Determining the optimal pumping duration of transient pumping tests for estimating hydraulic properties of leaky aquifers using global curve-fitting method: a simulation approach

Global curve-fitting method (GCFM) is regarded as an effective approach in hydrogeological parameter estimation, as it integrates and uses pumping data and water recovery data of a transient pumping test for parameter estimation. The impacts of pumping duration on hydrogeological parameter estimation by GCFM were investigated in the present study using 2 in situ pumping tests and 24 simulated transient pumping tests. Empirical formulas for determining the optimal pumping duration were derived. The study results suggest that pumping duration will have impacts on the accuracy of hydrogeological parameter estimation. When pumping duration is longer than a certain period, relative errors of hydrogeological parameter estimation keep relatively stable within an acceptable limit. Therefore, it is unnecessary to continue the pumping for a very long time after the groundwater level has become stable. When the change rate of drawdown over time (γ) in an observation well located within a distance of 100 m to the pumping well reaches 0.134, the pumping can be stopped. If there are more than one observation wells in a pumping test, the smallest γ value should be selected to determine the optimal pumping duration. This research is meaningful in the instruction of pumping tests, and will reduce test costs greatly.

[1]  Eungyu Park,et al.  Hydraulics of a finite-diameter horizontal well with wellbore storage and skin effect , 2002 .

[2]  M. Nastev,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Regional Rock Aquifers, South-Western Quebec, Canada , 2006 .

[3]  Peiyue Li,et al.  Global curve-fitting for determining the hydrogeological parameters of leaky confined aquifers by transient flow pumping test , 2013, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.

[4]  P. Bobeck,et al.  Henry Darcy and the Public Fountains of the City of Dijon , 2003 .

[5]  Ralph C. Heath,et al.  Ground-water regions of the United States , 1984 .

[6]  D. Neufeld.  An ecosystem approach to planning for groundwater: The case of Waterloo Region, Ontario, Canada , 2000 .

[7]  C. E. Jacob,et al.  Non-steady radial flow in an infinite leaky aquifer , 1955 .

[8]  S. Singh.  Diagnostic Curve for Confined Aquifer Parameters from Early Drawdowns , 2008 .

[9]  T. A. Prickett,et al.  Radial Flow in an Infinite Aquifer Undergoing Conversion from Artesian to Water Table Conditions , 1972 .

[10]  Sushil K. Singh.  Identifying Head Loss from Early Drawdowns , 2008 .

[11]  E. A. Sammel.  Aquifer Tests in Large‐Diameter Wells in Indiaa , 1974 .

[12]  J. Qiu.  China faces up to groundwater crisis , 2010, Nature.

[13]  Shih-Hsin Chen,et al.  Performance and analysis of pumping tests in a gravel formation , 2010 .

[14]  Guanhua Huang,et al.  Constant-head test in a leaky aquifer with a finite-thickness skin , 2011 .

[15]  A. Berg.  Determining aquifer coefficients from residual drawdown data , 1975 .

[16]  F. Steenbergen.  Promoting local management in groundwater , 2006 .

[17]  H. Yeh.  STEP-DRAWDOWN DATA-ANALYSIS , 1989 .

[18]  V. K. Choubey,et al.  Groundwater Pollution: An Overview , 2010 .

[19]  C. V. Theis.  The relation between the lowering of the Piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground‐water storage , 1935 .

[20]  H. Yeh,et al.  Transient Flow into a Partially Penetrating Well during the Constant-Head Test in Unconfined Aquifers , 2011 .

[21]  Todd C. Rasmussen,et al.  Estimating aquifer hydraulic properties using sinusoidal pumping at the Savannah River site, South Carolina, USA , 2003 .