The Performance of Incumbent firms in the Face of Radical Technological Innovation

A persistent theme in the academic literature on technological innovation is that incumbent enterprises have great difficulty crossing the abyss created by a radical technological innovation and, thus, go into decline, while new entrants rise to market dominance by exploiting the new technology. However, this tendency is not universal. There are outliers in any population, and much can be learned from examining this group. Here we identify a number of factors that help to explain incumbent performance in markets shaken by a radical technological innovation.

[1]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[2]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  The Theory of Economic Development , 2017 .

[3]  K. Popper,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1960 .

[4]  J. Schumpeter.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[5]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[6]  M. Kendall,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery. , 1959 .

[7]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[8]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[9]  E. Johnsen.  Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[10]  K. Arrow.  The limits of organization , 1974 .

[11]  C. Freeman.  Economics of Industrial Innovation , 1975 .

[12]  D. Schendel,et al.  Strategic responses to technological threats , 1976 .

[13]  K. Weick.  Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems , 1976, Gestión y Estrategia.

[14]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[15]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[16]  L. Bourgeois.  On the Measurement of Organizational Slack , 1981 .

[17]  Jennifer F. Reinganum.  Uncertain Innovation and the Persistence of Monopoly , 1982 .

[18]  D. Newbery,et al.  Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly , 1982 .

[19]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[20]  Robert A. Burgelman.  A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing in the Diversified Major Firm , 1983 .

[21]  Jennifer F. Reinganum.  Uncertain Innovation and the Persistence of Monopoly: Reply , 1984 .

[22]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[23]  M. Porter.  Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[24]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Strategy Formation in an Adhocracy. , 1985 .

[25]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[26]  R. V. Wyk.  Innovation: The attacker's advantage : Richard N. Foster 316 pages, £14.95 (London, Macmillan, 1986) , 1987 .

[27]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward a “Critical Mass” Theory of Interactive Media , 1987 .

[28]  G. Dosi.  Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .

[29]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation , 1989 .

[30]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[31]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[32]  P. Ghemawat.  Commitment: The Dynamic of Strategy , 1991 .

[33]  E. Schein.  Organizational Culture and Leadership , 1991 .

[34]  Robert A. Burgelman.  Intraorganizational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaptation: Theory and Field Research , 1991 .

[35]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile , 1990 .

[36]  Eric Abrahamson.  Managerial Fads and Fashions: The Diffusion and Rejection of Innovations , 1991 .

[37]  D. Teece.  Competition, Cooperation, and Innovation Organizational Arrangements for Regimes of Rapid Technological Progress , 1992 .

[38]  J. Kotter,et al.  Corporate Culture and Performance , 1992 .

[39]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[40]  David J. Miller,et al.  The Architecture of Simplicity , 1993 .

[41]  K. Clark,et al.  Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction☆ , 1993 .

[42]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Resetting the Clock: The Dynamics of Organizational Change and Failure. , 1990 .

[43]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[44]  C. Fombrun,et al.  Macrocultures: Determinants and Consequences , 1994 .

[45]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Technological Discontinuties, Organizational Capabilities, and Strategic Commitments , 1994, Industrial and Corporate Change.

[46]  Robert A. Burgelman.  Fading Memories: A Process Theory of Strategic Business Exit in Dynamic Environments , 1994 .

[47]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[48]  David L. Deeds,et al.  Strategic alliances and the rate of new product development: An empirical study of entrepreneurial biotechnology firms , 1996 .

[49]  Richard S. Rosenbloom,et al.  Managerial Commitments and Technological Change in the US Tire Industry , 1997 .

[50]  Mary Tripsas.  Unraveling The Process Of Creative Destruction: Complementary Assets And Incumbent Survival In The Typesetter Industry , 1997 .

[51]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[52]  Clayton M. Christensen.  The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[53]  M. Ruef,et al.  ASSESSING ORGANIZATIONAL FITNESS ON A DYNAMIC LANDSCAPE: AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF THE RELATIVE INERTIA THESIS , 1997 .

[54]  Melissa A. Schilling.  Technological Lockout: An Integrative Model of the Economic and Strategic Factors Driving Technology Success and Failure , 1998 .

[55]  D. Mowery.  The changing structure of the US national innovation system: implications for international conflict and cooperation in R&D policy , 1998 .

[56]  R. Kurzweil.  The Age of Spiritual Machines , 1999 .

[57]  R. Rosenbloom.  Leadership, Capabilities, and Technological Change: The Transformation of NCR in the Electronic Era , 2000 .

[58]  Cynthia Robbins-Roth,et al.  From alchemy to IPO : the business of biotechnology , 2000 .

[59]  Giovanni Gavetti,et al.  Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging , 2000 .

[60]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  Assessing Technology Projects Using Real Options Reasoning , 2000 .

[61]  Richard Leifer,et al.  Radical Innovation: How Mature Companies Can Outsmart Upstarts , 2000 .

[62]  F. Rothaermel.  Strategic Management Journal Research Note Incumbent's Advantage through Exploiting Complementary Assets via Interfirm Cooperation , 2022 .

[63]  Walter R. Nord,et al.  Managing Power , 2001, IEEE Des. Test Comput..

[64]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Alliance capability, stock market response, and long‐term alliance success: the role of the alliance function , 2002 .

[65]  Dale A. Stirling,et al.  Information rules , 2003, SGMD.