Patent citation analysis with Google
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Debora Shaw,et al. Web citation data for impact assessment: A comparison of four science disciplines , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[2] Mike Thelwall,et al. Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations: A multi-discipline exploratory analysis , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[3] Koenraad Debackere,et al. Do science-technology interactions pay off when developing technology? , 2004, Scientometrics.
[4] Liwen Vaughan,et al. Web citation data for impact assessment: A comparison of four science disciplines: Book Reviews , 2005 .
[5] Bart Van Looy,et al. Sources of inspiration? Making sense of scientific references in patents , 2014, Scientometrics.
[6] Wen-Chi Hung. Measuring the use of public research in firm R&D in the Hsinchu Science Park , 2012, Scientometrics.
[7] S. D. De Groote,et al. Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: a case study of the h-index in nursing. , 2012, Nursing outlook.
[8] Mike Thelwall,et al. How is science cited on the Web? A classification of google unique Web citations , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[9] Debora Shaw,et al. Bibliographic and Web citations: What is the difference? , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[10] Henk F. Moed,et al. An exploration of the science base of recent technology , 1990 .
[11] Sadao Nagaoka,et al. Assessing the R&D Management of a Firm in Terms of Speed and Science Linkage: Evidence from the U.S. Patents , 2007 .
[12] Sungjoo Lee,et al. An approach to discovering new technology opportunities: Keyword-based patent map approach , 2009 .
[13] Péter Jacsó,et al. Google Scholar duped and deduped – the aura of “robometrics” , 2011 .
[14] Yi-Ching Liaw,et al. Can the technological impact of academic journals be evaluated? The practice of non-patent reference (NPR) analysis , 2014, Scientometrics.
[15] Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al. The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science , 1997 .
[16] Mike Thelwall,et al. Assessing the impact of disciplinary research on teaching: An automatic analysis of online syllabuses , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[17] Ying He,et al. Patent-bibliometric analysis on the Chinese science — technology linkages , 2007, Scientometrics.
[18] Jean Pierre Courtial,et al. The use of patent titles for identifying the topics of invention and forecasting trends , 1993, Scientometrics.
[19] Bart Van Looy,et al. Delineating the scientific footprint in technology: Identifying scientific publications within non-patent references , 2011, Scientometrics.
[20] Ulrich Schmoch,et al. Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicators , 2005, Scientometrics.
[21] Mike Thelwall,et al. Online presentations as a source of scientific impact? An analysis of PowerPoint files citing academic journals , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[22] Lokman I. Meho,et al. Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[23] M. Gittelman,et al. Applicant and Examiner Citations in US Patents: An Overview and Analysis , 2008 .
[24] Mike Thelwall,et al. Guideline references and academic citations as evidence of the clinical value of health research , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[25] Yuen-Hsien Tseng,et al. Text mining techniques for patent analysis , 2007, Inf. Process. Manag..
[26] Lijun Zhu,et al. Mining Technical Topic Networks from Chinese Patents , 2014, IPaMin@KONVENS.
[27] M. Gittelman,et al. Patent Citations as a Measure of Knowledge Flows: The Influence of Examiner Citations , 2006, The Review of Economics and Statistics.
[28] Gobinda G. Chowdhury,et al. Automatic extraction of citations from the text of English-language patents - an example of template mining , 1996, J. Inf. Sci..
[29] P. Collins,et al. Citations in patents to the basic research literature , 1988 .
[30] Min Deng,et al. The evidence of systematic noise in non-patent references: A study of New Zealand companies’ patents , 2007, Scientometrics.
[31] Mike Thelwall,et al. An automatic method for assessing the teaching impact of books from online academic syllabi , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[32] Mark A. Lemley,et al. Examiner Characteristics and Patent Office Outcomes , 2009, Review of Economics and Statistics.
[33] Francis Narin,et al. Is technology becoming science? , 1985, Scientometrics.
[34] Mike Thelwall,et al. An automatic method for extracting citations from Google Books , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[35] Jacques Michel,et al. Patent citation analysis.A closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports , 2001, Scientometrics.
[36] Nabil Amara,et al. Counting citations in the field of business and management: why use Google Scholar rather than the Web of Science , 2012, Scientometrics.
[37] Francis Narin,et al. Status report: Linkage between technology and science , 1992 .
[38] Wipo. World Intellectual Property Indicators, 2017 edition , 2017 .
[39] Nicolás Robinson-García,et al. The Google scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[40] Koenraad Debackere,et al. Can applied science be ‘good science’? Exploring the relationship between patent citations and citation impact in nanoscience , 2010, Scientometrics.
[41] Joost C. F. de Winter,et al. The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: a longitudinal study , 2013, Scientometrics.
[42] Mike Thelwall,et al. Google book search: Citation analysis for social science and the humanities , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[43] Loet Leydesdorff,et al. The university-industry knowledge relationship: Analyzing patents and the science base of technologies , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[44] Mike Thelwall,et al. Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[45] Yuanyuan Ma,et al. Computer aided system of screening and sorting in data processing for non-patent literature , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Computer Application and System Modeling (ICCASM 2010).
[46] Blaise Cronin,et al. Bibliometrics and beyond: some thoughts on web-based citation analysis , 2001, J. Inf. Sci..
[47] Martin Meyer,et al. Academic patents as an indicator of useful research? A new approach to measure academic inventiveness , 2003 .
[48] Annapoornima M. Subramanian,et al. An empirical examination of the science-technology relationship in the biotechnology industry , 2010 .
[49] Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al. Technological Relevance of Science: An Assessment of Citation Linkages between Patents and Research Papers , 2000, Scientometrics.
[50] M. Meyer. Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature , 2000 .
[51] Manabu Okumura,et al. Automatic extraction of citation information in Japanese patent applications , 2008, International Journal on Digital Libraries.
[52] Koenraad Debackere,et al. Linking science to technology: Using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes , 2004, Scientometrics.
[53] Mu-Hsuan Huang,et al. Technological impact factor: An indicator to measure the impact of academic publications on practical innovation , 2014, J. Informetrics.
[54] Jöran Beel,et al. On the robustness of google scholar against spam , 2010, HT '10.
[55] A. Kulkarni,et al. Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. , 2009, JAMA.
[56] Mike Thelwall,et al. The influence of time and discipline on the magnitude of correlations between citation counts and quality scores , 2015, J. Informetrics.
[57] Wesley M. Cohen. Fifty Years of Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity and Performance , 2010 .
[58] R. Tijssen. Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows , 2001 .
[59] Guo Zhang,et al. Patent citation analysis: Calculating science linkage based on citing motivation , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[60] Patrice Lopez. Automatic Extraction and Resolution of Bibliographical References in Patent Documents , 2010, IRFC.
[61] M. Keary. The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield , 2001 .
[62] R. Liuzzi. Knowledge Bases , 2001 .
[63] Byungun Yoon,et al. A text-mining-based patent network: Analytical tool for high-technology trend , 2004 .
[64] Stefano Brusoni,et al. The knowledge bases of the world’s largest pharmaceutical groups: what do patent citations to non-patent literature reveal? , 2005 .
[65] Madian Khabsa,et al. Digital commons , 2020, Internet Policy Rev..
[66] Judit Bar-Ilan,et al. Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar , 2008, Scientometrics.
[67] Koenraad Debackere,et al. Traces of Prior Art: An analysis of non-patent references found in patent documents , 2006, Scientometrics.
[68] Anne-Wil Harzing,et al. Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis , 2008 .
[69] Szu-chia S. Lo,et al. Scientific linkage of science research and technology development: a case of genetic engineering research , 2009, Scientometrics.
[70] Martin Meyer,et al. What is Special about Patent Citations? Differences between Scientific and Patent Citations , 2000, Scientometrics.
[71] Masashi Shirabe. Identifying SCI covered publications within non-patent references in U.S. utility patents , 2014, Scientometrics.