Experimental Assessment of Gradual Deformation Method

Uncertainty in future reservoir performance is usually evaluated from the simulated performance of a small number of reservoir realizations. Unfortunately, most of the practical methods for generating realizations conditional to production data are only approximately correct. It is not known whether or not the recently developed method of Gradual Deformation is an approximate method or if it actually generates realizations that are distributed correctly. In this paper, we evaluate the ability of the Gradual Deformation method to correctly assess the uncertainty in reservoir predictions by comparing the distribution of conditional realizations for a small test problem with the standard distribution from a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method, which is known to be correct, and with distributions from several approximate methods. Although the Gradual Deformation algorithm samples inefficiently for this test problem and is clearly not an exact method, it gives similar uncertainty estimates to those obtained by MCMC method based on a relatively small number of realizations.

[1]  Henning Omre,et al.  Uncertainty in Production Forecasts based on Well Observations, Seismic Data and Production History , 2001 .

[2]  Benoît Nœtinger,et al.  Stochastic Reservoir Modeling Constrained to Dynamic Data: Local Calibration and Inference of Structural Parameters , 2001 .

[3]  L. Hu Gradual Deformation and Iterative Calibration of Gaussian-Related Stochastic Models , 2000 .

[4]  Dean S. Oliver,et al.  A Hybrid Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method for Generating Permeability Fields Conditioned to Multiwell Pressure Data and Prior Information , 1998 .

[5]  Dean S. Oliver,et al.  Evaluation of Monte Carlo Methods for Assessing Uncertainty , 2003 .

[6]  Dean S. Oliver,et al.  Conditioning Permeability Fields to Pressure Data , 1996 .

[7]  L. Hu,et al.  Gradual Deformation of Continuous Geostatistical Models for History Matching , 1998 .

[8]  L. Hu,et al.  Gradual deformation and iterative calibration of truncated Gaussian simulations , 2001, Petroleum Geoscience.

[9]  Lin Hu,et al.  Stochastic Reservoir Modeling Constrained to Dynamic Data: Local Calibration and Inference of the Structural Parameters , 1999 .

[10]  D. Oliver,et al.  Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for conditioning a permeability field to pressure data , 1997 .

[11]  Benoît Nœtinger,et al.  Optimization with the Gradual Deformation Method , 2002 .

[12]  F. Roggero,et al.  Reducing Uncertainties in Production Forecasts by Constraining Geological Modeling to Dynamic Data , 1999 .