Establishment of the intelligent verification criteria for a routine urinalysis analyzer in a multi-center study

Abstract Background Although laboratory information system (LIS) is widely used nowadays, the results of routine urinalysis still need 100% manual verification. We established intelligent verification criteria to perform the automated verification process and reduce manual labor. Methods A total of 4610 urine specimens were obtained from the patients of three hospitals in Beijing, China. Firstly, 895 specimens were measured to establish the reference intervals of formed-element parameters in UF5000. Secondly, 2803 specimens were analyzed for setting up the intelligent verification criteria (including the microscopic review rules and manual verification rules). Lastly, 912 specimens were used to verify the efficacy and accuracy of the intelligent verification criteria. Phase-contrast microscopes were used for the microscopic review. Results Employing a results level corresponding relationship in specific parameters including hemoglobin (red blood cell [RBC]), leukocyte esterase (white blood cell [WBC]) and protein (cast) between the dry-chemistry analysis and formed-element analysis, as well as instrument flags, we established seven WBC verification rules, eight RBC verification rules and four cast verification rules. Based on the microscopy results, through analyzing the pre-set rules mentioned earlier, we finally determined seven microscopic review rules, nine manual verification rules and three auto-verification rules. The microscopic review rate was 21.98% (616/2803), the false-negative rate was 4.32% (121/2803), the total manual verification rate was 35.71% (1001/2803) and the auto-verification rate was 64.29% (1802/2803). The validation results were consistent. Conclusions The intelligent verification criteria for urinary dry-chemistry and urinary formed-element analysis can improve the efficiency of the results verification process and ensure the reliability of the test results.

[1]  Emilio Flores,et al.  Urinary albumin strip assay as a screening test to replace quantitative technology in certain conditions , 2018, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[2]  Jun-long Ma,et al.  Study and application of the combination of urine dry chemistry examination and urine sediment flow cytometry examination on the microscopic screening of the urine formed component , 2011 .

[3]  Paolo Brambilla,et al.  The development of autoverification rules applied to urinalysis performed on the AutionMAX-SediMAX platform. , 2018, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[4]  T Kouri,et al.  ISLH recommended reference procedure for the enumeration of particles in urine. , 2003, Laboratory hematology : official publication of the International Society for Laboratory Hematology.

[5]  Fan Yongli,et al.  Establishment and application of the autoverification system in laboratory clinical chemistry and immunology laboratory , 2018 .

[6]  Joris R. Delanghe,et al.  Quantitative urine test strip reading for leukocyte esterase and hemoglobin peroxidase , 2018, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[7]  Wei Cui,et al.  Development and clinical application of microscopy review criteria of automated urine chemistry and sedimental analysis , 2011 .

[8]  Marijn M Speeckaert,et al.  Sensitive albuminuria analysis using dye-binding based test strips. , 2017, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[9]  Wei Wu,et al.  Establishment and development of the personalized criteria for microscopic review following multiple automated routine urinalysis systems. , 2015, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[10]  Xiaobo Li,et al.  Establishment and application of autoverification procedure for clinical chemistry test results , 2018 .

[11]  Sabrina Buoro,et al.  Performance evaluation of the new fully automated urine particle analyser UF-5000 compared to the reference method of the Fuchs-Rosenthal chamber. , 2017, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[12]  P W Barnes,et al.  The international consensus group for hematology review: suggested criteria for action following automated CBC and WBC differential analysis. , 2005, Laboratory hematology : official publication of the International Society for Laboratory Hematology.