EDLA Tradeoffs for Wireless Sensor Network Target Tracking

The number of active nodes in a WSN deployment governs both the longevity of the network and the accuracy of applications using the network's data. As node hibernation techniques become more sophistocated, it is important that an accurate evaluation methodology is employed to ensure fair comparisons across different techniques. Examining both energy and accuracy ensures a claim of increased longevity for a particular technique can be contrasted against its associated drop, if any, in application accuracy. This change can also be as a result of increased latency and the accuracy encapsulates many aspects of WSN performance in one metric. In this work, we detail the first in a series of simulation experiments designed to demonstrate the tradeoffs for a WSN and we employ mobility tracking as the application to benchmark accuracy. Additionally, we demonstrate experimental evidence for a potential adaptive mobility tracking protocol.

[1]  Hyuk Lim,et al.  J-Sim: a simulation environment for wireless sensor networks , 2005, 38th Annual Simulation Symposium.

[2]  Yanghee Choi,et al.  Distributed and energy-efficient target localization and tracking in wireless sensor networks , 2006, Comput. Commun..

[3]  Anantha Chandrakasan,et al.  Dynamic Power Management in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2001, IEEE Des. Test Comput..

[4]  Parameswaran Ramanathan,et al.  Distributed target classification and tracking in sensor networks , 2003 .

[5]  Richard Tynan,et al.  Signal Based Node Activation in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Video and Signal Based Surveillance.

[6]  Guoliang Xing,et al.  Integrated coverage and connectivity configuration for energy conservation in sensor networks , 2005, TOSN.

[7]  Mani B. Srivastava,et al.  Poster abstract: density, accuracy, delay and lifetime tradeoffs in wireless sensor networks—a multidimensional design perspective , 2003, SenSys '03.

[8]  Mani B. Srivastava,et al.  Optimizing Sensor Networks in the Energy-Latency-Density Design Space , 2002, IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput..

[9]  Baochun Li,et al.  On the fundamental capacity and lifetime limits of energy-constrained wireless sensor networks , 2004, Proceedings. RTAS 2004. 10th IEEE Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium, 2004..

[10]  Brad Karp,et al.  GPSR: greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks , 2000, MobiCom '00.

[11]  David E. Culler,et al.  Versatile low power media access for wireless sensor networks , 2004, SenSys '04.

[12]  Bhaskar Krishnamachari,et al.  Energy-Quality Tradeoffs for Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2003, IPSN.