Soil and informatics science combine to develop S-map: A new generation soil information system for New Zealand

Abstract Upgrading from a traditional soil spatial database, consisting of a single GIS layer of polygons and basic attributes, to a modern soil information system has required significant informatics resourcing. This paper describes the design criteria of New Zealand's new soil mapping system, and the IT infrastructure required for its support. The hybrid design incorporates both traditional soil survey techniques and data, and newer digital soil mapping techniques and information, to (eventually) achieve full coverage of New Zealand at 1:50 000 scale. Full advantage has been taken of recent advances in informatics science in the area of integrated database tools, modelling, remote sensing and web technologies. A number of in-house modules have been developed for functionality including: 1. Data entry, storage and validation of soil data and photos 2. Dynamic generation of spatial data, maps and factsheets highly customised for a range of end-users 3. Automated generation of relevant metadata reports 4. Running pedo-transfer functions (PTFs) and other digital soil mapping operations 5. Managing and simulating soil uncertainty information

[1]  B. Engelen,et al.  A world soils and terrain digital database (SOTER) — An improved assessment of land resources , 1993 .

[2]  Philippe Lagacherie,et al.  Digital soil mapping : an introductory perspective , 2007 .

[3]  H. Di,et al.  Variation in soil physical properties between and within morphologically defined series taxonomic units , 1989 .

[4]  Alfred E. Hartemink,et al.  Digital soil mapping: bridging research, environmental application, and operation , 2010 .

[5]  T. Webb,et al.  Quantifying variability of soil physical properties within soil series to address modern land-use issues on the Canterbury Plains, New Zealand , 2000 .

[6]  A. Hewitt.  New Zealand soil classification. , 1993 .

[7]  Allan Hewitt,et al.  Soilscapes Basis for Digital Soil Mapping in New Zealand , 2010 .

[8]  Gary A. Peterson,et al.  Soil Attribute Prediction Using Terrain Analysis , 1993 .

[9]  Philippe Lagacherie,et al.  Chapter 1 Spatial Soil Information Systems and Spatial Soil Inference Systems: Perspectives for Digital Soil Mapping , 2006 .

[10]  T. Webb.  Identification of functional horizons to predict physical properties for soils from alluvium in Canterbury, New Zealand , 2003 .

[11]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  From pedotransfer functions to soil inference systems , 2002 .

[12]  A. Hewitt,et al.  National Mapping of Landform Elements in Support of S-Map, A New Zealand Soils Database , 2008 .

[13]  Gerard B. M. Heuvelink,et al.  Uncertainty and stochastic sensitivity analysis of the GeoPEARL pesticide leaching model , 2010 .

[14]  T. Mayr,et al.  Aligning New Zealand digital soil mapping with the global soil mapping project , 2010 .

[15]  J. Beek,et al.  Developments in Soil Science , 2019, Global Change and Forest Soils.

[16]  Alfred E. Hartemink,et al.  Digital Soil Mapping with Limited Data , 2008 .

[17]  P. L. Singleton,et al.  Soil Description Handbook , 1995 .

[18]  B. Minasny,et al.  Digital Soil Map of the World , 2009, Science.

[19]  Chris Moran,et al.  ASRIS: the database , 2003 .

[20]  Neil McKenzie,et al.  Online Soil Information Systems – Recent Australian Experience , 2008 .

[21]  J. Adams,et al.  Variability within a soil mapping unit mapped at the soil type level in the Wanganui district , 1976 .

[22]  Jochen Schmidt,et al.  Fuzzy land element classification from DTMs based on geometry and terrain position , 2004 .

[23]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  On digital soil mapping , 2003 .

[24]  P.F.M. van Gaans,et al.  Continuous classification in soil survey: spatial correlation, confusion and boundaries , 1997 .