administrative Reorganization Tells Us about Government , 1983, American Political Science Review.

[28]  Tony Cornford,et al.  ICT, Innovation and Public Management: Governance, Models & Alternatives for E-Government Infrastructures , 2005, ECIS.

[29]  Mateja Kunstelj,et al.  Evaluating the progress of e-government development: A critical analysis , 2004, Inf. Polity.

[30]  A. Bentley,et al.  The Process of Government; A Study of Social Pressures , 2010 .

[31]  Gloria Regonini.  Capire le politiche pubbliche , 2001 .

[32]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  An Improvisational Model of Change Management: The Case of Groupware Technologies , 1996 .

[33]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Rituals in Information System Design , 1984, MIS Q..

[34]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  Crisis and foundations: an inquiry into the nature and limits of models and methods in the information systems discipline , 1998, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[35]  C. Lindblom.  Inquiry and Change: The Troubled Attempt to Understand and Shape Society , 1992 .

[36]  Richard Heeks.  e-Government as a Carrier of Context , 2005, Journal of Public Policy.

[37]  L. Willcocks.  Managing information systems in UK public administration: Issues and prospects , 1994 .

[38]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  Developing Information Infrastructure: The Tension Between Standardization and Flexibility , 1996 .

[39]  Klaus Lenk.  Electronic Service Delivery - A driver of public sector modernisation , 2002, Inf. Polity.

[40]  Francesco Virili,et al.  Socio-technical Perspectives on e-Government Initiatives , 2003, EGOV.

[41]  Ignacio J. Martinez-Moyano,et al.  Exploring E-Government Evolution: The Influence of Systems of Rules on Organizational Action , 2005 .

[42]  R. McIvor,et al.  The Potential of Internet Technologies: Insights from the Public Sector , 2004 .

[43]  Christine Bellamy,et al.  New information and communications technologies and institutional change , 1996 .

[44]  Rob Kling,et al.  IT and organizational change in digital economies: a socio-technical approach , 1999, CSOC.

[45]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Theorizing about the Design of Information Infrastructures: Design Kernel Theories and Principles , 2008 .

[46]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  The labyrinths of Information , 2002 .

[47]  Zahir Irani,et al.  IS Evaluation in the UK Public Sector: Emerging Research Themes and Issues , 2003, AMCIS.