Green knowledge management and organizational green culture: an interaction for organizational green innovation and green performance

Purpose Based on the sharp decline in the quantity and quality of natural resources, many organizations are shifting their operations to an eco-friendly system. However, this objective cannot be achieved without capitalizing on green knowledge and innovation. The purpose of this study is to examine whether green knowledge management (GKM) strengthens organizational green innovation capabilities, leading to green performance. Moreover, considering culture as the buffering condition, the authors took it as the conditional boundary between GKM and green innovation and investigated if it impacts their relationship. Design/methodology/approach The authors focused on the manufacturing and services firms’ managerial and non-managerial staff and collected data following the non-probability convenience sampling technique. The collected data were examined through structural equation modeling. Findings It is found that GKM is a significant positive predictor of organizational green innovation and green performance and strengthens their abilities in these areas. However, green innovation partially mediates between GKM and corporate green performance. It is also found that green culture strengthens the relationship between GKM and organizational green innovation. Originality/value This study’s findings provide confidence to organizational managers and related stakeholders to achieve sustainability goals by capitalizing on GKM and promoting green culture in their setup. This study is also among the pioneer studies investigating GKM as a unified system and linking it with environmental performance domains.

[1]  Muhammad Asif Khan,et al.  Knowledge creation dynamics of technological forecasting and social change special issues , 2022, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[2]  K. Ng Effects of organizational culture, affective commitment and trust on knowledge-sharing tendency , 2022, J. Knowl. Manag..

[3]  Yaw Agyabeng-Mensah,et al.  How does supply chain knowledge enhance green innovation? The mediation mechanisms of corporate reputation and non-supply chain learning , 2022, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing.

[4]  D. Teece,et al.  Value Impedance and Dynamic Capabilities: The Case of MedTech Incumbent-Born Digital Healthcare Platforms , 2022, California Management Review.

[5]  J. Abbas,et al.  Interplay between corporate social responsibility and organizational green culture and their role in employees’ responsible behavior towards the environment and society , 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[6]  Vaneet Kaur Knowledge-based dynamic capabilities: a scientometric analysis of marriage between knowledge management and dynamic capabilities , 2022, J. Knowl. Manag..

[7]  K. Fernandes,et al.  Contextualising the role of external partnerships to innovate the core and enabling processes of an organisation: A resource and knowledge-based view , 2022, Journal of Business Research.

[8]  Shoaib Ali,et al.  Is Intellectual Property Beneficial to Knowledge Management? Literature Review on Organizational Knowledge Protection , 2022, Journal of the Knowledge Economy.

[9]  Rodolfo Martínez-Gutiérrez,et al.  Knowledge Complexity and Collective Intelligence Development in Technology Based-Firms , 2022, 2022 IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON EUROPE).

[10]  Manaf Al-Okaily,et al.  The effect of digital accounting systems on the decision-making quality in the banking industry sector: a mediated-moderated model , 2022, Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication.

[11]  Siddhartha Paul Tiwari Emerging Technologies: Factors Influencing Knowledge Sharing , 2022, World Journal of Educational Research.

[12]  Xinyu Gao,et al.  Can the establishment of eco-industrial parks promote urban green innovation? Evidence from China , 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[13]  K. Hussainey,et al.  Corporate transformation toward Industry 4.0 and financial performance: The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) , 2022, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[14]  Divesh Ojha,et al.  Managing information for innovation using knowledge integration capability: The role of boundary spanning objects , 2022, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[15]  S. Nupap Knowledge Management System by applying Knowledge Creating Company: Transforming Tacit to Explicit Knowledge , 2022, 2022 Joint International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology with ECTI Northern Section Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Computer and Telecommunications Engineering (ECTI DAMT & NCON).

[16]  Manaf Al-Okaily,et al.  The impact of green lending on credit risk: evidence from UAE’s banks , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[17]  Herman A. van den Berg,et al.  Individual knowledge measurement: organizational knowledge measured at the individual level , 2021, J. Knowl. Manag..

[18]  J. Abbas,et al.  Sustainable Supply Chain and Business Performance: The Impact of Strategy, Network Design, Information Systems, and Organizational Structure , 2022 .

[19]  S. Kozhakhmet,et al.  Knowledge acquisition of Chinese expatriates: managing Chinese MNEs in Kazakhstan , 2022, Journal of International Management.

[20]  Shaoying Zhu,et al.  How Environmental Knowledge and Green Values Affect the Relationship between Green Human Resource Management and Employees’ Green Behavior: From the Perspective of Emission Reduction , 2021, Processes.

[21]  J. Abbas,et al.  Examining the Role of Motivation and Reward in Employees’ Job Performance through Mediating Effect of Job Satisfaction: An Empirical Evidence , 2021, International Journal of Organizational Leadership.

[22]  Abdelmohsen A. Nassani,et al.  Impact of Knowledge Sharing on Sustainable Performance: Mediating Role of Employee’s Ambidexterity , 2021, Sustainability.

[23]  G. A. Dávila,et al.  Quality Management, Knowledge Creation, and Innovation Performance: Insights from Ecuador , 2021, Latin American Business Review.

[24]  H. Gelaidan,et al.  The joint impact of green human resource management, leadership and organizational culture on employees’ green behaviour and organisational environmental performance , 2021 .

[25]  Abaid Ullah Zafar,et al.  Does the interaction between the knowledge management process and sustainable development practices boost corporate green innovation? , 2021, Business Strategy and the Environment.

[26]  M. Uysal,et al.  Leadership, green innovation, and green creativity: a systematic review , 2021, The Service Industries Journal.

[27]  J. Abbas,et al.  Examining the relationship between total quality management and knowledge management and their impact on organizational performance: a dimensional analysis , 2021, Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences.

[28]  Yishuai Yin,et al.  Knowledge spillover, knowledge management capabilities, and innovation among returnee entrepreneurial firms in emerging markets: Does entrepreneurial ecosystem matter? , 2021 .

[29]  Eswara Krishna Mussada,et al.  Analysing the relationship of adaption of green culture, innovation, green performance for achieving sustainability: Mediating role of employee commitment , 2021 .

[30]  S. Raza,et al.  Do green HR practices enhance green motivation and proactive environmental management maturity in hotel industry? , 2021 .

[31]  Abaid Ullah Zafar,et al.  Green core competencies to prompt green absorptive capacity and bolster green innovation: the moderating role of organization’s green culture , 2021, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management.

[32]  J. Amankwah‐Amoah,et al.  The effects of knowledge integration and contextual ambidexterity on innovation in entrepreneurial ventures , 2021 .

[33]  Y. Tu,et al.  How does green innovation improve enterprises’ competitive advantage? The role of organizational learning , 2021 .

[34]  Antonio Ariza-Montes,et al.  A Scientometric Systematic Review of Entrepreneurial Wellbeing Knowledge Production , 2021, Frontiers in Psychology.

[35]  P. Muisyo,et al.  Enhancing the FIRM’S green performance through green HRM: The moderating role of green innovation culture , 2021 .

[36]  Hadi Prabowo,et al.  The Impact of Workplace Green Behavior and Green Innovation on Green Performance of SMEs: A Case Study in Indonesia , 2021 .

[37]  M. Vittuari,et al.  Food waste reduction in supply chains through innovations: a review , 2020, Measuring Business Excellence.

[38]  Syed Asim Shah,et al.  Analyzing the relationship between green innovation and environmental performance in large manufacturing firms , 2020, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[39]  S. Kraus,et al.  Corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: The mediating role of environmental strategy and green innovation , 2020, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[40]  J. Abbas,et al.  Examining the Causes of Plastic Bags Usages and Public Perception about its Effects on the Natural Environment , 2020 .

[41]  Mohsin Shahzad,et al.  Exploring the influence of knowledge management process on corporate sustainable performance through green innovation , 2020, J. Knowl. Manag..

[42]  Muhammad Ashfaq,et al.  How “Green” thinking and altruism translate into purchasing intentions for electronics products: The intrinsic-extrinsic motivation mechanism , 2020 .

[43]  Khawaja Fawad Latif,et al.  Refuelling knowledge management processes towards organisational performance: mediating role of creative organisational learning , 2020, Knowledge Management Research & Practice.

[44]  Z. Zhang,et al.  Green knowledge management and strategic renewal: a discursive perspective on corporate sustainability , 2020 .

[45]  Zhongju Liao,et al.  The effect of environmental policy tools on regional green innovation: Evidence from China , 2020 .

[46]  Anwar Khan,et al.  Innovation, foreign direct investment (FDI), and the energy–pollution–growth nexus in OECD region: a simultaneous equation modeling approach , 2020, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[47]  Yajiong Xue,et al.  Green learning orientation, green knowledge acquisition and ambidextrous green innovation , 2020 .

[48]  Md. Aftab Uddin,et al.  The Influence of Knowledge Sharing on Sustainable Performance: A Moderated Mediation Study , 2020 .

[49]  J. Abbas Impact of total quality management on corporate sustainability through the mediating effect of knowledge management , 2020 .

[50]  Moxi Song,et al.  Green Knowledge Sharing, Stakeholder Pressure, Absorptive Capacity, and Green Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Firms , 2020 .

[51]  B. Roy,et al.  Organizational Culture, Practices, and Patterns of Interaction that Drive the Gender Pay Gap in Medicine: Second-Generation Gender Bias and Other Complexities , 2020 .

[52]  J. Abbas Impact of total quality management on corporate green performance through the mediating role of corporate social responsibility , 2020 .

[53]  Lucía Muñoz-Pascual,et al.  Human Resource Management Contributions to Knowledge Sharing for a Sustainability-Oriented Performance: A Mixed Methods Approach , 2019, Sustainability.

[54]  J. Abbas,et al.  Impact of knowledge management practices on green innovation and corporate sustainable development: A structural analysis , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[55]  Robert E. Hooker,et al.  The mediating effect of green innovation on the relationship between green supply chain management and environmental performance , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[56]  J. Cheah,et al.  Does firm size matter? Evidence on the impact of the green innovation strategy on corporate financial performance in the automotive sector , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[57]  Xuemei Xie,et al.  Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: A content analysis method , 2019, Journal of Business Research.

[58]  Chao-Hung Wang,et al.  How organizational green culture influences green performance and competitive advantage , 2019, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management.

[59]  M. Aboelmaged,et al.  Absorptive capacity and green innovation adoption in SMEs: The mediating effects of sustainable organisational capabilities , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[60]  H. I. Hussain,et al.  Industry 4.0: A Solution towards Technology Challenges of Sustainable Business Performance , 2019, Social Sciences.

[61]  Qiang Ji,et al.  How much does financial development contribute to renewable energy growth and upgrading of energy structure in China? , 2019, Energy Policy.

[62]  A. Kraslawski,et al.  Creativity enables sustainable development: Supplier engagement as a boundary condition for the positive effect on green innovation , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[63]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Reshoring and environmental sustainability: An unexplored relationship? , 2019, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[64]  Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour,et al.  Pursuing green growth in technology firms through the connections between environmental innovation and sustainable business performance: Does service capability matter? , 2019, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[65]  A. Zbuchea,et al.  Sustainable Knowledge Management and Its Impact on the Performances of Biotechnology Organizations , 2019, Sustainability.

[66]  Yuan Jiang,et al.  Openness to Experience and Team Creativity: Effects of Knowledge Sharing and Transformational Leadership , 2019, Creativity Research Journal.

[67]  Joberto S. B. Martins,et al.  Strategic knowledge management in a digital environment: Tacit and explicit knowledge in Fab Labs , 2018, Journal of Business Research.

[68]  Yu‐Shan Chen,et al.  Improving green product development performance from green vision and organizational culture perspectives , 2019, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.

[69]  Dirk Basten,et al.  Approaches for Organizational Learning: A Literature Review , 2018 .

[70]  M. Tuna,et al.  Reinforcing competitive advantage through green organizational culture and green innovation , 2018 .

[71]  Sajjad M. Jasimuddin,et al.  Knowledge-oriented leadership and open innovation: Role of knowledge management capability in France-based multinationals , 2018, International Business Review.

[72]  Kuan Yew Wong,et al.  Development and validation of knowledge management performance measurement constructs for small and medium enterprises , 2015, J. Knowl. Manag..

[73]  Ab Wahab Emilia Knowledge Management Enablers and Knowledge Management Processes , 2015 .

[74]  Herman A. van den Berg,et al.  Three shapes of organisational knowledge , 2013, J. Knowl. Manag..

[75]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[76]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The knowledge-creating company , 2008 .

[77]  Francisco Javier Lloréns Montes,et al.  Relationship between quality management practices and knowledge transfer , 2007 .

[78]  C. Lance,et al.  The Sources of Four Commonly Reported Cutoff Criteria , 2006 .

[79]  J. Russell,et al.  United Nations Global Compact , 2012 .

[80]  Roger Bennett,et al.  Organisational factors and knowledge management within large marketing departments: an empirical study , 1999, J. Knowl. Manag..

[81]  Timothy R. Hinkin A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires , 1998 .

[82]  P. Bentler,et al.  Fit indices in covariance structure modeling : Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification , 1998 .

[83]  D. Hendy The green theory , 1996 .

[84]  T. Davenport Saving IT's Soul: Human-Centered Information Management. , 1994 .

[85]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[86]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[87]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[88]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[89]  Gilbert A. Churchill A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[90]  H. Kaiser,et al.  Little Jiffy, Mark Iv , 1974 .

[91]  S. Hart,et al.  A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1995 .