Flood map boundary sensitivity due to combined effects of DEM resolution and roughness in relation to model performance

Abstract In comprehending flood model results, we performed sensitivity analyses and evaluated how different combinations of digital elevation model (DEM) resolution and Manning’s roughness affect flood maps produced from a 2D hydraulic model. Moreover, we analysed how the estimation of accuracy can further be influenced by the performance measure and the area’s topography. Various combinations of DEM and Manning’s produced different results, in terms of quantified performance in relation to actual flood extent and the generated flood boundaries. High-resolution DEMs performed better with higher Manning’s while lower values were better for lower resolution DEMs. Furthermore, although lower resolution DEMs (25 and 50 m) received higher quantified performances, there are more discrepancies in the flood maps and water surface elevations (WSE) produced by them. The current statistical estimators of model performance do not necessarily provide an accurate estimate of which combination of DEM resolution and roughness are more suitable for application to modelling. Different statistical estimates have different assumptions, which can affect the model selection. Therefore, a more holistic approach towards model selection should be adopted that gives equal importance to statistical estimators, as well as the quality of flood inundation extents.

[1]  G. Schumann,et al.  Comparison of remotely sensed water stages from LiDAR, topographic contours and SRTM , 2008 .

[2]  Stefan Seipel,et al.  Visualisation and evaluation of flood uncertainties based on ensemble modelling , 2016, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[3]  P. Bates,et al.  Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation , 2002 .

[4]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  An adaptive time step solution for raster-based storage cell modelling of floodplain inundation , 2005 .

[5]  N. J. Lim,et al.  Visualising DEM-related flood-map uncertainties using a disparity-distance equation algorithm , 2016 .

[6]  E. Vivoni,et al.  On the effects of triangulated terrain resolution on distributed hydrologic model response , 2005 .

[7]  K. Beven Environmental Modelling , 2007 .

[8]  Matthew D. Wilson,et al.  Simple spatially-distributed models for predicting flood inundation: A review , 2007 .

[9]  P. Bates,et al.  Quantifying the importance of spatial resolution and other factors through global sensitivity analysis of a flood inundation model , 2016 .

[10]  P. Bates,et al.  Distributed whole city water level measurements from the Carlisle 2005 urban flood event and comparison with hydraulic model simulations , 2009 .

[11]  P. D. Batesa,et al.  A simple raster-based model for flood inundation simulation , 2000 .

[12]  Keith Beven,et al.  Uncertainty and equifinality in calibrating distributed roughness coefficients in a flood propagation model with limited data , 1998 .

[13]  D. Solomatine,et al.  Flood modelling : Parameterisation and inflow uncertainty , 2014 .

[14]  P. Bates,et al.  Evaluating the effect of scale in flood inundation modelling in urban environments , 2008 .

[15]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Flood-plain mapping: a critical discussion of deterministic and probabilistic approaches , 2010 .

[16]  P. Bates,et al.  A simple inertial formulation of the shallow water equations for efficient two-dimensional flood inundation modelling. , 2010 .

[17]  Keith Beven,et al.  Estimation of flood inundation probabilities as conditioned on event inundation maps , 2003 .

[18]  P. Bates,et al.  Effects of spatial resolution on a raster based model of flood flow , 2001 .

[19]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Floodplain friction parameterization in two‐dimensional river flood models using vegetation heights derived from airborne scanning laser altimetry , 2003 .

[20]  V. Merwade,et al.  Effect of topographic data, geometric configuration and modeling approach on flood inundation mapping , 2009 .

[21]  Heiko Apel,et al.  Flood risk analyses—how detailed do we need to be? , 2009 .

[22]  Penton Spatial Modelling of Floodplain Inundation Combining Satellite Imagery and Elevation Models , 2007 .

[23]  Topographic data and roughness parameterisation effects on 1D flood inundation models , 2009 .

[24]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Assessing the uncertainty in distributed model predictions using observed binary pattern information within GLUE , 2002 .

[25]  Keith Beven,et al.  Influence of uncertain boundary conditions and model structure on flood inundation predictions. , 2006 .

[26]  P. Bates,et al.  A simple raster-based model for flood inundation simulation , 2000 .

[27]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Distributed Sensitivity Analysis of Flood Inundation Model Calibration , 2005 .

[28]  P. Bates,et al.  Integrating the LISFLOOD‐FP 2D hydrodynamic model with the CAESAR model: implications for modelling landscape evolution , 2013 .

[29]  Fernando Nardi,et al.  Floodplain Terrain Analysis for Coarse Resolution 2D Flood Modeling , 2018, Hydrology.

[30]  Matthew S. Horritt,et al.  A methodology for the validation of uncertain flood inundation models , 2006 .

[31]  L. Vasiliades,et al.  Flood inundation mapping sensitivity to riverine spatial resolution and modelling approach , 2016, Natural Hazards.

[32]  Sven Anders Brandt,et al.  Modeling and visualizing uncertainties of flood boundary delineation: algorithm for slope and DEM resolution dependencies of 1D hydraulic models , 2016, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

[33]  Paul D Bates,et al.  Effects of mesh resolution and topographic representation in 2D finite volume models of shallow water fluvial flow , 2006 .

[34]  Giuliano Di Baldassarre,et al.  Is the current flood of data enough? A treatise on research needs for the improvement of flood modelling , 2012 .

[35]  Yong Wang,et al.  An efficient method for mapping flood extent in a coastal floodplain using Landsat TM and DEM data , 2002 .

[36]  K. Beven,et al.  Uncertainty in the calibration of effective roughness parameters in HEC-RAS using inundation and downstream level observations , 2005 .

[37]  P. Bates,et al.  Utility of different data types for calibrating flood inundation models within a GLUE framework , 2005 .

[38]  Florian Pappenberger,et al.  Deriving distributed roughness values from satellite radar data for flood inundation modelling , 2007 .

[39]  Nancy Joy Lim,et al.  Importance of river bank and floodplain slopes on the accuracy of flood inundation mapping , 2012 .

[40]  K. Bevenb,et al.  Uncertainty and equifinality in calibrating distributed roughness coefficients in a flood propagation model with limited data , 1998 .

[41]  Giuseppe T. Aronica,et al.  Probabilistic flood inundation mapping at ungauged streams due to roughness coefficient uncertainty in hydraulic modelling , 2017 .

[42]  Venkatesh Merwade,et al.  Incorporating the effect of DEM resolution and accuracy for improved flood inundation mapping , 2015 .

[43]  P. Bates,et al.  Calibration of uncertain flood inundation models using remotely sensed water levels. , 2009 .

[44]  S. Lane,et al.  Urban fluvial flood modelling using a two‐dimensional diffusion‐wave treatment, part 1: mesh resolution effects , 2006 .