Life beyond 30: Probing the −20 < M UV < −17 Luminosity Function at 8 < z < 13 with the NIRCam Parallel Field of the MIRI Deep Survey
暂无分享,去创建一个
Martin P. Ward | O. Fèvre | O. Ilbert | J. Hjorth | F. Walter | G. Wright | L. Colina | A. Eckart | S. Kendrew | P. P'erez-Gonz'alez | T. Tikkanen | T. Greve | A. Alonso-Herrero | K. Caputi | M. Annunziatella | G. Ostlin | J. Pye | L. Costantin | S. Gillman | S. Bosman | P. Rinaldi | D. Langeroodi | P. Werf | P. P'erez-Gonz'alez | 'Angela Garc'ia-Argum'anez | Rosa M. M'erida | J. 'Alvarez-M'arquez | 'Alvaro Labiano | H. U. Noorgaard-Nielsen | J. 'Alvarez-M'arquez | M. Garc'ia-Mar'in
[1] L. Y. Aaron Yung,et al. CEERS Spectroscopic Confirmation of NIRCam-selected z ≳ 8 Galaxy Candidates with JWST/NIRSpec: Initial Characterization of Their Properties , 2023, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.
[2] Dawn,et al. Broad Emission Lines in Optical Spectra of Hot, Dust-obscured Galaxies Can Contribute Significantly to JWST/NIRCam Photometry , 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.
[3] R. Bouwens,et al. UV luminosity density results at z > 8 from the first JWST/NIRCam Fields: Limitations of early data sets and the need for spectroscopy , 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[4] M. Meneghetti,et al. Early Results from GLASS-JWST. XIX. A High Density of Bright Galaxies at z ≈ 10 in the A2744 Region , 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.
[5] H. Rix,et al. Spectroscopic confirmation of four metal-poor galaxies at z = 10.3–13.2 , 2022, Nature Astronomy.
[6] Copenhagen,et al. Identification and properties of intense star-forming galaxies at redshifts z > 10 , 2022, Nature Astronomy.
[7] L. Y. Aaron Yung,et al. CEERS Key Paper. I. An Early Look into the First 500 Myr of Galaxy Formation with JWST , 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.
[8] M. Viel,et al. JWST high-redshift galaxy constraints on warm and cold dark matter models , 2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics.
[9] R. Bouwens,et al. Evolution of the UV LF from z ∼ 15 to z ∼ 8 Using New JWST NIRCam Medium-Band Observations over the HUDF/XDF , 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[10] L. Y. Aaron Yung,et al. CEERS Key Paper. IV. A Triality in the Nature of HST-dark Galaxies , 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.
[11] A. Fontana,et al. The nature of an ultra-faint galaxy in the cosmic dark ages seen with JWST , 2022, Nature.
[12] M. Nonino,et al. A magnified compact galaxy at redshift 9.51 with strong nebular emission lines , 2022, Science.
[13] P. Kroupa,et al. Has JWST Already Falsified Dark-matter-driven Galaxy Formation? , 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.
[14] L. Ho,et al. A Lower Bound of Star Formation Activity in Ultra-high-redshift Galaxies Detected with JWST: Implications for Stellar Populations and Radiation Sources , 2022, Astrophysical Journal Letters.
[15] A. Grazian,et al. JWST unveils heavily obscured (active and passive) sources up to z~13 , 2022, 2208.02825.
[16] L. Y. Aaron Yung,et al. Dusty Starbursts Masquerading as Ultra-high Redshift Galaxies in JWST CEERS Observations , 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.
[17] M. Oguri,et al. A Comprehensive Study of Galaxies at z ∼ 9–16 Found in the Early JWST Data: Ultraviolet Luminosity Functions and Cosmic Star Formation History at the Pre-reionization Epoch , 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.
[18] S. Charlot,et al. On the ages of bright galaxies ∼500 Myr after the Big Bang: insights into star formation activity at z ≳ 15 with JWST , 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[19] L. Y. Aaron Yung,et al. Expectations of the Size Evolution of Massive Galaxies at 3 ≤ z ≤ 6 from the TNG50 Simulation: The CEERS/JWST View , 2022, The Astrophysical Journal.
[20] J. Dunlop,et al. The evolution of the galaxy UV luminosity function at redshifts z ≃ 8 – 15 from deep JWST and ground-based near-infrared imaging , 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[21] L. Y. Aaron Yung,et al. A Long Time Ago in a Galaxy Far, Far Away: A Candidate z ∼ 12 Galaxy in Early JWST CEERS Imaging , 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.
[22] O. Fèvre,et al. COSMOS2020: UV-selected galaxies at z>7.5 , 2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics.
[23] A. Zitrin,et al. First Batch of Candidate Galaxies at Redshifts 11 to 20 Revealed by the James Webb Space Telescope Early Release Observations , 2022, 2207.11558.
[24] C. Conselice,et al. Discovery and properties of ultra-high redshift galaxies (9 < z < 12) in the JWST ERO SMACS 0723 Field , 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[25] R. Bouwens,et al. Two Remarkably Luminous Galaxy Candidates at z ≈ 10–12 Revealed by JWST , 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.
[26] J. Dunlop,et al. A first look at the SMACS0723 JWST ERO: spectroscopic redshifts, stellar masses and star-formation histories , 2022, 2207.08778.
[27] B. Mobasher,et al. Implications of a Temperature-dependent Initial Mass Function. III. Mass Growth and Quiescence , 2022, The Astrophysical Journal.
[28] B. Mobasher,et al. Implications of a Temperature-dependent Initial Mass Function. II. An Updated View of the Star-forming Main Sequence , 2022, The Astrophysical Journal.
[29] G. Caminha,et al. The Galaxy Starburst/Main-sequence Bimodality over Five Decades in Stellar Mass at z ≈ 3–6.5 , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal.
[30] B. Robertson. Galaxy Formation and Reionization: Key Unknowns and Expected Breakthroughs by the James Webb Space Telescope , 2021, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics.
[31] V. Springel,et al. Introducing the THESAN project: radiation-magnetohydrodynamic simulations of the epoch of reionization , 2021, 2110.00584.
[32] A. Loeb,et al. Implications for the Hubble tension from the ages of the oldest astrophysical objects , 2021, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics.
[33] L. Ho,et al. Evidence for GN-z11 as a luminous galaxy at redshift 10.957 , 2020, Nature Astronomy.
[34] Benjamin D. Johnson,et al. Stellar Population Inference with Prospector , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.
[35] S. Furlanetto,et al. A flexible analytic model of cosmic variance in the first billion years , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[36] P. Thomas,et al. First Light And Reionisation Epoch Simulations (FLARES) II: The Photometric Properties of High-Redshift Galaxies , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[37] Andrew P. Hearin,et al. The Universe at z > 10: predictions for JWST from the universemachine DR1 , 2020, 2007.04988.
[38] L. Pentericci,et al. Astraeus – II. Quantifying the impact of cosmic variance during the Epoch of Reionization , 2020, 2004.11096.
[39] P. Thomas,et al. First Light And Reionization Epoch Simulations (FLARES) – I. Environmental dependence of high-redshift galaxy evolution , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[40] O. Ilbert,et al. The synthetic Emission Line COSMOS catalogue: Hα and [O ii] galaxy luminosity functions and counts at 0.3 < z < 2.5 , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[41] S. Finkelstein,et al. Probing the Bright End of the Rest-frame Ultraviolet Luminosity Function at z = 8–10 with Hubble Pure-parallel Imaging , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.
[42] L. Y. Aaron Yung,et al. Semi-analytic forecasts for JWST – IV. Implications for cosmic reionization and LyC escape fraction , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[43] J. Dunlop,et al. A lack of evolution in the very bright end of the galaxy luminosity function from z ≃ 8 to 10 , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[44] R. Bouwens,et al. The Hubble Legacy Field GOODS-S Photometric Catalog , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.
[45] R. Somerville,et al. Cosmic variance of z > 7 galaxies: prediction from bluetides , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[46] J. Speagle. dynesty: a dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[47] V. Springel,et al. First results from the TNG50 simulation: the evolution of stellar and gaseous discs across cosmic time , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[48] V. Springel,et al. First results from the TNG50 simulation: galactic outflows driven by supernovae and black hole feedback , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[49] D. Narayanan,et al. simba: Cosmological simulations with black hole growth and feedback , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[50] A. Casey,et al. An Ultra Metal-poor Star Near the Hydrogen-burning Limit , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.
[51] C. Conselice,et al. Evolution of the galaxy stellar mass functions and UV luminosity functions at z = 6−9 in the Hubble Frontier Fields , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[52] L. Y. Aaron Yung,et al. Semi-analytic forecasts forJWST– I. UV luminosity functions atz = 4–10 , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[53] Chris J. Willott,et al. The JWST Extragalactic Mock Catalog: Modeling Galaxy Populations from the UV through the Near-IR over 13 Billion Years of Cosmic History , 2018, 1802.05272.
[54] A. Fontana,et al. On the Faint End of the Galaxy Luminosity Function in the Epoch of Reionization: Updated Constraints from the HST Frontier Fields , 2017, The Astrophysical Journal.
[55] R. Bouwens,et al. The Dearth of z ∼ 10 Galaxies in All HST Legacy Fields—The Rapid Evolution of the Galaxy Population in the First 500 Myr , 2017, 1710.11131.
[56] Annalisa Pillepich,et al. First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: the stellar mass content of groups and clusters of galaxies , 2017, 1707.03406.
[57] V. Springel,et al. First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: radio haloes and magnetic fields , 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[58] Cca,et al. First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: matter and galaxy clustering , 2017, 1707.03397.
[59] G. Kauffmann,et al. First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: the galaxy colour bimodality , 2017, 1707.03395.
[60] E. Ramirez-Ruiz,et al. First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: a tale of two elements - chemical evolution of magnesium and europium , 2017, 1707.03401.
[61] V. Bromm,et al. Warm dark matter constraints from high-z direct collapse black holes using the JWST , 2017, 1705.00632.
[62] Edward Higson,et al. Dynamic nested sampling: an improved algorithm for parameter estimation and evidence calculation , 2017, Statistics and Computing.
[63] M. Oguri,et al. Full-data Results of Hubble Frontier Fields: UV Luminosity Functions at z ∼ 6–10 and a Consistent Picture of Cosmic Reionization , 2017, 1702.04867.
[64] Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur,et al. Gaia Data Release 1. Summary of the astrometric, photometric, and survey properties , 2016, 1609.04172.
[65] O. Fèvre,et al. THE COSMOS2015 CATALOG: EXPLORING THE 1 < z < 6 UNIVERSE WITH HALF A MILLION GALAXIES , 2016, 1604.02350.
[66] J. Dunlop,et al. The z = 9-10 galaxy population in the Hubble Frontier Fields and CLASH surveys: the z = 9 luminosity function and further evidence for a smooth decline in ultraviolet luminosity density at z≥ 8 , 2016, 1602.05199.
[67] M. Cappellari. Structure and Kinematics of Early-Type Galaxies from Integral Field Spectroscopy , 2016, 1602.04267.
[68] Gregory F. Snyder,et al. The illustris simulation: Public data release , 2015, Astron. Comput..
[69] K. Alatalo,et al. The ATLAS3D Project – XXX. Star formation histories and stellar population scaling relations of early-type galaxies , 2015, 1501.03723.
[70] S. White,et al. The EAGLE simulations of galaxy formation: calibration of subgrid physics and model variations , 2015, 1501.01311.
[71] L. Bigot,et al. Benchmark stars for Gaia Fundamental properties of the Population II star HD 140283 from interferometric, spectroscopic, and photometric data , 2014, 1410.4780.
[72] O. Fèvre,et al. Evolution of the specific star formation rate function at z< 1.4 Dissecting the mass-SFR plane in COSMOS and GOODS , 2014, 1410.4875.
[73] S. White,et al. The EAGLE project: Simulating the evolution and assembly of galaxies and their environments , 2014, 1407.7040.
[74] V. Springel,et al. Introducing the Illustris Project: simulating the coevolution of dark and visible matter in the Universe , 2014, 1405.2921.
[75] Bruno Milliard,et al. Encoding of the infrared excess in the NUVrK color diagram for star-forming galaxies , 2013, 1309.0008.
[76] C. Frenk,et al. The properties of warm dark matter haloes , 2013, 1308.1399.
[77] J. Dunlop,et al. A PUBLIC Ks-SELECTED CATALOG IN THE COSMOS/UltraVISTA FIELD: PHOTOMETRY, PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFTS, AND STELLAR POPULATION PARAMETERS, , 2013, 1303.4410.
[78] Paul M. Brunet,et al. The Gaia mission , 2013, 1303.0303.
[79] P. Kroupa,et al. Evidence for top-heavy stellar initial mass functions with increasing density and decreasing metallicity , 2012, 1202.4755.
[80] S. Ravindranath,et al. CANDELS: THE COSMIC ASSEMBLY NEAR-INFRARED DEEP EXTRAGALACTIC LEGACY SURVEY—THE HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OBSERVATIONS, IMAGING DATA PRODUCTS, AND MOSAICS , 2011, 1105.3753.
[81] J. Gunn,et al. FSPS: Flexible Stellar Population Synthesis , 2010 .
[82] Cambridge,et al. A Universal Stellar Initial Mass Function? A critical look at variations in extreme environments , 2010, 1001.2965.
[83] Paolo Coppi,et al. EAZY: A Fast, Public Photometric Redshift Code , 2008, 0807.1533.
[84] M. Stiavelli,et al. Cosmic Variance and Its Effect on the Luminosity Function Determination in Deep High-z Surveys , 2007, 0712.0398.
[85] G. Rieke,et al. The Stellar Mass Assembly of Galaxies from z = 0 to z = 4: Analysis of a Sample Selected in the Rest-Frame Near-Infrared with Spitzer , 2007, 0709.1354.
[86] P. Hall,et al. The Multiwavelength Survey by Yale-Chile (MUSYC): Deep Near-Infrared Imaging and the Selection of Distant Galaxies , 2006, astro-ph/0612612.
[87] B. Garilli,et al. Accurate photometric redshifts for the CFHT legacy survey calibrated using the VIMOS VLT deep survey , 2006, astro-ph/0603217.
[88] G. Bruzual,et al. Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003 , 2003, astro-ph/0309134.
[89] G. Chabrier. Galactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass Function , 2003, astro-ph/0304382.
[90] P. P. van der Werf,et al. Ultradeep Near-Infrared ISAAC Observations of the Hubble Deep Field South: Observations, Reduction, Multicolor Catalog, and Photometric Redshifts , 2002, astro-ph/0212236.
[91] C. Leitherer,et al. Global Far-Ultraviolet (912-1800 Å) Properties of Star-forming Galaxies , 2002 .
[92] T. Beers,et al. The Chemical Composition and Age of the Metal-poor Halo Star BD +17°3248 , 2002, astro-ph/0202429.
[93] L. Moscardini,et al. Measuring the Redshift Evolution of Clustering: the Hubble Deep Field South , 2001, astro-ph/0109453.
[94] A. Kinney,et al. The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star-forming Galaxies , 1999, astro-ph/9911459.
[95] Richard S. Ellis,et al. Analysis of a complete galaxy redshift survey – II. The field-galaxy luminosity function , 1988 .
[96] J. B. Oke,et al. Secondary standard stars for absolute spectrophotometry , 1983 .
[97] R. Kron. Photometry of a complete sample of faint galaxies. , 1980 .
[98] P. Schechter. An analytic expression for the luminosity function for galaxies , 1976 .
[99] E. D. Friel,et al. The Old Open Clusters of the Milky Way , 1995 .