An Efficient Bifunctional Air Electrode for Reversible Protonic Ceramic Electrochemical Cells

One of the main bottlenecks that limit the performance of reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells (R‐PCECs) is the sluggish kinetics of the oxygen reduction and evolution reactions (ORR and OER). Here, the significantly enhanced ORR and OER kinetics and stability of a conventional La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3–δ (LSCF) air electrode by an efficient catalyst coating of barium cobaltite (BCO) is reported. The polarization resistance of a BCO‐coated LSCF air electrode at 600 °C is 0.16 Ω cm2, about 30% of that of the bare LSCF air electrode under the same conditions. Further, an R‐PCEC with the BCO‐coated LSCF air electrode shows exceptional performance in both fuel cell (peak power density of 1.16 W cm−2 at 600 °C) and electrolysis (current density of 1.80 A cm−2 at 600 °C at 1.3 V) modes. The performance enhancement is attributed mainly to the facilitated rate of oxygen surface exchange.

[1]  Bote Zhao,et al.  An Active and Robust Air Electrode for Reversible Protonic Ceramic Electrochemical Cells , 2021 .

[2]  Yu Chen,et al.  Enhancing Oxygen Reduction Activity and Cr Tolerance of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Cathodes by a Multiphase Catalyst Coating , 2021, Advanced Functional Materials.

[3]  H. Sumi,et al.  Enhanced La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3–-based cathode performance by modification of BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.1Yb0.1O3– electrolyte surface in protonic ceramic fuel cells , 2021 .

[4]  Yu Chen,et al.  Promotion of oxygen reduction reaction on a double perovskite electrode by a water-induced surface modification , 2021, Energy & Environmental Science.

[5]  V. Stevanović,et al.  Triple ionic–electronic conducting oxides for next-generation electrochemical devices , 2020, Nature Materials.

[6]  Mingi Choi,et al.  Effects of water atmosphere on chemical degradation of PrBa0.5Sr0.5Co1.5Fe0.5O5+δ electrodes , 2020 .

[7]  J. M. Serra,et al.  Structure and water uptake in BaLnCo2O6−δ (Ln =La, Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb and Dy) , 2020 .

[8]  H. Sumi,et al.  Performance Comparison of Perovskite Composite Cathodes with BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.1Yb0.1O3–δ in Anode-Supported Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells , 2020 .

[9]  A. O. Rudenko,et al.  Ba(Ce,Zr)O3-based electrodes for protonic ceramic electrochemical cells: towards highly compatible functionality and triple-conducting behaviour , 2020, Russian Chemical Reviews.

[10]  Yong Ding,et al.  Self-sustainable protonic ceramic electrochemical cells using a triple conducting electrode for hydrogen and power production , 2020, Nature Communications.

[11]  N. Sullivan,et al.  Proton-conducting oxides for energy conversion and storage , 2020 .

[12]  Zongping Shao,et al.  Self-Assembled Triple-Conducting Nanocomposite as a Superior Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cell Cathode , 2019, Joule.

[13]  D. Medvedev.  Trends in research and development of protonic ceramic electrolysis cells , 2019, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[14]  M. Ni,et al.  Progress Report on Proton Conducting Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cells , 2019, Advanced Functional Materials.

[15]  W. Sitte,et al.  Effect of Microstructure on the Degradation of La0.6Sr0.4CoO3–δ Electrodes in Dry and Humid Atmospheres , 2019, Fuel Cells.

[16]  J. M. Serra,et al.  Mixed proton and electron conducting double perovskite anodes for stable and efficient tubular proton ceramic electrolysers , 2019, Nature Materials.

[17]  S. Jiang,et al.  Development of lanthanum strontium cobalt ferrite perovskite electrodes of solid oxide fuel cells – A review , 2019, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[18]  N. Sullivan,et al.  Highly efficient reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells for power generation and fuel production , 2019, Nature Energy.

[19]  S. Haile,et al.  Protonic ceramic electrochemical cells for hydrogen production and electricity generation: exceptional reversibility, stability, and demonstrated faradaic efficiency , 2019, Energy & Environmental Science.

[20]  Zongping Shao,et al.  Gas Humidification Impact on the Properties and Performance of Perovskite‐Type Functional Materials in Proton‐Conducting Solid Oxide Cells , 2018, Advanced Functional Materials.

[21]  C. Xia,et al.  Thermal cycling durability improved by doping fluorine to PrBaCo2O5+δ as oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalyst in intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells , 2018, Journal of Power Sources.

[22]  T. B. Britton,et al.  In situ study of strontium segregation in La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3−δ in ambient atmospheres using high-temperature environmental scanning electron microscopy , 2018 .

[23]  Dongwook Shin,et al.  One-dimensional structured La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3−δ - BaCe0.5Zr0.35Y0.15O3−δ composite cathode for protonic ceramic fuel cells , 2018, Solid State Ionics.

[24]  Meilin Liu,et al.  A Highly Efficient Multi-phase Catalyst Dramatically Enhances the Rate of Oxygen Reduction , 2018 .

[25]  S. Haile,et al.  Exceptional power density and stability at intermediate temperatures in protonic ceramic fuel cells , 2018 .

[26]  M. Schroeder,et al.  Surface Cation Segregation and Chromium Deposition on the Double-Perovskite Oxide PrBaCo2O5+δ. , 2018, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[27]  Meilin Liu,et al.  A robust and active hybrid catalyst for facile oxygen reduction in solid oxide fuel cells , 2017 .

[28]  Bilge Yildiz,et al.  Improved chemical and electrochemical stability of perovskite oxides with less reducible cations at the surface. , 2016, Nature materials.

[29]  F. Mauvy,et al.  Chemical and structural stability of La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3−δ ceramic vs. medium/high water vapor pressure , 2015 .

[30]  T. Norby,et al.  Gd- and Pr-based double perovskite cobaltites as oxygen electrodes for proton ceramic fuel cells and electrolyser cells , 2015 .

[31]  Ali Almansoori,et al.  Readily processed protonic ceramic fuel cells with high performance at low temperatures , 2015, Science.

[32]  Meilin Liu,et al.  Triple-conducting layered perovskites as cathode materials for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. , 2014, ChemSusChem.

[33]  Dong Ding,et al.  Enhancing SOFC cathode performance by surface modification through infiltration , 2014, Energy & Environmental Science.

[34]  Meilin Liu,et al.  Suppression of Sr surface segregation in La(1-x)Sr(x)Co(1-y)Fe(y)O(3-δ): a first principles study. , 2013, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[35]  Alexis Grimaud,et al.  Hydration and transport properties of the Pr2−xSrxNiO4+δ compounds as H+-SOFC cathodes , 2012 .

[36]  Shunsuke Taniguchi,et al.  Influence of water vapor on long-term performance and accelerated degradation of solid oxide fuel cell cathodes , 2011 .

[37]  Meilin Liu,et al.  Enhancement of La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-δ durability and surface electrocatalytic activity by La0.85Sr0.15MnO3±δ investigated using a new test electrode platform , 2011 .

[38]  Meilin Liu,et al.  Anode-supported tubular SOFCs based on BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.1Yb0.1O3 − δ electrolyte fabricated by dip coating , 2011 .

[39]  Siwei Wang,et al.  Fabrication and characterization of anode-supported micro-tubular solid oxide fuel cell based on BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.1Yb0.1O3−δ electrolyte , 2011 .

[40]  Wei Liu,et al.  Cathode processes and materials for solid oxide fuel cells with proton conductors as electrolytes , 2010 .

[41]  Fei He,et al.  Electrode performance and analysis of reversible solid oxide fuel cells with proton conducting electrolyte of BaCe0.5Zr0.3Y0.2O3−δ , 2010 .

[42]  Meilin Liu,et al.  A mixed proton, oxygen ion, and electron conducting cathode for SOFCs based on oxide proton conductors , 2010 .

[43]  Fei He,et al.  Cathode reaction models and performance analysis of Sm0.5Sr0.5CoO3−δ–BaCe0.8Sm0.2O3−δ composite cathode for solid oxide fuel cells with proton conducting electrolyte , 2009 .

[44]  Zhe Cheng,et al.  Enhanced Sulfur and Coking Tolerance of a Mixed Ion Conductor for SOFCs: BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.2–xYbxO3–δ , 2009, Science.

[45]  E. Wachsman,et al.  Composite Cathodes for Proton Conducting Electrolytes , 2009 .

[46]  E. Miró,et al.  NOx trapping and soot combustion on BaCoO3−y perovskite: LRS and FTIR characterization , 2005 .

[47]  P Hu,et al.  Catalytic water formation on platinum: a first-principles study. , 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[48]  A. Jacobson,et al.  An investigation of the structure of 12HBaCoO2.6 by electron microscopy and powder neutron diffraction , 1980 .

[49]  Meilin Liu,et al.  An In Situ Formed, Dual‐Phase Cathode with a Highly Active Catalyst Coating for Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells , 2018 .

[50]  R. Song,et al.  Fabrication of anode-supported tubular Ba(Zr0.1Ce0.7Y0.2)O3−δ cell for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells , 2014 .

[51]  Feng Liu,et al.  Reaction model for cathodes cooperated with oxygen-ion conductors for solid oxide fuel cells using proton-conducting electrolytes , 2012 .

[52]  A. Grimaud,et al.  Hydration Properties and Rate Determining Steps of the Oxygen Reduction Reaction of Perovskite-Related Oxides as H+-SOFC Cathodes , 2012 .

[53]  H. Iwahara,et al.  Polarization at Pt electrodes of a fuel cell with a high temperature-type proton conductive solid electrolyte , 1985 .