Voxelized Breast Phantoms for Dosimetry in Mammography

X-ray breast imaging techniques are an essential part of breast cancer screening programs and their improvements lead to gain in performance and accuracy. Radiation dose estimate and control play an important role in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis investigations, since the risk of radioinduced cancer to the gland must be contained and dose delivered to the gland must be declared in the medical report. The actual dosimetric protocols suggest the assessment of radiation dose by means of Monte Carlo calculation on digital breast phantoms, providing the assumption of the homogeneous mixture of glandular and adipose tissues within the breast organ, leading to a drastic approximation. In line with the trend of other research groups, with the aim of improving the Monte Carlo model, in the current work a new heterogeneous digital breast model is proposed, involving a voxelized approach and disengaging from the concept of homogeneous phantom. The proposed model is based on new findings in the literature and after a validation process, the model is adopted to evaluate mean glandular dose discrepancies with the traditional model which is adopted in clinic for decades.

[1]  D. Dance,et al.  Estimation of mean glandular dose for breast tomosynthesis: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  A. Sarno,et al.  Normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and dedicated breast CT. , 2018, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[3]  E. Pauwels,et al.  Breast Cancer Induced by X-Ray Mammography Screening? A Review Based on Recent Understanding of Low-Dose Radiobiology , 2015, Medical Principles and Practice.

[4]  A. Sarno,et al.  Air kerma calculation in Monte Carlo simulations for deriving normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography. , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  J. Boone,et al.  Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment. , 1999, Radiology.

[6]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Suitability of low density materials for 3D printing of physical breast phantoms. , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Giovanni Mettivier,et al.  Dedicated breast computed tomography: Basic aspects. , 2015, Medical physics.

[8]  A. Dell'Acqua,et al.  Geant4 - A simulation toolkit , 2003 .

[9]  J. S. Laughlin,et al.  Absorbed radiation dose in mammography. , 1979, Radiology.

[10]  K Bliznakova,et al.  Homogeneous vs. patient specific breast models for Monte Carlo evaluation of mean glandular dose in mammography. , 2018, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[11]  Maria Evelina Fantacci,et al.  Comprehensive assessment of image quality in synthetic and digital mammography: a quantitative comparison , 2019, Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine.

[12]  K Bliznakova,et al.  GEANT4 Monte Carlo simulations for virtual clinical trials in breast X-ray imaging: Proof of concept. , 2020, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[13]  Absorbed Radiation Dose , 2020, Definitions.

[14]  Andrew M. Hernandez,et al.  Breast dose in mammography is about 30% lower when realistic heterogeneous glandular distributions are considered. , 2015, Medical physics.

[15]  Ioannis Sechopoulos,et al.  Radiation dosimetry in digital breast tomosynthesis: report of AAPM Tomosynthesis Subcommittee Task Group 223. , 2014, Medical physics.

[16]  G. Barnes,et al.  Normalized average glandular dose in molybdenum target-rhodium filter and rhodium target-rhodium filter mammography. , 1994, Radiology.

[17]  Andrew M. Hernandez,et al.  Mean glandular dose coefficients (DgN) for x-ray spectra used in contemporary breast imaging systems , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  I. Sechopoulos.  A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part I. The image acquisition process. , 2013, Medical physics.

[19]  Davide Caramella,et al.  Monte Carlo Methods for Assessment of the Mean Glandular Dose in Mammography: Simulations in Homogeneous Phantoms , 2019, BIOINFORMATICS.

[20]  J. Boone,et al.  The effect of skin thickness determined using breast CT on mammographic dosimetry. , 2008, Medical physics.

[21]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Breast dosimetry using high-resolution voxel phantoms. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[22]  Davide Caramella,et al.  Image Quality Comparison between Synthetic 2D Mammograms Obtained with 15º and 40º X-ray Tube Angular Range: A Quantitative Phantom Study , 2020, BIOIMAGING.

[23]  I. Sechopoulos.  A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part II. Image reconstruction, processing and analysis, and advanced applications. , 2013, Medical physics.

[24]  Davide Caramella,et al.  3D Printing Materials for Physical Breast Phantoms: Monte Carlo Assessment and Experimental Validation , 2020, BIODEVICES.

[25]  Kai Yang,et al.  The characterization of breast anatomical metrics using dedicated breast CT. , 2011, Medical physics.

[26]  D. Dance,et al.  Dosimetry in x-ray-based breast imaging. , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  A. Gavin,et al.  Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018. , 2018, European journal of cancer.

[28]  A. Sarno,et al.  Monte Carlo calculation of monoenergetic and polyenergetic DgN coefficients for mean glandular dose estimates in mammography using a homogeneous breast model , 2019, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  J. Boone.  Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary X-ray spectra in mammography: computer-fit values of Monte Carlo derived data. , 2002, Medical physics.