Damage detection in nonlinear vibrating structures using model updating

This paper presents two distinct model updating strategies for dynamical systems with local nonlinearities based on acceleration time history responses measured spatially across the vibrating structure. Both linear and nonlinear parameters are calibrated by minimizing the selected metric based on measured and predicted response using the newly proposed variant of differential search algorithm named as multi-cluster hybrid adaptive differential search (MCHADS) algorithm. The first model updating strategy involves the decoupling of linear and nonlinear characteristics of the system. In this scheme, we first establish the dynamic stiffness matrix using input and output measurements and then the underlying linear system is alone updated using it. Later, localization of the nonlinear attachment is attempted using the inverse property of the FRF of the nonlinear system and the established dynamic stiffness matrix of the underlying linear system from the previous step. Once the linear system is updated and with the already identified location(s) of nonlinear attachment(s), the nonlinear parameters are identified by formulating it as an optimization problem using the proposed MCHADS algorithm. The major advantage of the first approach is the reduction of the complex problem of nonlinear model updating to linear model updating. The second approach involves updating both linear and nonlinear parameters simultaneously using the proposed MCHADS algorithm. Investigations have been carried out by solving several numerically simulated examples and also with the experimental data of a benchmark problem to evaluate the effectiveness of the two proposed nonlinear model updating strategies. Further, investigations are also carried out to evaluate the capability of the model updating approaches towards damage identification in initially healthy nonlinear systems. Conclusions are drawn based on these investigations, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of the two model updating approaches

[1]  Seung-Seop Jin,et al.  Model updating based on mixed-integer nonlinear programming under model-form uncertainty in finite element model , 2020, Engineering with Computers.

[2]  A. Rao,et al.  Optimal design of laminate composite plates using dynamic hybrid adaptive harmony search algorithm , 2015 .

[3]  Wadee Alhalabi,et al.  Performance analysis: Differential search algorithm based on randomization and benchmark functions , 2019, Data Technol. Appl..

[4]  Reinhard Schmidt Updating non-linear components , 1994 .

[5]  K. Worden,et al.  Past, present and future of nonlinear system identification in structural dynamics , 2006 .

[6]  Ramin Ghiasi,et al.  A three-stage damage detection method for large-scale space structures using forward substructuring approach and enhanced bat optimization algorithm , 2018, Engineering with Computers.

[7]  Alexander F. Vakakis,et al.  Methodology for nonlinear quantification of a flexible beam with a local, strong nonlinearity , 2017 .

[8]  A. Rama Mohan Rao,et al.  Parallel mesh-partitioning algorithms for generating shape optimised partitions using evolutionary computing , 2009, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[9]  Mehmet Kurt,et al.  Methodology for model updating of mechanical components with local nonlinearities , 2015 .

[10]  A. Rama Mohan Rao,et al.  A scatter search algorithm for stacking sequence optimisation of laminate composites , 2005 .

[11]  Pauziah Muhamad,et al.  On the orthogonalised reverse path method for nonlinear system identification , 2012 .

[12]  K. Lakshmi,et al.  Detection of delamination in laminated composites with limited measurements combining PCA and dynamic QPSO , 2015, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[13]  Gaëtan Kerschen,et al.  Identification of a continuous structure with a geometrical non-linearity. Part I: Conditioned reverse path method , 2003 .

[14]  Michael Link,et al.  Modelling and updating of local non-linearities using frequency response residuals , 2003 .

[15]  Rongming Lin,et al.  Model updating of damped structures using FRF data , 2006 .

[16]  Bo Liu Composite Differential Search Algorithm , 2014, J. Appl. Math..

[17]  Pinar Civicioglu,et al.  Transforming geocentric cartesian coordinates to geodetic coordinates by using differential search algorithm , 2012, Comput. Geosci..

[18]  Xiangyu Wang,et al.  A novel differential search algorithm and applications for structure design , 2015, Appl. Math. Comput..

[19]  J. F. Schultz,et al.  STATISTICAL BASED NON-LINEAR MODEL UPDATING USING FEATURE EXTRACTION , 2000 .

[20]  V. Jayalakshmi,et al.  Simultaneous identification of damage and input dynamic force on the structure for structural health monitoring , 2017 .

[21]  Elena Niculina Dragoi,et al.  Influence of randomization strategies and problem characteristics on the performance of Differential Search algorithm , 2017, Appl. Soft Comput..

[22]  Fabrício Alves de Almeida,et al.  Inverse structural damage identification problem in CFRP laminated plates using SFO algorithm based on strain fields , 2020, Engineering with Computers.

[23]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Numerical methods for computing angles between linear subspaces , 1971, Milestones in Matrix Computation.

[24]  Hossein Nezamabadi-pour,et al.  GSA: A Gravitational Search Algorithm , 2009, Inf. Sci..

[25]  C. T. Kelley,et al.  Detection and Remediation of Stagnation in the Nelder--Mead Algorithm Using a Sufficient Decrease Condition , 1999, SIAM J. Optim..

[26]  Wei-Xin Ren,et al.  Nonlinear structural model updating based on instantaneous frequencies and amplitudes of the decomposed dynamic responses , 2015 .

[27]  A. Rama Mohan Rao,et al.  Optimal placement of sensors for structural system identification and health monitoring using a hybrid swarm intelligence technique , 2007 .

[28]  Daniel C. Kammer Sensor set expansion for modal vibration testing , 2005 .

[29]  Pascal Reuss,et al.  Towards Finite Element Model Updating Based on Nonlinear Normal Modes , 2016 .

[30]  H. Nevzat Özgüven,et al.  Model updating of nonlinear structures from measured FRFs , 2016 .

[31]  J. Prawin,et al.  Nonlinear parametric identification strategy combining reverse path and hybrid dynamic quantum particle swarm optimization , 2016 .

[32]  F. Hemez,et al.  REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT OF MODEL UPDATING FOR NON-LINEAR, TRANSIENT DYNAMICS , 2001 .

[33]  Emmanuel Foltête,et al.  Metrics for nonlinear model updating in structural dynamics , 2009 .

[34]  Guilherme Ferreira Gomes,et al.  An efficient two-step damage identification method using sunflower optimization algorithm and mode shape curvature (MSDBI–SFO) , 2020, Engineering with Computers.

[35]  Pauziah Muhamad,et al.  Conditioned Reverse Path Method on Frame Structure for Damage Detection , 2017 .

[36]  Xin-She Yang,et al.  Bat algorithm: a novel approach for global engineering optimization , 2012, 1211.6663.

[37]  B. Dattaguru,et al.  Generating optimised partitions for parallel finite element computations employing float-encoded genetic algorithms , 2004 .

[38]  Murat Aykan,et al.  Parametric identification of nonlinearity in structural systems using describing function inversion , 2013 .

[39]  A. Rama Mohan Rao,et al.  Structural System Identification Using Quantum behavedParticle Swarm Optimisation Algorithm , 2013 .