Critical source area controls on water quality in an agricultural watershed located in the Chesapeake basin.

The importance of agricultural land use activities for supplying nutrients (N, P) to the Chesapeake Bay is examined and nutrient sources for a typical agricultural hill-land watershed within the Chesapeake Basin are identified and assessed. Based on up to 30 years of experimental and monitoring data, the outflow, N, and P exported from this Pennsylvania watershed is examined in terms of critical source areas. Most of the surface runoff and P export occurs from areas near the stream. About 90% of the algal-available P exported in outflow was generated during the largest 7 storms/year. In contrast, nearly all the nitrate (NO3) exported originated as subsurface flow entering the soil or ground water some distance from the stream, and mostly occurred during nonstorm flow periods. The NO3 export observed over the long term corresponds to the N excess computed by N balance obtained by farmer survey for agricultural land. By combining land use, hydrologic processes, watershed position, soil P status, and N balance information for agricultural land, the major source areas for P and N are predictable and identifiable. We apply these ideas and techniques to our research watershed and present the results as an example of this approach.

[1]  R. D. Black,et al.  Partial Area Contributions to Storm Runoff in a Small New England Watershed , 1970 .

[2]  W. Gburek,et al.  Phosphate movement from an agricultural watershed during two rainfall periods , 1972 .

[3]  Donald E. Weller,et al.  Effects of agriculture on discharges of nutrients from Coastal Plain watersheds of Chesapeake Bay , 1997 .

[4]  K. Steele.  Animal Waste and the Land-Water Interface , 1995 .

[5]  W. Gburek.  Initial contributing area of a small watershed , 1990 .

[6]  W. Boynton,et al.  A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NUTRIENTS AND OTHER FACTORS INFLUENCING ESTUARINE PHYTOPLANKTON PRODUCTION , 1982 .

[7]  W. Gburek,et al.  Hydrologic Controls in Nitrate, Sulfate, and Chloride Concentrations , 1993 .

[8]  T. Malone,et al.  Influences of river flow on the dynamics of phytoplankton production in a partially stratified estuary , 1988 .

[9]  Robert M. Summers,et al.  Inputs, transformations, and transport of nitrogen and phosphorus in Chesapeake Bay and selected tributaries , 1995 .

[10]  A. Sharpley,et al.  Seasonal flow, nutrient concentrations and loading patterns in stream flow draining an agricultural hill-land watershed , 1999 .

[11]  A. Sharpley,et al.  Hydrologic Controls on Phosphorus Loss from Upland Agricultural Watersheds , 1998 .

[12]  W. J. Gburek,et al.  Flow and nutrient export patterns for an agricultural hill-land watershed , 1996 .

[13]  A. S. Rogowski,et al.  Chemical‐hydrologic interactions in the near‐stream zone , 1988 .

[14]  Donald E. Weller,et al.  NONPOINT SOURCE DISCHARGES OF NUTRIENTS FROM PIEDMONT WATERSHEDS OF CHESAPEAKE BAY 1 , 1997 .

[15]  Alan W. Taylor,et al.  Phosphate Equilibria on Stream Sediment and Soil in a Watershed Draining an Agricultural Region , 1971 .

[16]  J. L. Taft,et al.  Seasonal oxygen depletion in Chesapeake Bay , 1980 .

[17]  J. H. Tuttle,et al.  Lateral variation in the production and fate of phytoplankton in a partially stratified estuary , 1986 .

[18]  W. Gburek,et al.  Soluble Phosphate Output of an Agricultural Watershed in Pennsylvania , 1974 .

[19]  Tammo S. Steenhuis,et al.  SMoRMod – A GIS-integrated Rainfall-runoff Model , 1996 .

[20]  H. Pionke,et al.  PHOSPHORUS STATUS AND CONTENT OF SUSPENDED SEDIMENT IN A PENNSYLVANIA WATERSHED , 1992 .

[21]  L E Cronin,et al.  Chesapeake Bay Anoxia: Origin, Development, and Significance , 1984, Science.

[22]  H. Pionke,et al.  Effect of Agricultural Land Use on Ground-Water Quality in a Small Pennsylvania Watersheda , 1985 .

[23]  R. C. Ward,et al.  On the response to precipitation of headwater streams in humid areas , 1984 .

[24]  D. Weller,et al.  Nutrients and chlorophyll at the interface of a watershed and an estuary , 1991 .