Biofuels and resource use efficiency in developing Asia: Back to basics

In Asia, as elsewhere in the world, countries rushed to promote biofuels during the dramatic oil price increases of 2007-2008 as a way to enhance energy security, without waiting for the settlement of controversial debates about the environmental effects of biofuels, especially their effects on greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, biodiversity, and whether biofuels cause a conflict between food and fuel. This paper does not settle this debate, but instead argues that there are straightforward, practical and feasible measures that can be implemented immediately in order to reduce the pressure of biofuels on the environment and food supply, and more generally increase food production. The key is to focus on increasing resource use efficiency in agriculture, especially on different forms of energy use. Resource use efficiency in agriculture is low in many parts of Asia. Concrete measures that could be taken include reductions in market-distorting input subsidies and the introduction of resource-conserving technologies. These could be supplemented with greater use of non-fossil fuels in agricultural production, use of agricultural wastes in energy production, inclusion of input use levels in biofuel certification systems, and greater investment in agricultural research, extension systems, and infrastructure development. Biofuel fever has waned since the onset of the global financial crisis in late 2008, but it is likely to return when economic conditions eventually improve, and possible moves to strengthen the European Union biofuel blending requirements could further accelerate it. Much of the debate on biofuel-related impacts in the region has focused on deforestation, with little attention on agricultural input use, which could also have serious consequences for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In sum, this paper argues that governments can still improve the environmental performance of biofuels while reducing potential conflicts with food security by implementing the straightforward measures suggested here. Though these may appear to be basic textbook suggestions, many governments are still not following them even though the spread of biofuels increases their importance and urgency. The message is that the governments in the region should get back to the basics.

[1]  J. Lingard Agricultural Subsidies and Environmental Change , 2002 .

[2]  F. O. Licht,et al.  World ethanol markets : the outlook to 2015 , 2006 .

[3]  C. Baanante,et al.  Policies to promote environmentally sustainable fertilizer use and supply to 2020 , 1996 .

[4]  R. K. Maikhuri,et al.  Energy and economic analysis of traditional versus introduced crops cultivation in the mountains of the Indian Himalayas: A case study , 2007 .

[5]  David Tilman,et al.  The greening of the green revolution , 1998, Nature.

[6]  Pål Börjesson,et al.  Good or bad bioethanol from a greenhouse gas perspective – What determines this? , 2009 .

[7]  Geoffrey P. Hammond,et al.  Development of biofuels for the UK automotive market , 2008 .

[8]  A. Panagariya Agricultural Liberalisation and the Least Developed Countries: Six Fallacies , 2005 .

[9]  Z. Cai,et al.  Dynamics of crop yields and soil organic carbon in a long-term fertilization experiment in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain of China , 2006 .

[10]  H. F. Gale,et al.  China's New Farm Subsidies , 2005 .

[11]  地球環境戦略研究機関,et al.  Climate change policies in the Asia-Pacific : re-uniting climate change and sustainable development , 2008 .

[12]  S. Polasky,et al.  Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices , 2002, Nature.

[13]  Michael Q. Wang,et al.  The Energy Balance of Corn Ethanol: An Update , 2002 .

[14]  David Pimentel,et al.  Ethanol Fuels: Energy Balance, Economics, and Environmental Impacts Are Negative , 2003 .

[15]  Shabbir H. Gheewala,et al.  Energy balance and GHG-abatement cost of cassava utilization for fuel ethanol in Thailand , 2007 .

[16]  B. E. Vaughan,et al.  Ethanol as Fuel: Energy, Carbon Dioxide Balances, and Ecological Footprint , 2005 .

[17]  David R. Lee,et al.  Policy, Technology and Management Strategies for Achieving Sustainable Agricultural Intensification , 2006 .

[18]  Mark Elder,et al.  Prospects and Challenges of Biofuels in Asia: Policy Implications , 2008 .

[19]  Svend Bram,et al.  Using biomass : A system perturbation analysis , 2009 .

[20]  Keith A. Smith,et al.  N 2 O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels , 2007 .

[21]  R. Yadav FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY TRENDS IN A RICE–WHEAT CROPPING SYSTEM UNDER LONG-TERM USE OF CHEMICAL FERTILIZERS , 1998, Experimental Agriculture.

[22]  K. Fuglie,et al.  PRIVATE INVESTMENT IN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER IN ASIA , 2001 .

[23]  A. Janvry,et al.  World development report 2008 : agriculture for development , 2008 .

[24]  Denny K. S. Ng,et al.  The use of graphical pinch analysis for visualizing water footprint constraints in biofuel production , 2009 .

[25]  Jenifer Piesse,et al.  The Impact of Research Led Agricultural Productivity Growth on Poverty Reduction in Africa, Asia and Latin America , 2003 .

[26]  S. Katz Food to fuel and the world food crisis , 2008 .

[27]  Earthscan Uk Biofuels for transport: global potential and implications for sustainable energy and agriculture. , 2007 .

[28]  Carl K. Eicher,et al.  International agricultural development , 1998 .

[29]  R. Tewatia,et al.  Fertilizer use by crop in India , 2005 .