Investigating the Effects of Geometrical Parameters of Re-Entrant Cells of Aluminum 7075-T651 Auxetic Structures on Fatigue Life

In this study, the effects of two geometrical parameters of the re-entrant auxetic cells, namely, internal cell angle (θ) and H/L ratio in which H is the cell height, and L is the cell length, have been studied on the variations of Poisson’s ratio and fatigue life of Aluminum 7075-T6 auxetic structures. Five different values of both the H/L ratio and angle θ were selected. Numerical simulations and fatigue life predictions have been conducted through the use of ABAQUS (version 2022) and MSC Fatigue (version 11.0) software. Results revealed that increases in both the H/L ratio and angle θ improved the average value of Poisson’s ratio. Increasing the H/L ratio from 1 to 1.4 and θ from 50° to 70° increased the values of Poisson’s ratio, respectively, 7.7% and 80%. In all angles, increasing the H/L values decreased the fatigue life of the structures significantly. Furthermore, in all H/L values, an increment in θ caused a reduction in fatigue life. The effects of H/L and θ parameters on fatigue life were dominant in the low cycle fatigue regime. Results also showed that the H/L ratio parameter had greater influence as compared to the θ angle, and the structures with higher auxeticity experienced higher fatigue resistance. It was found that the auxetic property of the structure has a direct relationship with the fatigue resistance of the structure. In all samples, structures with greater auxetic property had higher fatigue resistance.

[1]  S. Glodež,et al.  Fatigue behaviour of re-entrant auxetic structures made of the aluminium alloy AA7075-T651 , 2022, Thin-Walled Structures.

[2]  S. Glodež,et al.  Fatigue crack growth in the re-entrant auxetic structure , 2022, Procedia Structural Integrity.

[3]  S. Glodež,et al.  Modelling and predicting of the LCF-behaviour of aluminium auxetic structures , 2021, International Journal of Fatigue.

[4]  J. Tomków,et al.  Induction Assisted Hybrid Friction Stir Welding of Dissimilar Materials AA5052 Aluminium Alloy and X12Cr13 Stainless Steel , 2021, Advances in Materials Science.

[5]  D. Pons,et al.  Internal Flow Behaviour and Microstructural Evolution of the Bobbin-FSW Welds: Thermomechanical Comparison between 1xxx and 3xxx Aluminium Grades , 2021, Advances in Materials Science.

[6]  S. Glodež,et al.  Computational Fatigue Analysis of Auxetic Cellular Structures Made of SLM AlSi10Mg Alloy , 2020, Metals.

[7]  S. Glodež,et al.  The computational LCF-analyses of chiral and Re-entrant auxetic structure using the direct cyclic algorithm , 2020 .

[8]  F. Senatov,et al.  Low-cycle fatigue behavior of 3D-printed metallic auxetic structure , 2020 .

[9]  S. Glodež,et al.  Numerical modelling of a chiral auxetic cellular structure under multiaxial loading conditions , 2020, Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics.

[10]  M. Haddar,et al.  Experimental and analytical investigation of the bending behaviour of 3D-printed bio-based sandwich structures composites with auxetic core under cyclic fatigue tests , 2020 .

[11]  A. Baldi,et al.  An Investigation of the Enhanced Fatigue Performance of Low-porosity Auxetic Metamaterials , 2020, Experimental Mechanics.

[12]  Srečko Glodež,et al.  Fatigue crack initiation and propagation in re-entrant auxetic cellular structures , 2019, International Journal of Fatigue.

[13]  S. Glodež,et al.  Assessing the cracking behavior of auxetic cellular structures by using both a numerical and an experimental approach , 2019, Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics.

[14]  Somnath Ghosh,et al.  Microstructure and property based statistically equivalent RVEs for polycrystalline-polyphase aluminum alloys , 2019, International Journal of Plasticity.

[15]  J. Klemenc,et al.  Low‐cycle fatigue life of thin‐plate auxetic cellular structures made from aluminium alloy 7075‐T651 , 2019, Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures.

[16]  Zheng-Dong Ma,et al.  Crashworthiness analysis of double-arrowed auxetic structure under axial impact loading , 2019, Materials & Design.

[17]  Fenghua Zhang,et al.  Low Fatigue Dynamic Auxetic Lattices With 3D Printable, Multistable, and Tuneable Unit Cells , 2018, Front. Mater..

[18]  Yi Min Xie,et al.  Design and characterisation of a tuneable 3D buckling-induced auxetic metamaterial , 2018 .

[19]  Mohsen Safikhani Nasim,et al.  Three dimensional modeling of warp and woof periodic auxetic cellular structure , 2018 .

[20]  Tuan Ngo,et al.  Blast resistance of auxetic and honeycomb sandwich panels: Comparisons and parametric designs , 2018 .

[21]  Roderic S. Lakes,et al.  Negative-Poisson's-Ratio Materials: Auxetic Solids , 2017 .

[22]  T. Lim Auxetic Materials and Structures , 2014 .

[23]  J. Li,et al.  A modification of Smith–Watson–Topper damage parameter for fatigue life prediction under non‐proportional loading , 2012 .

[24]  Adam Niesłony,et al.  New method for evaluation of the Manson–Coffin–Basquin and Ramberg–Osgood equations with respect to compatibility , 2008 .

[25]  Fabrizio Scarpa,et al.  Mechanical behaviour of conventional and negative Poisson’s ratio thermoplastic polyurethane foams under compressive cyclic loading , 2007 .

[26]  R. S. Lakes,et al.  Non-linear properties of metallic cellular materials with a negative Poisson's ratio , 1992 .