Assessment of homologous recombination deficiency phenotype in breast cancers in adolescents and young adults in the clinical setting

Background Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), which may be associated with high efficacy of PARP inhibitor- and platinum agent-based therapies, is a prevalent phenotype of breast cancer diagnosed in adolescents and young adults (AYAs; 15–39 years old). HRD score, indicating HRD status, is not routinely assessed in the oncology clinic due to the need for genome-wide analyses. Methods Subjects were a Japanese cohort of 46 AYA breast cancer patients, whose HRD scores were calculated from whole-exome sequencing data, and two existing breast cancer cohorts (US and European) for which HRD scores were available. Genetic and clinicopathological factors associated with the HRD-high phenotype, defined as HRD score ≥42, were selected based on the criterion that they be assessible by routine examinations qualifying for insurance reimbursement. A model for prediction of the HRD-high phenotype was constructed and validated using data from the three cohorts. Results In the Japanese AYA cohort, as in the US and European cohorts, HRD-high phenotype (13/46, 28.3%) was preferentially observed in cases with any or combination of germline BRCA1/2 mutations, somatic TP53 mutations, triple-negative subtype, and higher tumor grades. Because these four factors can be assessed by routine examination that qualifies for insurance reimbursement, we developed a model based on these factors to judge whether a case is HRD-high, using the US cohort (n = 744; Area under the curve [AUC] = 0.85). The predictive power of the model was validated in the Japanese (n = 46; AUC = 0.90) and European (n = 58; AUC = 0.96) AYA cases. A model developed using the European cohort (n = 477; AUC = 0.89) had similar predictive power in Japanese (AUC = 0.89) and US (n = 54; AUC = 0.87) AYA cohorts. Conclusions The HRD-high phenotype of AYA breast cancer can be deduced based on genomic and pathological factors that are routinely examined in the oncology clinic. The predictive model presented here could increase the fraction of AYA breast cancer patients who could benefit from PARP inhibitor­- and platinum agent-based therapies.

[1]  C. Gong,et al.  Effect of younger age on survival outcomes in T1N0M0 breast cancer: A propensity score matching analysis , 2019, Journal of surgical oncology.

[2]  H. Rugo,et al.  Alpelisib for PIK3CA‐Mutated, Hormone Receptor–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Y. Kamatani,et al.  Germline pathogenic variants of 11 breast cancer genes in 7,051 Japanese patients and 11,241 controls , 2018, Nature Communications.

[4]  W. Eiermann,et al.  Talazoparib in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer and a Germline BRCA Mutation , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Nicolai J. Birkbak,et al.  Migrating the SNP array-based homologous recombination deficiency measures to next generation sequencing data of breast cancer , 2018, npj Breast Cancer.

[6]  X. Mu,et al.  Multi-omics profiling of younger Asian breast cancers reveals distinctive molecular signatures , 2018, Nature Communications.

[7]  A. Ashworth,et al.  Carboplatin in BRCA1/2-mutated and triple-negative breast cancer BRCAness subgroups: the TNT Trial , 2018, Nature Medicine.

[8]  Hyun Cheol Chung,et al.  Landscape of Actionable Genetic Alterations Profiled from 1,071 Tumor Samples in Korean Cancer Patients , 2018, Cancer research and treatment : official journal of Korean Cancer Association.

[9]  Adrian V. Lee,et al.  An Integrated TCGA Pan-Cancer Clinical Data Resource to Drive High-Quality Survival Outcome Analytics , 2018, Cell.

[10]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Pathogenic Germline Variants in 10,389 Adult Cancers. , 2018, Cell.

[11]  Michael T. Zimmermann,et al.  Genomic and Molecular Landscape of DNA Damage Repair Deficiency across The Cancer Genome Atlas , 2018, Cell reports.

[12]  T. Kohno Implementation of “clinical sequencing” in cancer genome medicine in Japan , 2018, Cancer science.

[13]  A. Okamoto,et al.  Gene aberration profile of tumors of adolescent and young adult females , 2017, Oncotarget.

[14]  E. Lander,et al.  A mutational signature reveals alterations underlying deficient homologous recombination repair in breast cancer , 2017, Nature Genetics.

[15]  A. Tinker,et al.  Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Breast Cancer: A Clinical Review. , 2017, JCO precision oncology.

[16]  M. Robson,et al.  Olaparib for Metastatic Breast Cancer in Patients with a Germline BRCA Mutation , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Gayle Patel,et al.  A study of over 35,000 women with breast cancer tested with a 25‐gene panel of hereditary cancer genes , 2017, Cancer.

[18]  Donavan T. Cheng,et al.  Mutational Landscape of Metastatic Cancer Revealed from Prospective Clinical Sequencing of 10,000 Patients , 2017, Nature Medicine.

[19]  E. Birney,et al.  HRDetect is a predictor of BRCA1 and BRCA2 deficiency based on mutational signatures , 2017, Nature Medicine.

[20]  Alan Ashworth,et al.  PARP inhibitors: Synthetic lethality in the clinic , 2017, Science.

[21]  B. Monk,et al.  Niraparib Maintenance Therapy in Platinum-Sensitive, Recurrent Ovarian Cancer , 2017 .

[22]  D. Matei,et al.  Overall survival in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent serous ovarian cancer receiving olaparib maintenance monotherapy: an updated analysis from a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 2 trial. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[23]  Rulla M Tamimi,et al.  Subtype-Dependent Relationship Between Young Age at Diagnosis and Breast Cancer Survival. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  E. Winer,et al.  Frequency of Germline Mutations in 25 Cancer Susceptibility Genes in a Sequential Series of Patients With Breast Cancer. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  Dmitriy Sonkin,et al.  TP53 Variations in Human Cancers: New Lessons from the IARC TP53 Database and Genomics Data , 2016, Human mutation.

[26]  David C. Jones,et al.  Landscape of somatic mutations in 560 breast cancer whole genome sequences , 2016, Nature.

[27]  Z. Szallasi,et al.  Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) Score Predicts Response to Platinum-Containing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[28]  Emma L. Jenkins,et al.  Tumors with AKT1E17K Mutations Are Rational Targets for Single Agent or Combination Therapy with AKT Inhibitors , 2015, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[29]  Theresa Zhang,et al.  Personalized genomic analyses for cancer mutation discovery and interpretation , 2015, Science Translational Medicine.

[30]  James M Ford,et al.  Phase II Study of Gemcitabine, Carboplatin, and Iniparib As Neoadjuvant Therapy for Triple-Negative and BRCA1/2 Mutation-Associated Breast Cancer With Assessment of a Tumor-Based Measure of Genomic Instability: PrECOG 0105. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  T. Shien,et al.  Breast cancer in young women : Issues and perspectives regarding patients ’ and survivors ’ care Clinicopathological features of young patients ( < 35 years of age ) with breast cancer in a Japanese Breast Cancer Society supported study , 2014 .

[32]  D. Matei,et al.  Olaparib maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed serous ovarian cancer: a preplanned retrospective analysis of outcomes by BRCA status in a randomised phase 2 trial. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[33]  Sheena M. Scroggins,et al.  Germline and Somatic Mutations in Homologous Recombination Genes Predict Platinum Response and Survival in Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneal Carcinomas , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[34]  A. Kurian,et al.  Occurrence of breast cancer subtypes in adolescent and young adult women , 2012, Breast Cancer Research.

[35]  Lee T. Sam,et al.  Personalized Oncology Through Integrative High-Throughput Sequencing: A Pilot Study , 2011, Science Translational Medicine.

[36]  H. Mackay,et al.  Olaparib in patients with recurrent high-grade serous or poorly differentiated ovarian carcinoma or triple-negative breast cancer: a phase 2, multicentre, open-label, non-randomised study. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[37]  C. Perou,et al.  Allele-specific copy number analysis of tumors , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  K. Hess,et al.  Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[39]  W. Han,et al.  Poor outcome of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer at very young age is due to tamoxifen resistance: nationwide survival data in Korea--a report from the Korean Breast Cancer Society. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[40]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. , 2002, Histopathology.

[41]  Anne Floquet,et al.  Rucaparib in relapsed, platinum-sensitive high-grade ovarian carcinoma (ARIEL2 Part 1): an international, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[42]  J. Thigpen Olaparib Maintenance Therapy in Platinum-Sensitive Relapsed Ovarian Cancer , 2012 .