Comparison of the Airtraq and the Macintosh laryngoscope for double-lumen tube intubation: A randomised clinical trial

CONTEXT The Airtraq is a disposable optical laryngoscope that is available in a double-lumen tube version. Inserting a double-lumen tube is generally more difficult compared to conventional endotracheal intubation, mainly due to its configuration. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare the Airtraq with the Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation with a double-lumen tube in patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery. The main outcome was time needed for successful intubation. DESIGN Prospective, randomised clinical trial. SETTING A single centre, University Hospital of Würzburg, Germany, between July 2009 and June 2011. PATIENTS After a scout laryngoscopy with a Macintosh laryngoscope, 60 adult patients were intubated by an anaesthesiologist with either an Airtraq (n = 30) or a Macintosh laryngoscope (n = 30). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The time needed for correct intubation, checked by flexible bronchoscopy, was recorded. The intubation difficulty scale (IDS) and Cormack and Lehane grade were noted. Haemodynamic variables and any evidence of oropharyngeal trauma were documented as well as postoperative sore throat, hoarseness and dysphagia. RESULTS The mean time needed for correct intubation was 20.1 ± 16.5 s in the Airtraq group and 17.5 ± 10 s in the Macintosh group (P = 0.86). All intubations in both groups had an IDS less than 4. The Cormack and Lehane grade was I in all 30 patients in the Airtraq group; in the Macintosh group, it was I and II in 17 and 13 patients, respectively. The incidence of hoarseness was significantly higher in the Airtraq group 24 h postoperatively (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION There was no significant difference between the Airtraq and the Macintosh laryngoscopes regarding the time needed to insert a double-lumen tube during elective thoracic surgery. Only subtle enhancement of visualisation and a higher incidence of hoarseness were observed in the Airtraq group. The Airtraq device did not result in superior patient safety in this setting.

[1]  Y. Zhu,et al.  Airtraq laryngoscope versus conventional Macintosh laryngoscope: a systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2011, Anaesthesia.

[2]  G. Grubhofer,et al.  Randomized clinical trial comparing double-lumen tube and EZ-Blocker for single-lung ventilation. , 2011, British journal of anaesthesia.

[3]  I. Takenaka,et al.  Efficacy of the Airway Scope on tracheal intubation in the lateral position: comparison with the Macintosh laryngoscope , 2011, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[4]  P. Di Marco,et al.  Learning Curves of the Airtraq and the Macintosh Laryngoscopes for Tracheal Intubation by Novice Laryngoscopists: A Clinical Study , 2011, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[5]  N. Shimoyama,et al.  [New lung isolation device, Fuggiano's bronchial blocker, facilitates lung isolation more effectively]. , 2010, Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology.

[6]  J. Koh,et al.  Comparison of the laryngeal view during intubation using Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients with cervical spine immobilization and mouth opening limitation , 2010, Korean journal of anesthesiology.

[7]  M. Drissi,et al.  Erratum à: Le vidéolaryngoscope permet une intubation avec un tube à double lumière plus rapide que le laryngoscope standard , 2010 .

[8]  A. Akhaddar,et al.  [Faster double-lumen tube intubation with the videolaryngoscope than with a standard laryngoscope]. , 2010, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[9]  R Maassen,et al.  Correspondence: Comparison of the C‐MAC® videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh, Glidescope® and Airtraq® laryngoscopes in easy and difficult laryngoscopy scenarios in manikins , 2010, Anaesthesia.

[10]  Javier H. Campos.  Lung isolation techniques for patients with difficult airway , 2010, Current opinion in anaesthesiology.

[11]  J. Scholz,et al.  Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope , 2010, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[12]  T. Yamazaki,et al.  The airway scope is a practical intubation device for a double-lumen tube during rapid-sequence induction. , 2009, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[13]  G. Savoldelli,et al.  Learning curves of the Glidescope, the McGrath and the Airtraq laryngoscopes: a manikin study , 2009, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[14]  S. Hill,et al.  Airtraq laryngoscope for bronchial blocker placement in a difficult airway , 2009, Anaesthesia.

[15]  P. Kranke,et al.  Comparison of the Glidescope® and Airtraq® optical laryngoscopes in patients undergoing direct microlaryngoscopy , 2009, Anaesthesia.

[16]  Y. Hirabayashi,et al.  Airtraq optical laryngoscope: tracheal intubation by novice laryngoscopists , 2009, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[17]  W. Wang,et al.  Sore Throat or Hoarse Voice with Bronchial Blockers or Double-Lumen Tubes for Lung Isolation: A Randomised, Prospective Trial , 2008, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[18]  J. Laffey,et al.  Evaluation of the Airtraq® and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients at increased risk for difficult tracheal intubation* , 2008, Anaesthesia.

[19]  Y. Hirabayashi,et al.  The Airtraq® laryngoscope for placement of double-lumen endobronchial tube , 2007, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[20]  J. Laffey,et al.  Endotracheal Intubation in Patients with Cervical Spine Immobilization: A Comparison of Macintosh and Airtraq Laryngoscopes , 2007, Anesthesiology.

[21]  Javier H. Campos.  Which device should be considered the best for lung isolation: double-lumen endotracheal tube versus bronchial blockers , 2007, Current opinion in anaesthesiology.

[22]  J. Laffey,et al.  A comparison of tracheal intubation using the Airtraq® or the Macintosh laryngoscope in routine airway management: a randomised, controlled clinical trial , 2006, Anaesthesia.

[23]  J. Schreiber,et al.  Airway Injuries after One-lung Ventilation: A Comparison between Double-lumen Tube and Endobronchial Blocker: A Randomized, Prospective, Controlled Trial , 2006, Anesthesiology.

[24]  B. Harte,et al.  Learning and performance of tracheal intubation by novice personnel: a comparison of the Airtraq® and Macintosh laryngoscope , 2006, Anaesthesia.

[25]  E. Cantürk,et al.  Bronchial rupture with a left‐sided polyvinylchloride double‐lumen tube , 2003, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[26]  F Adnet,et al.  The Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS): Proposal and Evaluation of a New Score Characterizing the Complexity of Endotracheal Intubation , 1997, Anesthesiology.

[27]  C. Jackson.  The technique of insertion of intratracheal insufflation tubes , 1996 .

[28]  J. Benumof,et al.  Quantitative improvement in laryngoscopic view by optimal external laryngeal manipulation. , 1996, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[29]  R. Knill.  Difficult laryngoscopy made easy with a “BURP” , 1993, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[30]  L. Gugino,et al.  A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study. , 1986, Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal.

[31]  R S Cormack,et al.  Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics , 1983, Anaesthesia.