Performance Analysis of STDMA and RA-TDMA Wireless Protocols in Industrial Scenarios

Industrial applications in the industry 4.0 scope present significant requirements and challenges from the communication technologies perspective: low latency, reliability, and determinism. However, some use cases add requirements on mobility, scalability and openness, such as flexible and large automated warehouses and production lines. Combining these two kinds of requirements calls for wireless technologies that can provide an adequate trade-off. This paper compares two protocols that rate particularly well in such trade-off, namely Self-Organizing Time Division Multiple Access (STDMA) and Reconfigurable and Adaptive Time Division Multiple Access (RATDMA). The comparison was carried out through simulations under a multipath dispersed time-variant industrial channel while subject to a variable Doppler shift. To this end, we used OMNeT++ in combination with the VEINS framework to evaluate several relevant metrics such as packet losses and packet inter-arrival time. Overall, RA-TDMA shows longer disconnections caused by the hand-over between separate networks. Concerning packet losses, the protocols perform similarly, with RA-TDMA outperforming STDMA under overlapping networks or poor clock synchronization.

[1]  Rüdiger Kays,et al.  Measurements for the development of an enhanced model for wireless channels in industrial environments , 2017, 2017 IEEE 13th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob).

[2]  Gerhard Fohler,et al.  Performance indicators and use case analysis for wireless networks in factory automation , 2017, 2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA).

[3]  Gerhard P. Hancke,et al.  Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks: Challenges, Design Principles, and Technical Approaches , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[4]  Daniel Mossé,et al.  A Clockless Synchronisation Framework for Cooperating Mobile Robots , 2018, 2018 IEEE Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium (RTAS).

[5]  Frederico Santos,et al.  Empirical Performance Models of MAC Protocols for Cooperative Platooning Applications , 2019 .

[6]  Mikel Mendicute,et al.  Analysis and Evaluation of Self-Organizing TDMA for Industrial Applications , 2019, 2019 15th IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS).

[7]  Luís Seabra Lopes,et al.  Self-configuration of an adaptive TDMA wireless communication protocol for teams of mobile robots , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation.

[8]  Stylianos Papanastasiou,et al.  In-depth analysis and evaluation of Self-organizing TDMA , 2013, 2013 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference.

[9]  Andreas Mitschele-Thiel,et al.  Latency Critical IoT Applications in 5G: Perspective on the Design of Radio Interface and Network Architecture , 2017, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[10]  Zhibo Pang,et al.  High-Performance Wireless Networks for Industrial Control Applications: New Targets and Feasibility , 2019, Proceedings of the IEEE.