Tracking R&D behavior: bibliometric analysis of drug patents in the Orange Book

The Publication Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (commonly known as the Orange Book) identifies drug products approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) for safety and effectiveness, and provides substantial information on new drug applications (NDAs) with patent data. To explore the patterns among drug patents in the Orange Book, this study used patent bibliometric analysis. The productivity and impact are presented at the assignee level and applicant level, respectively, and the applicant’s patent portfolio is further discussed. 2,033 drug patents are identified in this current study. Our findings indicate that the applicant’s patent portfolio in the Orange Book is helpful in revealing the technological capability and patent strategy of the pharmaceutical incumbents. By linking drug data and patent information, this current study sheds light on patent research in the pharmaceutical industry.

[1]  J. Knoben,et al.  An overview of the FDA publication Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. , 1990, American journal of hospital pharmacy.

[2]  Fei Shi,et al.  Patent activity on water pollution and treatment in China—a scientometric perspective , 2010, Scientometrics.

[3]  Michael E. D. Koenig,et al.  Impact of mergers & acquisitions on research productivity within the pharmaceutical industry , 2004, Scientometrics.

[4]  Eric J. Iversen An Excursion into the Patent-Bibliometrics of Norwegian Patenting , 2004, Scientometrics.

[5]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Research cooperation within the bio-pharmaceutical industry: Network analyses of co-publications within and between firms , 2007, Scientometrics.

[6]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[7]  Yu-Shan Chen,et al.  Analyzing the nonlinear effects of firm size, profitability, and employee productivity on patent citations of the US pharmaceutical companies by using artificial neural network , 2009, Scientometrics.

[8]  Yu-Shan Chen,et al.  Using neural network to analyze the influence of the patent performance upon the market value of the US pharmaceutical companies , 2009, Scientometrics.

[9]  G. Steven McMillan,et al.  The public science base of US biotechnology: A citation-weighted approach , 2007, Scientometrics.

[10]  Marco Ceccagnoli,et al.  Productivity and the Role of Complementary Assets in Firms’ Demand for Technology Innovations , 2009 .

[11]  Szu-chia Lo,et al.  Patent analysis of genetic engineering research in Japan, Korea and Taiwan , 2007, Scientometrics.

[12]  J. DiMasi,et al.  Risks in new drug development: Approval success rates for investigational drugs , 2001, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[13]  Icíar Dominguez Lacasa,et al.  Capturing the changes in the knowledge base underlying drug discovery and development in the 20th century and the adjustment of Bayer, Hoechst, Schering AG and E. Merck to the advent of modern biotechnology , 2006, Scientometrics.

[14]  Yuh-Shan Ho,et al.  A bibliometric analysis of the performance of Water Research , 2010, Scientometrics.

[15]  Manuel Acosta,et al.  Exploring the quality of environmental technology in Europe: evidence from patent citations , 2009, Scientometrics.

[16]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Large firms and the science-technology interface Patents, patent citations, and scientific output of multinational corporations in thin films , 2003, Scientometrics.

[17]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Developing Technology in the Vicinity of Science: An Examination of the Relationship between Science Intensity (of Patents) and Technological Productivity within the Field of Biotechnology , 2006 .

[18]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[19]  R. D. Hamilton,et al.  Using Bibliometrics to Measure Firm Knowledge: An Analysis of the US Pharmaceutical Industry , 2000 .

[20]  Mu-Hsuan Huang,et al.  Core technologies and key industries in Taiwan from 1978 to 2002: A perspective from patent analysis , 2005, Scientometrics.

[21]  Francis Narin,et al.  Patent bibliometrics , 2005, Scientometrics.

[22]  Szu-chia Lo,et al.  Patent coupling analysis of primary organizations in genetic engineering research , 2008, Scientometrics.

[23]  Junping Qiu,et al.  A longitudinal analysis of citation distribution breadth for Chinese scholars , 2010, Scientometrics.

[24]  Rajesh K. Chandy,et al.  From Invention to Innovation: Conversion Ability in Product Development , 2006 .

[25]  Yu-Shan Chen,et al.  The nonlinear nature of the relationships between the patent traits and corporate performance , 2009, Scientometrics.

[26]  Iciar Dominguez-Lacasa Capturing the changes in the knowledge base underlying drug discovery and development in the 20th century and the adjustment of Bayer, Hoechst, Schering AG and E. Merck to the advent of modern biotechnology , 2006 .

[27]  Laurie L. Hill,et al.  The Orange Book , 2005, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.