Continuously Improving Innovation Management through Enterprise Social Media

This multi-year case study describes how our organization employed enterprise social media technology to change how we elicit, manage, and evaluate the large number of proposals submitted to our in-house research and development program and how we have continued to adopt and modify a single innovation management platform to address the strategic business needs of the corporation. We redesigned the proposal competition process using a commercially available innovation management platform as a mechanism to encourage posting research ideas, commenting on them, and finding researchers with similar or complementary ideas. As measured by a survey administered in two successive years, once when we were using older technology and again after the enterprise innovation management platform was introduced, participants’ satisfaction level increased significantly under the new process. This article also provides and discusses participation data over a three-year period. With an increasing business need to reach out to broader audiences beyond the researcher participants, we added a precursor event to proposal solicitation and selection that enables consumers of the research to help shape the research program strategy and outcomes. This extension to the process using prediction markets garnered an encouraging level of participation in its first deployment. Besides describing the steps we took to adapt the technology and design and evaluate the new process, this paper offers observations for other organizations considering using enterprise innovation management software to continuously improve their ideation processes and broaden engagement across the organization.

[1]  Douglas Schuler,et al.  Participatory Design: Principles and Practices , 1993 .

[2]  O. Bjelland,et al.  An Inside View of IBM's 'Innovation Jam' , 2008 .

[3]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  What's your idea?: a case study of a grassroots innovation pipeline within a large software company , 2010, CHI.

[4]  G. Jouret Inside Cisco's Search for the Next Big Idea , 2009 .

[5]  Cathleen Wharton,et al.  Testing a walkthrough methodology for theory-based design of walk-up-and-use interfaces , 1990, CHI '90.

[6]  Hazel Kyrk : Resolving Social Conflicts: Selected Papers on Group Dynamics , 1948 .

[7]  Laurie E. Damianos,et al.  Evaluation of the uses and benefits of a social business platform , 2012, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[8]  Dafydd Gibbon,et al.  1 User’s guide , 1998 .

[9]  Carlos Angel Iglesias,et al.  Classifying and comparing community innovation in Idea Management Systems , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[10]  J.W.C.M. Cobbenhagen,et al.  Successful Innovation: Towards a New Theory for the Management of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises , 2000 .

[11]  D. Reider,et al.  Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System , 2012 .

[12]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[13]  Gregorio Convertino,et al.  Innovation cockpit: a dashboard for facilitators in idea management , 2012, CSCW.

[14]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[15]  Kate Ehrlich,et al.  Diversity among enterprise online communities: collaborating, teaming, and innovating through social media , 2012, CHI.