Tolerance of Macaque Middle STS Body Patch Neurons to Shape-preserving Stimulus Transformations

Functional imaging studies in human and nonhuman primates have demonstrated regions in the brain that show category selectivity for faces or (headless) bodies. Recent fMRI-guided single unit studies of the macaque face category-selective regions have increased our understanding of the response properties of single neurons in these face patches. However, much less is known about the response properties of neurons in the fMRI-defined body category-selective regions (“body patches”). Recently, we reported that the majority of single neurons in one fMRI-defined body patch, the mid-STS body patch, responded more strongly to bodies compared with other objects. Here we assessed the tolerance of these neurons' responses and stimulus preference for shape-preserving image transformations. After mapping the receptive field of the single neurons, we found that their stimulus preference showed a high degree of tolerance for changes in the position and size of the stimulus. However, their response strongly depended on the in-plane orientation of a body. The selectivity of most neurons was, to a large degree, preserved when silhouettes were presented instead of the original textured and shaded images, suggesting that mainly shape-based features are driving these neurons. In a human psychophysical study, we showed that the information present in silhouettes is largely sufficient for body versus nonbody categorization. These data suggest that mid-STS body patch neurons respond predominantly to oriented shape features that are prevalent in images of bodies. Their responses can inform position- and retinal size-invariant body categorization and discrimination based on shape.

[1]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  The distribution of category and location information across object-selective regions in human visual cortex , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Asif A. Ghazanfar,et al.  Human-Monkey Gaze Correlations Reveal Convergent and Divergent Patterns of Movie Viewing , 2010, Current Biology.

[3]  Guy A. Orban,et al.  The Selectivity of Neurons in the Macaque Fundus of the Superior Temporal Area for Three-Dimensional Structure from Motion , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  R. Vogels,et al.  Spatial sensitivity of macaque inferior temporal neurons , 2000, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[5]  C. Gross,et al.  Representations of faces and body parts in macaque temporal cortex: a functional MRI study. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Yifan Peng,et al.  Exploring the role of gaze behavior and object detection in scene understanding , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[7]  R. Watt,et al.  Biological "bar codes" in human faces. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[8]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Visual topography of area TEO in the macaque , 1991, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[9]  I. Biederman,et al.  Effects of illumination intensity and direction on object coding in macaque inferior temporal cortex. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  G. Orban,et al.  Cue-invariant shape selectivity of macaque inferior temporal neurons. , 1993, Science.

[11]  James J. DiCarlo,et al.  How Does the Brain Solve Visual Object Recognition? , 2012, Neuron.

[12]  G Richard,et al.  Ultra-rapid categorisation of natural scenes does not rely on colour cues: a study in monkeys and humans , 2000, Vision Research.

[13]  Wim Vanduffel,et al.  Stimulus representations in body-selective regions of the macaque cortex assessed with event-related fMRI , 2012, NeuroImage.

[14]  A. Little,et al.  Selective attention toward female secondary sexual color in male rhesus macaques , 2006, American journal of primatology.

[15]  Kazuo Hikosaka,et al.  Representation of foveal visual fields in the ventral bank of the superior temporal sulcus in the posterior inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey , 1998, Behavioural Brain Research.

[16]  Elias B. Issa,et al.  Precedence of the Eye Region in Neural Processing of Faces , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  I. Biederman,et al.  Shape Tuning in Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Boris Suchan,et al.  Gradual inversion affects the processing of human body shapes , 2010, NeuroImage.

[19]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Functional Compartmentalization and Viewpoint Generalization Within the Macaque Face-Processing System , 2010, Science.

[21]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Human Body , 2001 .

[22]  D. Perrett,et al.  EFFECT OF IMAGE ORIENTATION AND SIZE ON OBJECT RECOGNITION: RESPONSES OF SINGLE UNITS IN THE MACAQUE MONKEY TEMPORAL CORTEX , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[23]  G. Orban,et al.  Responses of macaque inferior temporal neurons to overlapping shapes. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  R. Vogels,et al.  Inferotemporal neurons represent low-dimensional configurations of parameterized shapes , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  Cortical representations of bodies and faces are strongest in their commonly experienced configurations , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  Guy A Orban,et al.  Coding of images of materials by macaque inferior temporal cortical neurons , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[27]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  What Makes a Cell Face Selective? The Importance of Contrast , 2012, Neuron.

[28]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Object representations in the temporal cortex of monkeys and humans as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. , 1996, Annual review of neuroscience.

[30]  Richard J. Cook,et al.  A look at how we look at others: Orientation inversion and photographic negation disrupt the perception of human bodies , 2011 .

[31]  V. Stone,et al.  The Body-Inversion Effect , 2003, Psychological science.

[32]  David D. Cox,et al.  What response properties do individual neurons need to underlie position and clutter "invariant" object recognition? , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[34]  Charles E Connor,et al.  Underlying principles of visual shape selectivity in posterior inferotemporal cortex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  A face feature space in the macaque temporal lobe , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  Roger B. H. Tootell,et al.  FMRI analysis of contrast polarity in face-selective cortex in humans and monkeys , 2013, NeuroImage.

[37]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Faces and objects in macaque cerebral cortex , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  G. Orban,et al.  Selectivity of Neuronal Adaptation Does Not Match Response Selectivity: A Single-Cell Study of the fMRI Adaptation Paradigm , 2006, Neuron.

[39]  P. Downing,et al.  The neural basis of visual body perception , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[40]  R Vogels,et al.  Coding of stimulus invariances by inferior temporal neurons. , 1996, Progress in brain research.

[41]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  A Cortical Region Consisting Entirely of Face-Selective Cells , 2006, Science.

[42]  Robbe L. T. Goris,et al.  Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience Computational Neuroscience Neural Representations That Support Invariant Object Recognition , 2022 .

[43]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Neural representation for object recognition in inferotemporal cortex , 2016, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[44]  C. Gross,et al.  Neural representations of faces and body parts in macaque and human cortex: a comparative FMRI study. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  Jack L. Gallant,et al.  A Continuous Semantic Space Describes the Representation of Thousands of Object and Action Categories across the Human Brain , 2012, Neuron.