Assessment of the dose distribution inside a cardiac cath lab using TLD measurements and Monte Carlo simulations

Abstract Over the last decade, there was a substantial increase in the number of interventional cardiology procedures worldwide, and the corresponding ionizing radiation doses for both the medical staff and patients became a subject of concern. Interventional procedures in cardiology are normally very complex, resulting in long exposure times. Also, these interventions require the operator to work near the patient and, consequently, close to the primary X-ray beam. Moreover, due to the scattered radiation from the patient and the equipment, the medical staff is also exposed to a non-uniform radiation field that can lead to a significant exposure of sensitive body organs and tissues, such as the eye lens, the thyroid and the extremities. In order to better understand the spatial variation of the dose and dose rate distributions during an interventional cardiology procedure, the dose distribution around a C-arm fluoroscopic system, in operation in a cardiac cath lab at Portuguese Hospital, was estimated using both Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and dosimetric measurements. To model and simulate the cardiac cath lab, including the fluoroscopic equipment used to execute interventional procedures, the state-of-the-art MC radiation transport code MCNPX 2.7.0 was used. Subsequently, Thermo-Luminescent Detector (TLD) measurements were performed, in order to validate and support the simulation results obtained for the cath lab model. The preliminary results presented in this study reveal that the cardiac cath lab model was successfully validated, taking into account the good agreement between MC calculations and TLD measurements. The simulated results for the isodose curves related to the C-arm fluoroscopic system are also consistent with the dosimetric information provided by the equipment manufacturer (Siemens). The adequacy of the implemented computational model used to simulate complex procedures and map dose distributions around the operator and the medical staff is discussed, in view of the optimization principle (and the associated ALARA objective), one of the pillars of the international system of radiological protection.

[1]  A. Kovács,et al.  Dose measurements for characterization of a semi-industrial cobalt-60 gamma-irradiation facility , 2006 .

[2]  D. J. Brenner Conversion Coefficients for Use in Radiological Protection against External Radiation , 1999 .

[3]  A Kosunen,et al.  Monte Carlo simulations of occupational radiation doses in interventional radiology. , 2007, The British journal of radiology.

[4]  P. Ferrari,et al.  Monte Carlo calculations on extremity and eye lens dosimetry for medical staff at interventional radiology procedures. , 2011, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[5]  A. Bozkurt,et al.  Simultaneous determination of equivalent dose to organs and tissues of the patient and of the physician in interventional radiology using the Monte Carlo method , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  J. Geleijns,et al.  Monte Carlo calculations for assessment of radiation dose to patients with congenital heart defects and to staff during cardiac catheterizations. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[7]  S. Evans Catalogue of Diagnostic X-Ray Spectra and Other Data , 1998 .

[8]  Lara Struelens,et al.  Study of the parameters affecting operator doses in interventional radiology using Monte Carlo simulations , 2011 .

[9]  P. Ferrari,et al.  Evaluation of the dose to the patient and medical staff in interventional cardiology employing computational models. , 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[10]  Beth A Schueler Operator shielding: how and why. , 2010, Techniques in vascular and interventional radiology.

[11]  A. Calado,et al.  Energy and angular dependence of the personal dosemeter in use at ITN-DPRSN , 2008 .

[12]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Comparative assessment of different computational models for generation of X-ray spectra in diagnostic radiology and mammography , 2005, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..