Arthroplastie de hanche métal-métal sans ciment versus céramique-polyéthylène chez des patients de moins de 50 ans avec un suivi de 20 à 22 ans : Avons-nous fait le bon choix en abandonnant le couple métal-métal de petit diamètre ?

[1]  J. Lerat,et al.  Metasul vs Cerasul bearings: a prospective, randomized study at a mean eighteen years , 2020, International Orthopaedics.

[2]  H. Migaud,et al.  Long-term comparative study of large-diameter metal-on-metal bearings: Resurfacing versus total arthroplasty with large-diameter Durom™ bearing. , 2019, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[3]  V. Nikolaou,et al.  Is Oxidized Zirconium Femoral Head Superior to Other Bearing Types in Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2019, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  Y.H. Kim,et al.  Prevalence and natural course of pseudotumours after small‐head metal‐on‐metal total hip arthroplasty: A MINIMUM 18‐YEAR FOLLOW‐UP STUDY OF A PREVIOUS REPORT , 2019, The bone & joint journal.

[5]  N. Ishiguro,et al.  Same survival but higher rate of osteolysis for metal-on-metal Ultamet versus ceramic-on-ceramic in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty after 8 years of follow-up. , 2018, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[6]  H. Zuiderbaan,et al.  Long-term clinical results of the Metasul metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: 12.6 years follow-up of 128 primary total hip replacements , 2018, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[7]  H. Migaud,et al.  Incidence of Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris From 28-mm Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasties With Minimum 10 Years of Follow-Up: Clinical, Laboratory, and Ultrasound Assessment of 44 Cases. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  A. Eskelinen,et al.  High prevalence of noise following Delta ceramic‐on‐ceramic total hip arthroplasty , 2017, The bone & joint journal.

[9]  Young-Hoo Kim,et al.  Long-Term Results of Third-Generation Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearing Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young Patients. , 2016, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[10]  É. Drumez,et al.  Is there any range-of-motion advantage to using bearings larger than 36mm in primary hip arthroplasty: A case-control study comparing 36-mm and large-diameter heads. , 2016, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[11]  H. Migaud,et al.  Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty With Metasul Bearings Provides Good Results in Active Young Patients: A Concise Followup , 2016, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  P. Boisrenoult,et al.  Small diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty at 13 years - a follow-up study. , 2015, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[13]  D. Zukor,et al.  Midterm Outcomes of the Recently FDA Approved Ceramic on Ceramic Bearing in Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients Under 65 Years of Age. , 2015, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  P. Tran,et al.  Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty: A Review of Adverse Reactions and Patient Management , 2015, Journal of functional biomaterials.

[15]  R. Windhager,et al.  Primary cementless total hip arthroplasty with second-generation metal-on-metal bearings: a concise follow-up, at a minimum of seventeen years, of a previous report. , 2014, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  J. Kretzer,et al.  Minimum ten-year results of a 28-mm metal-on-metal bearing in cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients fifty years of age and younger , 2014, International Orthopaedics.

[17]  J. Lerat,et al.  Metasul vs Cerasul bearings: a prospective, randomized study at 9 years. , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[18]  F. Randelli,et al.  Cementless Metasul metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties at 13 years. , 2012, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[19]  H. Migaud,et al.  Cementless metal-on-metal versus ceramic-on-polyethylene hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years of age: a comparative study with twelve to fourteen-year follow-up. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[20]  S. Bulstra,et al.  No superiority of cemented metal-on-metal over metal-on-polyethylene THA in a randomized controlled trial at 10-year follow-up. , 2010, Orthopedics.

[21]  B. Jolles,et al.  Cross-cultural adaptations of the Oxford-12 HIP score to the French speaking population. , 2009, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[22]  W. Walter,et al.  Osteolysis with a cementless second generation metal-on-metal cup in total hip replacement , 2009, International Orthopaedics.

[23]  Christophe Chantelot,et al.  Cementless metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty in patients less than 50 years of age: comparison with a matched control group using ceramic-on-polyethylene after a minimum 5-year follow-up. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[24]  P. Devane,et al.  Three-dimensional polyethylene wear of a press-fit titanium prosthesis. Factors influencing generation of polyethylene debris. , 1997, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[25]  C. Engh,et al.  Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[26]  R. Merle d'Aubigné.  [Numerical classification of the function of the hip. 1970]. , 1990, Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur.

[27]  C. Engh,et al.  Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[28]  H. Amstutz,et al.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. , 1979, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[29]  J. Charnley,et al.  Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. , 1976, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[30]  L. Riley,et al.  Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. , 1973, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[31]  W. Harris,et al.  Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. , 1969, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[32]  J. Charnley.  Total prosthetic replacement of the hip. , 1968, Triangle; the Sandoz journal of medical science.