A Comparative Study of LoRaWAN, SigFox, and NB-IoT for Smart Water Grid

Low Power Wide Area Networks (LPWAN) are becoming the powerful communication technologies of the IoT of tomorrow. LoRaWAN, SigFox, and NB-IoT are the three competing LPWAN technologies. On the other hand, Smart Water Grid (SWG) is an emerging paradigm that promises to over come issues such as pipes leaks encountered by current water infrastructure by deploying smart devices into the water infrastructure for monitoring purposes. This paper firstly explores the physical and communication features of the above LPWAN technologies and provides a comprehensive comparison between them as well as their suitability for the Smart Water Grid (SWG) use case. The important aspect of SWG is to connect devices such as smart water meters and other tiny devices like sensors installed into the water pipelines for the system monitoring purpose. We consider Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) also called Smart Water Metering when dealing with the water grid, which is the main application of SWG and we study the scalability of LoRaWAN, NB-IoT, and SigFox in such application. Under NS3, the simulation results show that NB-IoT provides the best scalability compared to LoRaWAN and SigFox and thus is able to support a huge number of devices with a low packet error rate.

[1]  T. Ferré.  Practical Handbook of Soil, Vadose Zone, and Ground-Water Contamination: Assessment, Prevention, and Remediation , 2006 .

[2]  Kais Mekki,et al.  Overview of Cellular LPWAN Technologies for IoT Deployment: Sigfox, LoRaWAN, and NB-IoT , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops).

[3]  Mritunjay Kumar Rai,et al.  A Comparative Study on Various LPWAN and Cellular Communication Technologies for IoT Based Smart Applications , 2018, 2018 International Conference on Emerging Trends and Innovations In Engineering And Technological Research (ICETIETR).

[4]  Phone Lin,et al.  A survey on NB-IoT downlink scheduling: Issues and potential solutions , 2017, 2017 13th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC).

[5]  Hamid Sharif,et al.  A Survey on Smart Grid Communication Infrastructures: Motivations, Requirements and Challenges , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[6]  Fernand Meyer,et al.  A comparative study of LPWAN technologies for large-scale IoT deployment , 2019, ICT Express.

[7]  István Z. Kovács,et al.  Coverage and Capacity Analysis of Sigfox, LoRa, GPRS, and NB-IoT , 2017, 2017 IEEE 85th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[8]  Chau Yuen,et al.  Exploiting QoS flexibility for smart grid and IoT applications using TV white spaces , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[9]  Abed Ellatif Samhat,et al.  Internet of Mobile Things: Overview of LoRaWAN, DASH7, and NB-IoT in LPWANs Standards and Supported Mobility , 2019, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[10]  Benoît Parrein,et al.  MAC layer-based evaluation of IoT technologies: LoRa, SigFox and NB-IoT , 2018, 2018 IEEE Middle East and North Africa Communications Conference (MENACOMM).

[11]  Thomas H. Clausen,et al.  A Study of LoRa: Long Range & Low Power Networks for the Internet of Things , 2016, Sensors.

[12]  Ingrid Moerman,et al.  Scalability Analysis of Large-Scale LoRaWAN Networks in ns-3 , 2017, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.