Parametric Study of Vortex Generators on a Super Critical Infinite-Wing to Alleviate Shock-Induced Separation

Parametric study of vortex generators (VGs) on the transonic infinite-wing with two types of airfoil is performed by using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to identify the effects of five parameters: height, aspect ratio, incidence angle, spacing and chord location, on the aerodynamic characteristics. First, SC(2)-0518 airfoil with large thickness ratio and leading edge radius is employed. It becomes obvious that the VG spacing affects the shock wave location significantly. If the spacing is narrow, the shock wave is moved down stream, which increases the lift coefficient at high angle of attack. In contrast, the broad spacing suppresses the fluctuation of the pitching moment coefficients. This difference is caused by the interaction among vortices. The VG height changes the drag coefficients and is correlated with the VG spacing. The other airfoil considered is a cross-section airfoil of NASA common research model (CRM) with small thickness ratio and leading edge radius. The spacing effect with this airfoil is almost the same as that of SC(2)-0518 airfoil while it is revealed that VG is more effective for the airfoil easily stalling. The VG location has little influence, but VG located at more upstream will reduce the shock-induced separation up to larger angles of attack. Additionally, the appropriate incidence angle exists for generating the vortex most efficiently. This appropriate angle is determined by the vortex strength and the energy loss caused by VG. Finally, the aspect ratio controls the vortex strength. VG is not effective at all if the appropriate aspect ratio is not employed.

[1]  Kazuhiro Nakahashi,et al.  Surface triangulation for polygonal models based on CAD data , 2002 .

[2]  Kazuhiro Nakahashi,et al.  Direct Surface Triangulation Using Stereolithography Data , 2002 .

[3]  K. Nakahashi,et al.  Reordering of Hybrid Unstructured Grids for Lower-Upper Symmetric Gauss-Seidel Computations , 1998 .

[4]  Song Fu,et al.  Study of Separation Control of Vortex Generators on Transonic Wings , 2011 .

[5]  J. Dacles-Mariani,et al.  Numerical/experimental study of a wingtip vortex in the near field , 1995 .

[6]  V. Brunet,et al.  Buffet Control by Means of Mechanical and Fluidic Vortex Generators , 2010 .

[7]  Kazuhiro Nakahashi,et al.  Unstructured Mesh Generation For Viscous Flow Computations , 2002, IMR.

[8]  F. Menter Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[9]  Byung Joon Lee,et al.  Design Exploration for Vortex Generators for Boundary-Layer-Ingesting Inlet , 2010 .

[10]  Philippe R. Spalart,et al.  Extensions of the Spalart–Allmaras turbulence model to account for wall roughness , 2003 .

[11]  R. Bur,et al.  Separation control by vortex generator devices in a transonic channel flow , 2009 .

[12]  Erik Wik,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Micro Vortex Generators , 2004 .

[13]  S. Obayashi,et al.  Convergence acceleration of an aeroelastic Navier-Stokes solver , 1994 .

[14]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[15]  K. Nakahashi,et al.  Hybrid Prismatic/Tetrahedral Grid Generation for Viscous Flow Applications , 1998 .

[16]  John C. Vassberg,et al.  Development of a Common Research Model for Applied CFD Validation Studies , 2008 .

[17]  V. Venkatakrishnan Convergence to steady state solutions of the Euler equations on unstructured grids with limiters , 1995 .