"I want to be different from others in cyberspace" The role of visual similarity in virtual group identity

The present study investigated the impact of the visual similarity shared among virtual group members on group identity and conformity. In achieving this goal, the current study distinguished the similarity coming from being in the same experimental group (i.e., transient group membership) and the similarity coming from the same social group membership (i.e., lasting group membership), in response to the critique that these two group memberships have not been set apart in previous computer-mediated group research. The current study also attended to the fact that previous research on computer-mediated groups restricted personality traits that might have affected group identity formation and conformity in virtual groups. In response to this constraint, the present study included participants' needs to be different from others (NFU) and needs for inclusion (ISC) to a hypothesized path model that was founded on the SIDE model. Furthermore, the author examined whether the same hypothesized path model could uphold across the differentiated levels of similarity shared among group members.

[1]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Social identity, normative content, and "deindividuation" in computer-mediated groups , 1999 .

[2]  Dominic Abrams,et al.  Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives. , 1993 .

[3]  C. Maslach,et al.  Social and personal bases of individuation. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  C. R. Snyder,et al.  Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. , 1977 .

[5]  S. Reicher,et al.  The InSIDE story: Social psychological processes affecting on-line groups. , 2000 .

[6]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[7]  Steve Hinkle,et al.  The Social Identity Perspective , 2004 .

[8]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Interdisciplinary Theoretical Perspectives of Small Groups Part II , 2004 .

[9]  Jolanda Jetten,et al.  Reconciling individuality and the group , 2006 .

[10]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[11]  Eun-Ju Lee.  Effects of Visual Representation on Social Influence in Computer-Mediated Communication: Experimental Tests of the Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Effects. , 2004 .

[12]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  The internet and social life. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[13]  C. R. Snyder,et al.  Product Scarcity by Need for Uniqueness Interaction: A Consumer Catch-22 Carousel? , 1992 .

[14]  S. Asch.  Effects of Group Pressure Upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments , 1951 .

[15]  George Cheney,et al.  On the various and changing meanings of organizational membership: A field study of organizational identification , 1983 .

[16]  P. Zimbardo.  The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. , 1969 .

[17]  H. Tajfel.  Social identity and intergroup relations , 1985 .

[18]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Transformed Facial Similarity as a Political Cue: A Preliminary Investigation , 2006 .

[19]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  Social Identity: Context, Commitment, Content , 1999 .

[20]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[21]  Joel Cooper,et al.  Opinion divergence as a strategy to avoid being miscast. , 1969 .

[22]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Social influence in computer-mediated groups , 1997 .

[23]  H. Fromkin.  Effects of experimentally aroused feelings of undistinctiveness upon valuation of scarce and novel experiences. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  E. Fromm.  Escape to Freedom , 1941 .

[25]  Morton Deutsch,et al.  Theories in social psychology , 1966 .

[26]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[27]  H. Tajfel.  Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , 1982 .

[28]  Tom Postmes,et al.  When are net effects gross products? The power of influence and the influence of power in computer-mediated communication. , 2002 .

[29]  V. L. Allen.  Situational Factors In Conformity1 , 1965 .

[30]  Howard L. Fromkin,et al.  Uniqueness, the human pursuit of difference , 1980 .

[31]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[32]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[33]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[34]  Tom Postmes,et al.  SIDE issues centre stage: Recent developments in studies of de-individuation in groups. , 2000 .

[35]  Jolanda Jetten,et al.  Individuality and the Group: Advances in Social Identity , 2006 .

[36]  Glynis M. Breakwell,et al.  The Distinctiveness Principle: Identity, Meaning, and the Bounds of Cultural Relativity , 2000 .

[37]  T. Postmes,et al.  A Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Phenomena , 1995 .

[38]  John C. Turner,et al.  The social dimension: Social identification and psychological group formation , 1984 .

[39]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Experimental Tests of Normative Group Influence and Representation Effects in Computer-Mediated Communication: When Interacting Via Computers Differs from Interacting With Computers. , 2002 .

[40]  Russell Spears,et al.  Love at first byte? Building personal relationships over computer networks. , 1995 .

[41]  T. Postmes,et al.  Behavior Online: Does Anonymous Computer Communication Reduce Gender Inequality? , 2002 .

[42]  T. Singelis,et al.  The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals , 1994 .

[43]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[44]  H. Guetzkow,et al.  Groups, Leadership, and Men , 1952 .

[45]  A. Maslow.  Toward a Psychology of Being , 1962 .

[46]  H. Tajfel.  The Social Dimension: European Developments In Social Psychology , 1984 .

[47]  Eun-Ju Lee,et al.  Effects of the Influence Agent’s Sex and Self-Confidence on Informational Social Influence in Computer-Mediated Communication: , 2005, Commun. Res..