Playing the ‘Name Game’ to identify academic patents in Germany

Identifying academic inventors is crucial for reliable assessments of academic patenting and for understanding patent-based university-to-industry technology transfer. It requires solving the “who is who” problem at the individual inventor level. This article describes data collection and matching techniques applied to identify academic inventors in Germany. To manage the large dataset, we adjust a matching technique applied in prior research by comparing the inventor and professor names in the first step after cleaning. We also suggest a new approach for determining the similarity score. To evaluate our methodology we apply it to the EP-INV-PatStat database and compare its results to alternative approaches. For our German data, results are less sensitive to the choice of name comparison algorithm than to the specific filtering criteria employed. Restricting the search to EPO applications or identifying inventors by professor title underestimates academic patenting in Germany.

[1]  William W. Cohen,et al.  A Comparison of String Metrics for Matching Names and Records , 2003 .

[2]  Guido Buenstorf,et al.  Not invented here: technology licensing, knowledge transfer and innovation based on public research , 2009 .

[3]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[4]  M. Mejer Entrepreneurial Scientists and their Publication Performance. An Insight from Belgium , 2011 .

[5]  Patrick Llerena,et al.  Academic patenting in Europe: new evidence from the KEINS database , 2008 .

[6]  Anne W. Fuller,et al.  Us Faculty Patenting: Inside and Outside the University , 2007 .

[7]  Academic Patenting in Europe: A Reassessment of Evidence and Research Practices , 2013 .

[8]  魏屹东,et al.  Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[9]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  'Names Game': Harnessing Inventors Patent Data for Economic Research , 2006 .

[10]  Martin Hummel,et al.  University Patenting in Germany before and after 2002: What Role Did the Professors' Privilege Play? , 2009 .

[11]  Katrin Hussinger,et al.  The nexus between science and industry: evidence from faculty inventions , 2012 .

[12]  G. Buenstorf,et al.  When Do Universities Own Their Patents? An Explorative Study of Patent Characteristics and Organizational Determinants in Germany , 2013 .

[13]  Julio Raffo,et al.  How to play the “Names Game”: Patent retrieval comparing different heuristics , 2009 .

[14]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights Have Profited from Comments and Suggestions , 2002 .

[15]  W. Glänzel,et al.  Patent and Publication Activities of German Professors: An Empirical Assessment of Their Co-Activity , 2007 .

[16]  Francesco Lissoni,et al.  The Keins Database on Academic Inventors: Methodology and Contents , 2006 .

[17]  Gaétan de Rassenfosse,et al.  Selection Bias in Innovation Studies: A Simple Test , 2011 .

[18]  Marco Sabbadin Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D , 2016 .

[19]  A. Geuna,et al.  University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence , 2006 .

[20]  Francesco Lissoni,et al.  Academic patenting and the professor's privilege: evidence on Denmark from the KEINS database , 2009 .