The need for an objective outcome measurement in spine surgery--the timed-up-and-go test.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] P. Anderson,et al. Comparison of dural repair techniques. , 2015, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.
[2] Timothy R. Darlington,et al. No difference in postoperative complications, pain, and functional outcomes up to 2 years after incidental durotomy in lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective, multi-institutional, propensity-matched analysis of 1,741 patients. , 2014, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.
[3] S. Rutherford,et al. Pilot study of perioperative accidental durotomy: does the period of postoperative bed rest reduce the incidence of complication? , 2013, British journal of neurosurgery.
[4] P. McMahon,et al. Incidental durotomy after spinal surgery: a prospective study in an academic institution. , 2012, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.
[5] J. Chapman,et al. Risk factors for unintended durotomy during spine surgery: a multivariate analysis. , 2012, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.
[6] Alexander R. Vaccaro,et al. Assessing the Outcomes of Spine Surgery Using Global Positioning Systems , 2011, Spine.
[7] R A Deyo,et al. Outcome Measures for Low Back Pain Research: A Proposal for Standardized Use , 1998, Spine.
[8] Diane Podsiadlo,et al. The Timed “Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons , 1991, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.