Is the effect of job strain on myocardial infarction risk due to interaction between high psychological demands and low decision latitude? Results from Stockholm Heart Epidemiology Program (SHEEP).

The objectives are to examine if the excess risk of myocardial infarction from exposure to job strain is due to interaction between high demands and low control and to analyse what role such an interaction has regarding socioeconomic differences in risk of myocardial infarction. The material is a population-based case-referent study having incident first events of myocardial infarction as outcome (SHEEP: Stockholm Heart Epidemiology Program). The analysis is restricted to males 45-64 yr of age with a more detailed analysis confined to those still working at inclusion. In total, 1047 cases and 1450 referents were included in the analysis. Exposure categories of job strain were formed from self reported questionnaire information. The results show that high demands and low decision latitude interact with a synergy index of 7.5 (95% C.I.: 1.8-30.6) providing empirical support for the core mechanism of the job strain model. Manual workers are more susceptible when exposed to job strain and its components and this increased susceptibility explains about 25-50% of the relative excess risk among manual workers. Low decision latitude may also, as a causal link, explain about 30% of the socioeconomic difference in risk of myocardial infarction. The distinction between the interaction and the causal link mechanisms identifies new etiologic questions and intervention alternatives. The specific causes of the increased susceptibility among manual workers to job strain and its components seem to be an interesting and important research question.

[1]  P. Landsbergis,et al.  Job strain and cardiovascular disease. , 1994, Annual review of public health.

[2]  A. LaCroix,et al.  Occupational strain and the incidence of coronary heart disease. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[3]  M. Marmot,et al.  Contribution of job control and other risk factors to social variations in coronary heart disease incidence , 1997, The Lancet.

[4]  Robert Karasek,et al.  Current issues relating to psychosocial job strain and cardiovascular disease research. , 1998, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[5]  H. Morgenstern,et al.  Epidemiologic Research: Principles and Quantitative Methods. , 1983 .

[6]  J. Johnson,et al.  Long-term psychosocial work environment and cardiovascular mortality among Swedish men. , 1996, American journal of public health.

[7]  A. Ahlbom,et al.  How to evaluate interaction between causes: a review of practices in cardiovascular epidemiology , 1996, Journal of internal medicine.

[8]  T Akerstedt,et al.  Changes in job strain in relation to changes in physiological state. A longitudinal study. , 1988, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[9]  T. Kristensen The demand-control-support model: Methodological challenges for future research. , 1995 .

[10]  J. Salonen,et al.  Do cardiovascular risk factors explain the relation between socioeconomic status, risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and acute myocardial infarction? , 1996, American journal of epidemiology.

[11]  S. Kasl The influence of the work environment on cardiovascular health: a historical, conceptual, and methodological perspective. , 1996, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[12]  Robert Karasek,et al.  Job decision latitude and mental strain: Implications for job redesign , 1979 .

[13]  S Lemeshow,et al.  Confidence interval estimation of interaction. , 1992, Epidemiology.

[14]  A Tsutsumi,et al.  Decision latitude, job strain, and myocardial infarction: a study of working men in Stockholm. The SHEEP Study Group. Stockholm Heart epidemiology Program. , 1998, American journal of public health.

[15]  F. Diderichsen,et al.  A SAS program calculating three measures of interaction with confidence intervals. , 1996, Epidemiology.

[16]  Robert Karasek,et al.  Healthy Work : Stress, Productivity, and the Reconstruction of Working Life , 1990 .

[17]  J. Johnson,et al.  Job strain, work place social support, and cardiovascular disease: a cross-sectional study of a random sample of the Swedish working population. , 1988, American journal of public health.

[18]  A Ahlbom,et al.  Job decision latitude, job demands, and cardiovascular disease: a prospective study of Swedish men. , 1981, American journal of public health.

[19]  A. LaCroix,et al.  The relation of psychosocial dimensions of work with coronary heart disease risk factors: a meta-analysis of five United States data bases. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[20]  L Alfredsson,et al.  Job characteristics of occupations and myocardial infarction risk:effect of possible confounding factors. , 1983, Social science & medicine.

[21]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Job characteristics in relation to the prevalence of myocardial infarction in the US Health Examination Survey (HES) and the Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (HANES). , 1988, American journal of public health.