Dynamic evolution of collaborative networks: evidence from nano-energy research in China

In organizations, knowledge creation activities are embedded in collaborative networks and are influenced by their partners. Therefore, we examine how entire networks change over time in this study, as well as the reasoning behind the structures of ego networks based on unique scientific research discoveries published in the emerging cross-disciplinary field of nano-energy. These data were extracted from Science Citation Index Expanded. Specifically, we mainly focus on two dimensions of ego network changes: network growth and diversity. Results demonstrate the recent remarkable growth of inter-organizational collaborative networks in the nano-energy field and empirically prove that the subsequent growth and diversity of ego networks are caused by three coexisting driving forces (collaborative capacity, network status position and cohesion) that act collectively. Our study is conducted at the organizational level because we investigate the universities, research institutes and firms that participate in nano-energy scientific research and the collaborative networks formed through co-authorships among these institutions in knowledge creation processes. Moreover, our study has significant implications for the scientific research conducted by organizations in developing countries and emerging fields.

[1]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: an updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs , 2013, Scientometrics.

[2]  Michael C. Connelly,et al.  U. S. energy production activity and innovation , 2012 .

[3]  Andreas Pyka,et al.  The evolution of innovation networks: The case of a German automotive network , 2013 .

[4]  魏屹东,et al.  Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[5]  Isabelle Bouty Interpersonal and Interaction Influences on Informal Resource Exchanges Between R&D Researchers Across Organizational Boundaries , 2000 .

[6]  Yutao Sun,et al.  Measuring international trade-related technology spillover: a composite approach of network analysis and information theory , 2012, Scientometrics.

[7]  Toby E. Stuart Network Positions and Propensities to Collaborate: An Investigation of Strategic Alliance Formation in a High-Technology Industry , 1998 .

[8]  Jonathan J. H. Zhu,et al.  Homophily versus preferential attachment: Evolutionary mechanisms of scientific collaboration networks , 2014 .

[9]  Richard Makadok Toward a synthesis of the resource‐based and dynamic‐capability views of rent creation , 2001 .

[10]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Investigating the Microstructure of Network Evolution: Alliance Formation in the Mobile Communications Industry , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[11]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[12]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Centrality and network flow , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[13]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Network science: Luck or reason , 2012, Nature.

[14]  Gino Cattani,et al.  A Core/Periphery Perspective on Individual Creative Performance: Social Networks and Cinematic Achievements in the Hollywood Film Industry , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[15]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  The effects of firm reputation and status on interorganizational network structure , 2013 .

[16]  David Obstfeld Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation , 2005 .

[17]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[18]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  The Rise and Fall of Small Worlds: Exploring the Dynamics of Social Structure , 2013 .

[19]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  Sungjoo Lee,et al.  Modeling and analyzing technology innovation in the energy sector: Patent-based HMM approach , 2012, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[21]  Guillermo Armando Ronda-Pupo,et al.  Dynamics of the scientific community network within the strategic management field through the Strategic Management Journal 1980–2009: the role of cooperation , 2010, Scientometrics.

[22]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Testing Multitheoretical, Multilevel Hypotheses About Organizational Networks: An Analytic Framework and Empirical Example , 2006 .

[23]  Ana Menéndez-Manjón,et al.  Nano-energy research trends: bibliometrical analysis of nanotechnology research in the energy sector , 2011 .

[24]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[25]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[26]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[27]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  The mathematical theory of communication , 1950 .

[28]  Nachoem M. Wijnberg,et al.  Disentangling the effects of reputation and network position on the evolution of alliance networks , 2010 .

[29]  Michele Grimaldi,et al.  Knowledge-based inter-organizational collaborations , 2010, J. Knowl. Manag..

[30]  David Knoke,et al.  Organizational status growth and structure: An alliance network analysis , 2013, Soc. Networks.

[31]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  The impact of university–industry collaboration networks on innovation in nanobiopharmaceuticals , 2013 .

[32]  Manuel E. Sosa Where Do Creative Interactions Come From? The Role of Tie Content and Social Networks , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[33]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  The impact of network embeddedness on research output , 2013 .

[34]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[35]  Ralph A. Heidl,et al.  Knowledge, Networks, and Knowledge Networks , 2011 .

[36]  Albert A. Cannella,et al.  Changing the Exchange , 2016 .

[37]  Joel Podolny Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[38]  Sleeboom-Faulkner Chinese Academy of Social Sciences , 2006, B-Model Gromov-Witten Theory.

[39]  R. Gulati,et al.  Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[40]  Ricky Leung,et al.  Networks as sponges: International collaboration for developing nanomedicine in China , 2013 .

[41]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  The Genesis and Dynamics of Organizational Networks , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[42]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  Network Evolution: The Origins of Structural Holes , 2009 .

[43]  Greg Tegart,et al.  Energy and nanotechnologies: Priority areas for Australia's future , 2009 .

[44]  Eldon Y. Li,et al.  Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective , 2013 .

[45]  Nan Ma,et al.  An exploratory study on collaboration profiles of Chinese publications in Molecular Biology , 2005, Scientometrics.

[46]  J. Gans,et al.  Credit History: The Changing Nature of Scientific Credit , 2013 .

[47]  P. Bonacich Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[48]  John E. Prescott,et al.  The Evolution of Interfirm Networks: Environmental Effects on Patterns of Network Change , 2006 .

[49]  Myung S. Jhon,et al.  Nanotechnology policy in Korea for sustainable growth , 2012, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[50]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  Measuring scientific research in emerging nano-energy field , 2014, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[51]  Dean A. Shepherd,et al.  The importance of the first relationship: The ongoing influence of initial network on future status , 2013 .

[52]  N. Eagle,et al.  Network Diversity and Economic Development , 2010, Science.

[53]  Sungjoo Lee,et al.  Patterns of technological innovation and evolution in the energy sector: A patent-based approach , 2013 .

[54]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  THE EFFECT OF ALLIANCE NETWORK DIVERSITY ON MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISE PERFORMANCE , 2005 .

[55]  Irem Demirkan,et al.  Exploring the Role of Network Characteristics, Knowledge Quality, and Inertia on the Evolution of Scientific Networks , 2013 .

[56]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[57]  M. Diallo,et al.  Nanotechnology and clean energy: sustainable utilization and supply of critical materials , 2013, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[58]  Michael Jensen,et al.  Staging Exchange Partner Choices: When Do Status and Reputation Matter? , 2008 .

[59]  Joel Podolny Status Signals: A Sociological Study of Market Competition , 2005 .

[60]  Peter T. Cummings,et al.  Nanoscience Research for Energy Needs , 2005 .

[61]  W. Broad The publishing game: getting more for less. , 1981, Science.

[62]  Timothy S. Simcoe,et al.  Status, Quality and Attention: What’s in a (Missing) Name? ∗ , 2010 .

[63]  Chiara Franzoni,et al.  Aggregates, Bridges or Isolates? Investigating the Social Networks of Academic Inventors , 2013 .

[64]  A. Valle,et al.  Diffusion of nuclear energy in some developing countries , 2014 .

[65]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Network Theory , 2013 .

[66]  Jeongsik Jay Lee,et al.  Heterogeneity, Brokerage and Innovative Performance: Endogenous Formation of Collaborative Inventor Networks , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[67]  David M Levinson,et al.  Measuring the Structure of Road Networks , 2007 .