Automated quantification of myocardial infarction from MR images by accounting for partial volume effects: animal, phantom, and human study.

Ethics committees approved human and animal study components; informed written consent was provided (prospective human study [20 men; mean age, 62 years]) or waived (retrospective human study [16 men, four women; mean age, 59 years]). The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate a clinically applicable method, accounting for the partial volume effect, to automatically quantify myocardial infarction from delayed contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance images. Pixels were weighted according to signal intensity to calculate infarct fraction for each pixel. Mean bias +/- variability (or standard deviation), expressed as percentage left ventricular myocardium (%LVM), were -0.3 +/- 1.3 (animals), -1.2 +/- 1.7 (phantoms), and 0.3 +/- 2.7 (patients), respectively. Algorithm had lower variability than dichotomous approach (2.7 vs 7.7 %LVM, P < .01) and did not differ from interobserver variability for bias (P = .31) or variability (P = .38). The weighted approach provides automatic quantification of myocardial infarction with higher accuracy and lower variability than a dichotomous algorithm.

[1]  Richard D. White,et al.  Quantitative assessment of myocardial scar in delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  C. Higgins,et al.  Measurement of the distribution volume of gadopentetate dimeglumine at echo-planar MR imaging to quantify myocardial infarction: comparison with 99mTc-DTPA autoradiography in rats. , 1999, Radiology.

[3]  J. MacQueen Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations , 1967 .

[4]  Olga Bondarenko,et al.  Standardizing the definition of hyperenhancement in the quantitative assessment of infarct size and myocardial viability using delayed contrast-enhanced CMR. , 2005, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[5]  Dan W Rettmann,et al.  Accurate and Objective Infarct Sizing by Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Canine Myocardial Infarction Model , 2022 .

[6]  J. Engvall,et al.  Semi-automatic quantification of myocardial infarction from delayed contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging , 2005, Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ.

[7]  O. Simonetti,et al.  Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. , 1999, Circulation.

[8]  Richard D. White,et al.  Segmentation of non-viable myocardium in delayed enhancement magnetic resonance images , 2005, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[9]  Alessandro Pingitore,et al.  A fast and effective method to assess myocardial necrosis by means of contrast magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[10]  P. Kellman,et al.  Quantitative myocardial infarction on delayed enhancement MRI. Part I: Animal validation of an automated feature analysis and combined thresholding infarct sizing algorithm , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  O. Simonetti,et al.  The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  A. Jaffe,et al.  The quantification of infarct size. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  O. Simonetti,et al.  An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. , 2001, Radiology.

[14]  D. Revel,et al.  Quantitation of reperfused myocardial infarction by Gd-DOTA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. An experimental study. , 1991, Investigative radiology.

[15]  B. Brott,et al.  Percent infarct mapping: An R1‐map‐based CE‐MRI method for determining myocardial viability distribution , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  F. Buonanno,et al.  Quantification of Experimental Myocardial Infarction Using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Paramagnetic Ion Contrast Enhancement in ExcisedCanine Hearts , 1982, Circulation.

[17]  R. Judd,et al.  Physiological basis of myocardial contrast enhancement in fast magnetic resonance images of 2-day-old reperfused canine infarcts. , 1995, Circulation.

[18]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Quantification of myocardial infarct size and transmurality by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in men. , 2004, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  Olga Bondarenko,et al.  Delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of regional functional improvement after acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  Warren J Manning,et al.  Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report. , 2004, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[21]  R. Kim,et al.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardium at risk: distinction between reversible and irreversible injury throughout infarct healing. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  P. Kellman,et al.  Quantitative myocardial infarction on delayed enhancement MRI. Part II: Clinical application of an automated feature analysis and combined thresholding infarct sizing algorithm , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[23]  Anders Heyden,et al.  A fast algorithm for level set-like active contours , 2003, Pattern Recognit. Lett..